Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of October, 1999

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Search Archives

Re: Tutoring, 02/19/1999 10:43, Wes Davis
Units, 10/01/1999 04:40, Barlow Newbolt
Re: mars and venus (long), 10/01/1999 05:14, Eric T. Lane
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 10/01/1999 06:04, David Bowman
Shock,Horror: Kingdom Lost for Want of a Nail, 10/01/1999 08:30, brian whatcott
units, 10/01/1999 09:46, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity/cosmic rays, 10/01/1999 10:41, Pat Keeney
Re: Shock,Horror: Kingdom Lost for Want of a Nail, 10/01/1999 10:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 10/01/1999 11:09, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Units, 10/01/1999 12:04, Jim Green
Re: Units, 10/01/1999 12:10, Chuck Britton
Re: Units, 10/01/1999 12:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 10/01/1999 12:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 10/01/1999 13:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 10/01/1999 14:56, Hugh Haskell
Re(2): Units, 10/01/1999 15:32, Brian Rintoul
Re: Units, 10/01/1999 15:48, Chuck Britton
Re: units: k, K, kibi, 10/01/1999 18:11, brian whatcott
COLLEGE EDUCATION ON THE AUCTION BLOCK, 10/01/1999 21:14, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 10/01/1999 21:42, John Denker
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity/cosmic rays, 10/02/1999 00:48, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Tide, 10/02/1999 02:38, Jim Green
Re: Tide, 10/02/1999 06:28, John Cooper
Physics in Australia - not quite the full story, 10/02/1999 09:21, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Dull Razors, 10/02/1999 17:48, James McLean
Re: Netscape Communicator, 10/02/1999 19:02, James McLean
Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 06:09, John Cooper
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 13:40, Herschel Neumann
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 14:25, William Weiler
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 16:08, Richard Grandy
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 16:19, Jim Diamond
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 10/03/1999 16:23, Marc Kossover
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 16:38, Richard Grandy
Re: Orbitals visualized, 10/03/1999 16:53, John Cooper
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 10/03/1999 17:07, Hugh Haskell
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 10/03/1999 22:18, Fran Poodry
"Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/03/1999 23:49, brian whatcott
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 01:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 10/04/1999 05:11, Ed Schweber
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 10/04/1999 08:11, B. Esser
Re: Dull Razors, 10/04/1999 09:35, Tom Ford
Caboose?, 10/04/1999 10:31, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Choice of textbooks, 10/04/1999 10:33, Laurent Hodges
No calculators on exams, 10/04/1999 10:42, Laurent Hodges
Re: Choice of textbooks, 10/04/1999 10:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 11:01, Michael Edmiston
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 11:17, Richard Tarara
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 11:58, Joel Rauber
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 12:19, Richard Grandy
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 12:30, Clarence Bennett
Re: Pernicious Ideas (was "Faraday's Final Riddle"), 10/04/1999 12:44, brian whatcott
Re: Choice of textbooks, 10/04/1999 13:06, Daniel Schroeder
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 13:07, Chuck Britton
Re: flux +- quantization, 10/04/1999 13:44, John Denker
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 13:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:26, Jim Birdsong
Aw Shucks, 10/04/1999 14:38, John Cooper
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:38, Clarence Bennett
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:44, Richard Grandy
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:44, Spagna Jr., George
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 14:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: Aw Shucks, 10/04/1999 14:52, Joel Rauber
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 14:55, Richard Tarara
Re: swamped, 10/04/1999 14:56, Karl Trappe
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 15:01, Joel Rauber
Re: Aw Shucks, 10/04/1999 15:15, Leigh Palmer
Re: flux +- quantization, 10/04/1999 15:38, Chuck Britton
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 15:38, Peter Schoch
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 15:40, Chuck Britton
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 15:47, Gordon Smith
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 16:18, Sampere
A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/04/1999 16:24, William Beaty
Re: flux +- quantization (off list), 10/04/1999 16:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/04/1999 16:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 16:51, Clarence Bennett
Re: flux +- quantization, 10/04/1999 16:51, John Denker
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 16:51, Maurice Barnhill
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 16:59, William Beaty
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 17:01, Joel Rauber
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 17:56, Cliff Parker
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/04/1999 18:13, Michael Edmiston
Re: Caboose?, 10/04/1999 18:48, brian whatcott
Re: science-fairs and scientific method, 10/04/1999 18:52, William Beaty
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 18:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/04/1999 19:23, William Beaty
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 19:41, Chuck Britton
Re: reality vs. science fair vs. hypothesis testing, 10/04/1999 19:46, William Beaty
Crocodile clips, 10/04/1999 21:23, Greg Kifer
Re: reality vs. science fair vs. hypothesis testing, 10/04/1999 22:26, William Beaty
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/04/1999 23:01, Larry Cartwright
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/04/1999 23:35, Bob Sciamanda
Re: URL syntax, 10/05/1999 00:06, John Denker
In praise of puzzles, 10/05/1999 00:47, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Caboose?, 10/05/1999 00:56, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Aw Shucks, 10/05/1999 01:08, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 08:03, Lois Breur Krause
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/05/1999 08:30, Lois Breur Krause
Re: "Faraday's Final Riddle", 10/05/1999 08:48, Lois Breur Krause
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 09:19, John Denker
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 09:52, Lois Breur Krause
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 09:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 10:04, Joel Rauber
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 10:09, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 10:17, Joel Rauber
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 10:29, John Denker
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 10:32, Richard Tarara
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 10:42, Lois Breur Krause
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 10:49, Joel Rauber
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 10:54, Richard Tarara
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 10:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 11:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 11:16, Lois Breur Krause
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 11:17, Lois Breur Krause
Re: hypotheses non fingo, 10/05/1999 11:44, John Denker
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 4 Oct 1999 - Special issue, 10/05/1999 11:55, Linda Meichle
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 11:59, Hugh Haskell
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 12:05, Michael Edmiston
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 12:24, David Bowman
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 12:29, John Denker
teacher's version of Kittel&Kroemer?, 10/05/1999 13:02, wmw
Killing a subject (was Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs), 10/05/1999 13:21, John Mallinckrodt
Re: underwear, 10/05/1999 14:16, Chuck Britton
Re: underwear, 10/05/1999 14:26, Shapiro, Mark
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 14:41, Joel Rauber
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 14:45, Joel Rauber
Re: Killing a subject (was Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs), 10/05/1999 15:01, William Beaty
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 15:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 16:05, Joel Rauber
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 16:26, Hugh Haskell
Re: Killing a subject (was Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs), 10/05/1999 16:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 17:25, Michael Edmiston
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 17:30, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 17:55, Richard Tarara
value, price, and cost, 10/05/1999 18:38, John S. Denker
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 18:41, Chuck Britton
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 18:42, Robert A Cohen
Re: let's outgrow puzzles, 10/05/1999 19:07, Zach Wolff
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 20:56, Cliff Parker
Re: more on 'hypotheses non fingo", 10/05/1999 21:18, brian whatcott
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 21:38, Chuck Britton
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/05/1999 21:47, Cliff Parker
Re: value, price, and cost, 10/05/1999 21:52, Hugh Haskell
Measuring things, 10/05/1999 22:10, Chuck Britton
Re: dealing fickle success, 10/05/1999 22:13, John Denker
Re: Caboose?, 10/05/1999 23:03, brian whatcott
Re: dealing fickle success, 10/05/1999 23:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 05:07, William Beaty
Re: pearl diving, 10/06/1999 07:39, John Denker
Re: dealing with fickle success, 10/06/1999 08:07, John Denker
Re: underwear, 10/06/1999 08:24, Lois Breur Krause
Re: dealing with fickle success, 10/06/1999 09:14, Karl Trappe
science fair petition?, 10/06/1999 09:31, William Beaty
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 09:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 10:12, Joel Rauber
Re: science fair petition?, 10/06/1999 10:23, Joel Rauber
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 10:33, Joel Rauber
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 10:51, Timothy Folkerts
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 11:08, Karl Trappe
Music Fairs, 10/06/1999 11:21, Doug Craigen
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 14:11, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: science fair petition?, 10/06/1999 15:52, paul o johnson
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 18:02, Cliff Parker
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 18:33, brian whatcott
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 20:02, Rick Tarara
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 20:07, Cliff Parker
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 20:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: c in m/s (was A. Einstein and science-fairs), 10/06/1999 20:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: speed of light, 10/06/1999 21:44, brian whatcott
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/06/1999 21:51, Bob Sciamanda
Chalupas, 10/07/1999 00:58, Jim Green
Re: Chalupas, 10/07/1999 07:35, brian whatcott
Re: speed of light, 10/07/1999 09:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/07/1999 10:51, Maurice Barnhill
Re: speed of light, 10/07/1999 11:08, Ron Ebert
Re: science fair petition?, 10/07/1999 14:00, William Beaty
Re: science fair petition?, 10/07/1999 16:16, Ron Ebert
Re: Chalupas, 10/07/1999 17:10, paul o johnson
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/07/1999 18:39, Cliff Parker
Re: Chalupas, 10/07/1999 19:19, Karl Trappe
Re: speed of light, 10/07/1999 19:27, Leigh Palmer
Ultrasonic, 10/07/1999 20:43, David Abineri
Re: Chalupas (more OT), 10/07/1999 21:02, brian whatcott
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/07/1999 21:14, William Beaty
Re: Chalupas, 10/07/1999 21:20, Raymond A. Rogoway
phys-L deteriorating?, 10/07/1999 21:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/07/1999 21:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: phys-L deteriorating?, 10/07/1999 22:04, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: phys-L deteriorating?, 10/07/1999 22:05, Chuck Britton
Re: phys-L deteriorating?, 10/07/1999 22:30, sampere
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/07/1999 22:33, Norman Lohstreter
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/07/1999 23:44, Bob Sciamanda
Sorry, 10/08/1999 00:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/08/1999 02:25, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Is phys-l slipping, 10/08/1999 04:33, Barlow Newbolt
tutoring, 10/08/1999 06:09, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Chalupas, 10/08/1999 08:08, Spagna Jr., George
Measureing the speed of light was - A. Einstein and science, 10/08/1999 08:46, Cliff Parker
Re: Measuring the speed of light was - A. Einstein and scien, 10/08/1999 08:46, David Bowman
Re: Chalupas, 10/08/1999 08:53, David Bowman
Re: Chalupas, 10/08/1999 09:03, Spagna Jr., George
Tutoring, 10/08/1999 09:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:14, Jerry Hester
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:14, Sampere
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:18, Joel Rauber
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:18, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:46, Greg Puskar
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 10:47, Stan Dodds
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 11:01, Leigh Palmer
Re: speed of light, 10/08/1999 11:01, Ron Ebert
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 11:15, Ken Fox
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 11:22, Lois Breur Krause
Undergraduate Research Collaborations, 10/08/1999 11:25, Timothy Folkerts
Re: internal or external, 10/08/1999 11:28, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 11:38, Richard Bowman
Re: Cryogenics Bat, 10/08/1999 12:00, Thomas O'Neill
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 12:17, Robert A Cohen
Re: Grading schemes, 10/08/1999 12:31, Roger Freedman
Re: Grading schemes, 10/08/1999 12:42, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Bimodal grades, 10/08/1999 12:44, Karl Trappe
Re: Grading schemes, 10/08/1999 13:24, Richard Tarara
Re: Grading schemes, 10/08/1999 13:27, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Bimodal grades, 10/08/1999 14:20, Leigh Palmer
Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 14:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 14:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 14:56, Richard Tarara
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 14:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 15:07, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 15:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Grading schemes(outrage), 10/08/1999 15:37, Joel Rauber
UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 16:27, Joel Rauber
Re: Chalupas, 10/08/1999 16:32, paul o johnson
Should tutoring free?, 10/08/1999 16:33, Joel Rauber
Re: Chalupas (more OT), 10/08/1999 16:34, paul o johnson
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 16:37, Ed Schweber
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 16:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 16:40, Shapiro, Mark
Re: A. Einstein and science-fairs, 10/08/1999 16:43, paul o johnson
Re: phys-L deteriorating?, 10/08/1999 16:43, paul o johnson
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 16:50, paul o johnson
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 16:54, Joel Rauber
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 17:01, paul o johnson
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 17:04, paul o johnson
Re: phys-L deteriorating?, 10/08/1999 17:23, Karl Trappe
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 17:23, Michael Edmiston
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 17:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 17:29, John Gastineau
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant) average grades, 10/08/1999 17:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: Chalupas (more OT), 10/08/1999 17:38, brian whatcott
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 17:41, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Internal or external?, 10/08/1999 17:57, Michael Edmiston
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 18:17, brian whatcott
Re: Tutoring, 10/08/1999 18:33, Stan Dodds
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 19:56, Raymond A. Rogoway
assigning final grades, 10/08/1999 19:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: assigning final grades, 10/08/1999 20:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 22:18, Norman Lohstreter
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 22:18, Norman Lohstreter
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/08/1999 22:28, Jerome Epstein
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/08/1999 23:34, brian whatcott
Re: Chalupas (more OT), 10/09/1999 02:23, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Is phys-l slipping, 10/09/1999 04:47, Dayton Labs
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/09/1999 11:17, Marc Kossover
Re: Chalupas (long, wildly off-topic), 10/09/1999 11:46, brian whatcott
Re: Internal or external?, 10/09/1999 13:04, B.Surendranath Reddy
Re: Internal or external?, 10/09/1999 13:59, Joel Rauber
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/09/1999 14:12, Joel Rauber
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/09/1999 14:59, paul o johnson
Re: Internal or external?, 10/09/1999 16:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 8 Oct 1999 to 9 Oct 1999 - Special issue, 10/09/1999 16:56, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Internal or external?, 10/09/1999 20:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Tutoring, 10/09/1999 20:56, Richard Grandy
Car talk 10-9-99 ie: Was that who I thought it was?, 10/09/1999 22:21, Brad Shue
Re: Ultrasonic, 10/09/1999 23:09, Norman Lohstreter
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 01:08, Brian McInnes
Re: Tutoring, 10/10/1999 02:02, Jon Bell
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 06:37, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 09:37, Brian McInnes
Re: Car talk 10-9-99 ie: Was that who I thought it was?, 10/10/1999 12:01, Joel Rauber
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 12:05, Joel Rauber
free-body diagrams, 10/10/1999 12:13, Joel Rauber
ActivPhysics2, 10/10/1999 12:48, Alan Gibson
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/10/1999 12:52, John Denker
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/10/1999 14:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 14:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 16:08, paul o johnson
Re: Internal or external?, 10/10/1999 16:34, Robert Carlson
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 17:45, brian whatcott
What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 18:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 18:11, Cliff Parker
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 18:19, Shapiro, Mark
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 18:48, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 19:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 19:32, Robert Carlson
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/10/1999 19:40, Bob Sciamanda
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 19:45, Jerome Epstein
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 20:56, Cliff Parker
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 21:07, Cliff Parker
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 21:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 21:15, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/10/1999 21:33, Robert Carlson
A glimpse., 10/10/1999 21:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What is weight?, 10/10/1999 22:29, Timothy Folkerts
Re: What is weight?, 10/10/1999 22:30, Timothy Folkerts
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 01:08, Jim Green
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 01:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 01:33, Ludwik Kowalski
ActivPhysics 2, 10/11/1999 01:41, Roger Freedman
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 01:51, John Mallinckrodt
(horrible) examples of my treatment of weight, 10/11/1999 01:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: A glimpse., 10/11/1999 02:17, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 06:30, Robert Carlson
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 06:51, David Bowman
Re: (horrible) examples of my treatment of weight, 10/11/1999 06:58, Frank M. Lanzafame
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 08:20, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Tutoring, 10/11/1999 08:25, Lois Breur Krause
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 09:26, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 09:46, John Denker
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/11/1999 10:09, Peter Schoch
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 10:20, Richard Tarara
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 10:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 10:46, Lois Breur Krause
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 10:50, Richard Tarara
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 10:58, John Denker
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 11:08, John Mallinckrodt
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 11:19, Michael Edmiston
Weightless physics, 10/11/1999 11:26, Laurent Hodges
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 11:30, Michael Edmiston
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 11:39, paul o johnson
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 11:54, Michael Edmiston
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 12:03, Jerome Epstein
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 12:19, Shapiro, Mark
Re: A glimpse., 10/11/1999 12:20, Cliff Parker
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 13:02, Robert A Cohen
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 13:11, Shapiro, Mark
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 13:22, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: UCLA physics course (non-rant), 10/11/1999 13:28, Richard Grandy
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 13:58, Leigh Palmer
the web posting problem - again, 10/11/1999 14:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 14:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: Weightless physics, 10/11/1999 14:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 14:49, Jerome Epstein
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 14:50, Leigh Palmer
infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 14:54, Carl E. Mungan
undergrad physics course sequence, 10/11/1999 15:01, Carl E. Mungan
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 15:15, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 15:28, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 15:47, Carl E. Mungan
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 15:53, Richard Tarara
Re: undergrad physics course sequence, 10/11/1999 15:55, Stephen Murray
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 16:41, Jim Green
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 17:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 19:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 19:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: undergrad physics course sequence, 10/11/1999 19:15, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: undergrad physics course sequence, 10/11/1999 19:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: Internal or external?, 10/11/1999 19:38, Larry Smith
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 19:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: What is weight?, 10/11/1999 19:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 21:02, brian whatcott
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 22:02, Cliff Parker
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/11/1999 22:39, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/11/1999 22:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/11/1999 23:10, David Bowman
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors (addendum), 10/11/1999 23:33, David Bowman
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/11/1999 23:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/12/1999 00:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: What is Weight?, 10/12/1999 04:51, Barlow Newbolt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 08:41, Clarence Bennett
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/12/1999 08:46, Karl Trappe
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/12/1999 09:48, David Bowman
advanced undergrad labs, 10/12/1999 09:57, Bob Muir
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 11:14, Jerome Epstein
Re: What is weight?, 10/12/1999 11:30, Jerome Epstein
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/12/1999 11:54, Jerome Epstein
Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 11:54, romanza
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 11:57, Jerome Epstein
Newton is #2, 10/12/1999 12:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 12:30, Robert Carlson
Re: Newton is #2, 10/12/1999 12:40, Greg Puskar
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 13:07, Maurice Barnhill
Re: What is weight?, 10/12/1999 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 13:43, Joel Rauber
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/12/1999 13:43, David Bowman
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/12/1999 13:47, Ludwik Kowalski
A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 14:08, Joel Rauber
Re: undergrad physics course sequence, 10/12/1999 14:39, Joel Rauber
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 15:14, Ken Fox
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 15:15, Michael Edmiston
Re: Newton is #2, 10/12/1999 15:38, Karl Trappe
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 16:04, Joel Rauber
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 16:28, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 16:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 16:58, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 16:59, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 17:40, David Kardelis
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 18:03, Cliff Parker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 18:10, Timothy Folkerts
Re: undergrad physics course sequence, 10/12/1999 18:34, Greg Clements
Re: free-body diagrams, 10/12/1999 19:14, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Grades at Princeton (Was: UCLA physics course (non-rant)), 10/12/1999 20:07, Jon Bell
Re: Grades at Princeton (Was: UCLA physics course (non-rant)), 10/12/1999 20:36, Richard Grandy
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 21:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 21:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/12/1999 21:34, Jerome Epstein
Re: What is weight?, 10/12/1999 21:38, Jerome Epstein
Re: Grades at Princeton (Was: UCLA physics course (non-rant)), 10/12/1999 21:48, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 22:03, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 22:04, Jerome Epstein
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 22:07, Cliff Parker
audio feedback, 10/12/1999 22:14, fred brace
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 22:15, John Mallinckrodt
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/12/1999 22:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: audio feedback, 10/12/1999 22:46, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/12/1999 22:58, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 00:43, Jim Green
Re: What is weight?, 10/13/1999 01:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Grades at Princeton (Was: UCLA physics course (non-rant)), 10/13/1999 08:27, Lois Breur Krause
Re: audio feedback, 10/13/1999 08:34, Lois Breur Krause
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 08:42, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 08:45, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 08:51, Joel Rauber
electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 10:13, David Bone
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 10:16, Michael Edmiston
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 10:24, John Denker
Re: electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 10:45, John Denker
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 11:00, A. R. Marlow
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 11:18, Jerome Epstein
Re: Measurement of mass, 10/13/1999 11:22, Ken Fox
Re: electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 11:29, Roger Haar
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 11:39, John Denker
Re: electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 11:45, John Denker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 11:51, Jim Green
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 12:03, Michael Edmiston
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:06, Joel Rauber
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:12, A. R. Marlow
Re: What is weight? (was Re: Internal or external?), 10/13/1999 12:15, Roger Freedman
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:45, John Mallinckrodt
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:50, John Denker
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 12:54, John Mallinckrodt
Re: electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 12:55, Jerry Lisantti
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 13:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 13:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 14:20, Clarence Bennett
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 15:04, Joel Rauber
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 15:50, A. R. Marlow
Re: operationally inertial frames, 10/13/1999 15:54, A. R. Marlow
Re infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/13/1999 16:52, Robert Blumenthal
Electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 17:21, Bob Sciamanda
skydiving?, 10/13/1999 17:50, kyle forinash
Re: Electronic stripes, 10/13/1999 19:21, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 19:34, Cliff Parker
Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 19:39, Cliff Parker
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 20:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 20:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 21:10, Cliff Parker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 21:20, Cliff Parker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 21:33, Jim Green
FW: Vacuum in Science and Technology workshop (fwd), 10/13/1999 21:44, William Beaty
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 22:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 22:00, Jerome Epstein
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 22:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: skydiving?, 10/13/1999 23:03, Norman Lohstreter
ultrasonic update, 10/13/1999 23:08, Norman Lohstreter
Re: A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 23:09, Robert Carlson
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 23:21, Cliff Parker
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/13/1999 23:30, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 00:19, Jim Green
Vernacular (was A weighty subject), 10/14/1999 07:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 07:36, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 08:28, Robert Carlson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 09:00, Joel Rauber
Re: skydiving?, 10/14/1999 09:03, Dr. Richard Swanson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 10:25, Michael Edmiston
FREEFALL OR NOT, 10/14/1999 10:49, Richard Tarara
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 11:37, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 12:02, Michael Edmiston
Re: FREEFALL OR NOT, 10/14/1999 12:09, Richard Tarara
Re: electronic stripes, 10/14/1999 12:21, paul o johnson
Re: FREEFALL OR NOT, 10/14/1999 12:36, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 12:36, paul o johnson
Re: ultrasonic update, 10/14/1999 12:45, paul o johnson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 12:51, paul o johnson
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 12:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 13:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject - a reply to the fixed weighters..., 10/14/1999 13:29, brian whatcott
Re: FREEFALL OR NOT, 10/14/1999 13:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 13:33, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 13:33, Robert Carlson
Re: Laser beam, 10/14/1999 14:42, Gordon Smith
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 15:18, paul o johnson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 15:30, Joel Rauber
Laser beam, 10/14/1999 15:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 15:36, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 15:48, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 16:12, Robert Carlson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 16:13, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Laser beam, 10/14/1999 16:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 16:24, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 17:25, Jim Green
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 17:33, Robert Carlson
Re: A weighty subject - a reply to the fixed weighters..., 10/14/1999 17:49, Michael Edmiston
Re: Laser beam, 10/14/1999 19:16, Chuck Britton
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 19:29, Chuck Britton
Re: A weighty subject - a reply to the fixed weighters..., 10/14/1999 19:40, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 19:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 19:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: ultrasonic update, 10/14/1999 20:29, Norman Lohstreter
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 20:59, Michael Edmiston
Re: A weighty subject - a reply to the fixed weighters..., 10/14/1999 21:03, Cliff Parker
Re: A weighty subject - wrong?, 10/14/1999 21:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: A weighty subject - a reply to the fixed weighters..., 10/14/1999 21:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 21:58, Brian McInnes
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 22:56, Glenn Knapp
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 23:02, Timothy Folkerts
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 23:03, Glenn Knapp
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 23:05, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/14/1999 23:49, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 00:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject - wrong?, 10/15/1999 01:05, Jim Green
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 01:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject - wrong?, 10/15/1999 08:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 08:41, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 09:09, Clarence Bennett
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 09:36, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 09:55, Richard Tarara
Re: Weight Discussion, 10/15/1999 10:15, Van E. Neie
Ahh... vindication (balances), 10/15/1999 10:16, Michael Edmiston
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/15/1999 10:25, Mojca Cepic
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 10:37, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject - wrong?, 10/15/1999 10:40, Chuck Britton
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 10:42, Joel Rauber
Snell (in Calcite), 10/15/1999 10:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Proud father brags about his kid, 10/15/1999 11:01, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 11:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/15/1999 11:39, Gary Karshner
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 11:43, Richard Tarara
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 11:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/15/1999 11:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 11:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 11:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 12:00, John Mallinckrodt
ice & water, 10/15/1999 12:04, Kathy Daniel
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 12:23, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 12:28, Chuck Britton
Re: Proud father brags about his kid, 10/15/1999 12:40, Van E. Neie
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 12:43, Richard Tarara
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 12:52, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/15/1999 12:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 13:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 13:43, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 13:52, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 14:48, Marc Kossover
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 15:25, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 15:33, Robert Carlson
Re: Electronic balances was A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 16:31, paul o johnson
Re: ice & water, 10/15/1999 16:33, Robert A Cohen
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 16:54, Michael Edmiston
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 16:55, paul o johnson
varying mass systems: rockets included (medium length), 10/15/1999 17:04, Joel Rauber
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 17:12, paul o johnson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 17:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 18:09, Robert A Cohen
Re: A weighty matter, 10/15/1999 18:09, Larry Cartwright
Re: A weighty subject, 10/15/1999 20:14, brian whatcott
Double Atwood, 10/15/1999 20:29, David Abineri
Most Accurate Solar System Ephemeris, 10/15/1999 21:30, brian whatcott
Obits, 10/15/1999 21:41, brian whatcott
Re: ice & water, 10/15/1999 21:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Proud father brags about his kid, 10/15/1999 21:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: varying mass systems: rockets included (medium length), 10/15/1999 22:00, Cliff Parker
Re: varying mass systems: rockets included (medium length), 10/15/1999 23:06, Cliff Parker
Re: ultrasonic update, 10/16/1999 00:03, brian whatcott
Re: Double Atwood, 10/16/1999 00:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Double Atwood, 10/16/1999 09:25, Ed Schweber
Re: A weighty subject /nitpicking, 10/16/1999 10:56, brian whatcott
Re: audio feedback, 10/16/1999 12:29, brian whatcott
Re: Double Atwood, 10/16/1999 13:20, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Double Atwood (errata), 10/16/1999 13:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 13:54, John Mallinckrodt
web page help, 10/16/1999 14:49, Leon Leonardo
Re: web page help, 10/16/1999 15:48, Shapiro, Mark
Re: web page help, 10/16/1999 16:03, Brad Shue
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 16:16, Robert Carlson
Re: Double Atwood, 10/16/1999 16:58, Bob Sciamanda
summary of weight, 10/16/1999 17:10, John Denker
ActivPhysics2:Thanks for the help, 10/16/1999 17:19, Alan Gibson
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 17:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 17:41, John Denker
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 17:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 18:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 18:21, Robert Carlson
Re: ultrasonic update, 10/16/1999 18:25, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 18:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 18:52, John Denker
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 19:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: web page help, 10/16/1999 20:21, Peter Schoch
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 20:38, John Denker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 20:40, Robert Carlson
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 20:51, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 21:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 22:04, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 22:47, Robert Carlson
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 22:49, Bob Sciamanda
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 23:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 23:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A weighty subject, 10/16/1999 23:38, brian whatcott
Re: summary of weight, 10/16/1999 23:39, Robert Carlson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/17/1999 00:19, Robert Carlson
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 00:30, John Denker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/17/1999 00:39, Robert Carlson
Re: Laser beam, 10/17/1999 00:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A weighty subject, 10/17/1999 01:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject, 10/17/1999 01:48, Robert Carlson
Re: A weighty subject, 10/17/1999 01:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 01:56, Leigh Palmer
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 08:25, Robert Carlson
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/17/1999 08:29, Mojca Cepic
Re: summary of elevator equivalence, 10/17/1999 08:32, John Denker
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/17/1999 08:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Weightlessness, 10/17/1999 09:42, romanza
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/17/1999 09:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/17/1999 10:15, paul o johnson
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 10:28, brian whatcott
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/17/1999 11:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: Weightlessness, 10/17/1999 12:14, Robert Carlson
Re: Weightlessness, 10/17/1999 12:31, Bob Sciamanda
Experts needed, any takers?, 10/17/1999 18:28, Larry Cartwright
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 21:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: summary of weight, 10/17/1999 23:12, brian whatcott
Re: summary of weight, 10/18/1999 00:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: A weighty subject, 10/18/1999 01:07, Jim Green
Re: A weighty subject, 10/18/1999 02:00, Leigh Palmer
chem_weight vs. phys_weight, 10/18/1999 03:13, John Denker
Re: A weighty subject, 10/18/1999 08:47, Joel Rauber
Newton's Second Law, 10/18/1999 09:29, Barlow Newbolt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/18/1999 09:47, Michael Edmiston
Re: varying mass systems: rockets included (medium length), 10/18/1999 10:12, Joel Rauber
Re: varying mass systems: rockets included (medium length), 10/18/1999 10:24, Joel Rauber
poundals, 10/18/1999 10:33, John Denker
Re: poundals, 10/18/1999 10:53, Michael Edmiston
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 11:17, John Denker
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 11:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 12:24, Richard Tarara
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 13:02, Clarence Bennett
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 13:07, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A weighty subject, 10/18/1999 13:07, Chuck Britton
Re: Proud father brags about his kid, 10/18/1999 13:42, Sam Sampere
Re: revision of Newton's Second Law, 10/18/1999 13:48, John Denker
Re: summary of weight, 10/18/1999 14:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: poundals, 10/18/1999 14:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 14:47, paul o johnson
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/18/1999 15:02, paul o johnson
summary of summary of weight, 10/18/1999 15:02, Joel Rauber
Re: poundals, 10/18/1999 15:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: summary of summary of weight, 10/18/1999 15:38, Richard Tarara
Re: web page help, 10/18/1999 16:14, Ron Ebert
inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 18:05, Joel Rauber
Humor was Re:poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 18:30, Vacek Miglus
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/18/1999 19:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 20:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: poundals, 10/18/1999 20:43, Jerome Epstein
Re: poundal vs. poundee, 10/18/1999 20:44, Jerome Epstein
Re: Poundal, 10/18/1999 20:45, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 20:54, Cliff Parker
Re: Poundal, 10/18/1999 21:40, Jerome Epstein
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 21:43, Jerome Epstein
ZORB!, 10/18/1999 21:49, William Beaty
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 23:04, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/18/1999 23:17, David Bowman
Re: summary of weight, 10/19/1999 00:46, brian whatcott
Re: A weighty subject, 10/19/1999 00:58, brian whatcott
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 08:44, Joel Rauber
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 09:36, Joel Rauber
Re: summary of summary of weight, 10/19/1999 09:41, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Snell (in Calcite), 10/19/1999 10:18, Mojca Cepic
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 11:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 12:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 12:08, Joel Rauber
Re: web page help, 10/19/1999 12:09, Peter Schoch
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 12:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/19/1999 12:32, Jerome Epstein
Re: web page help, 10/19/1999 12:35, Ron Ebert
Small telescopes, 10/19/1999 12:40, Dr. James Mackey
Re: More and more weight/mass Units, 10/19/1999 13:12, Richard Grandy
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 13:15, Leigh Palmer
Re: More and more weight/mass Units, 10/19/1999 13:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: revision of Newton's Second Law, 10/19/1999 13:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: More and more weight/mass Units, 10/19/1999 14:22, John Mallinckrodt
Re: revision of Newton's Second Law, 10/19/1999 15:08, Rondo Jeffery
John Mallinckrodt's Mug, 10/19/1999 16:02, Joel Rauber
Re: Newton's 3rd law?, 10/19/1999 17:48, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/19/1999 18:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law?, 10/19/1999 18:41, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 18:51, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 19:02, Cliff Parker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 19:29, Cliff Parker
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/19/1999 19:32, David Bowman
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 19:41, brian whatcott
ANNOUNCING CHAUTAUQUA COURSES ON ACTIVE LEARNING FOR SPRING, 2000 (fwd), 10/19/1999 20:02, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 20:04, Leigh Palmer
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 20:18, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/19/1999 20:26, paul o johnson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 20:27, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 20:46, Leigh Palmer
Linearizing Graphs, 10/19/1999 20:46, Ed Schweber
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/19/1999 20:57, Bob Sciamanda
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 21:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 21:11, brian whatcott
Re: Impact of Spheroidicity, 10/19/1999 21:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 21:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 21:41, Cliff Parker
not physics, 10/19/1999 21:42, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/19/1999 21:58, Brian McInnes
Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 22:04, Bob Sciamanda
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/19/1999 22:19, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 22:29, Robert Carlson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/19/1999 23:13, David Bowman
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/19/1999 23:19, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 00:22, Brian McInnes
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 00:33, Bob Sciamanda
More and more weight/mass Units, 10/20/1999 01:01, Doug Craigen
Re: revision of Newton's Second Law, 10/20/1999 01:12, Doug Craigen
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 01:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 06:00, John Cooper
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 06:54, Ed Schweber
Re: web page help, 10/20/1999 07:35, Peter Schoch
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 07:39, Peter Schoch
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 07:42, Spagna Jr., George
Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition) (2), 10/20/1999 08:29, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 08:33, John Gastineau
You get a rod and I'll get a pole, 10/20/1999 09:42, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 10:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 10:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 10:41, John Cooper
Call your US Rep about Str. A's Act, today, 10/20/1999 10:53, Jane Jackson
Re: Call your Congressman about Str A's Act, 10/20/1999 10:58, Jane Jackson
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 10:58, Michael Edmiston
Unnoticed WIN/NT Y2K bug, 10/20/1999 11:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Call your Congressman about Str A's Act, 10/20/1999 11:30, Dr. James Mackey
Re: Unnoticed WIN/NT Y2K bug, 10/20/1999 11:35, Richard Tarara
Re: Unnoticed WIN/NT Y2K bug, 10/20/1999 11:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 12:24, THOMAS SANDIN
Re: Unnoticed WIN/NT Y2K bug, 10/20/1999 12:41, Richard Tarara
Re: Unnoticed WIN/NT Y2K bug, 10/20/1999 12:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Call your Congressman about Str A's Act, 10/20/1999 13:10, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 13:22, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition) (2), 10/20/1999 14:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: call your US Rep today ...., 10/20/1999 16:26, Jane Jackson
Re: call your Congressman today..., 10/20/1999 16:38, Jane Jackson
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 16:43, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
PDT Gain Factor, 10/20/1999 17:55, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 18:01, brian whatcott
Re: PDT Gain Factor, 10/20/1999 18:16, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 18:24, Larry Cartwright
Re: More and more weight/mass Units-STONES, 10/20/1999 18:49, Michael Edmiston
Re: Linearizing Graphs, 10/20/1999 20:37, paul o johnson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 20:59, paul o johnson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 21:49, Robert Carlson
Re: call your US Rep today ...., 10/20/1999 22:14, Jim Green
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 22:14, David Bowman
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 22:40, Leigh Palmer
stellar spectra, 10/20/1999 22:47, fred brace
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/20/1999 23:25, John S. Denker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/20/1999 23:26, Chuck Britton
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/20/1999 23:39, Bob Sciamanda
Physics education (fwd), 10/21/1999 00:16, Joseph Bellina
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 00:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: stellar spectra, 10/21/1999 01:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 01:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 01:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 01:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 06:38, John Denker
Re: Physics education (fwd), 10/21/1999 07:56, Karl Trappe
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 08:44, Chuck Britton
Re: Physics education (fwd), 10/21/1999 08:56, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Physics education (fwd), 10/21/1999 09:30, Joseph Bellina
Rods, poles, and other units that go bump in the night, 10/21/1999 11:00, Vern Lindberg
astronomy list, 10/21/1999 11:44, Dr. James Mackey
Physics education (fwd), 10/21/1999 12:04, Richard Hake
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 12:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 12:31, paul o johnson
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 12:36, Bob Sciamanda
Re: gravitation conserves momentum, 10/21/1999 12:45, John Denker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 13:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 13:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: astronomy list, 10/21/1999 13:48, Ron Ebert
Re: stellar spectra, 10/21/1999 14:32, paul o johnson
Re: Forces w/o third-law partners???????, 10/21/1999 14:34, Jim Green
Re: conservation in rotating frames, 10/21/1999 14:53, John Denker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 15:13, paul o johnson
FCI Gain Factor, 10/21/1999 15:29, Richard Hake
Newton's third and centrifugal forces., 10/21/1999 15:47, Rick Tarara
Re: Newton's third and centrifugal forces., 10/21/1999 16:50, Rick Tarara
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 16:51, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Newton's third and centrifugal forces., 10/21/1999 17:12, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 17:42, Michael Edmiston
Re: stellar spectra, 10/21/1999 18:11, brian whatcott
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 19:03, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 19:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 19:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 20:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 20:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 20:44, John Mallinckrodt
[no subject], 10/21/1999 21:06, Bob Sciamanda
[no subject], 10/21/1999 21:11, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/21/1999 21:40, John Mallinckrodt
Light???, 10/21/1999 22:11, Cliff Parker
Re: Light, resonance, index of refraction,, 10/21/1999 22:36, John Denker
Re: electronic stripes, 10/21/1999 22:52, paul o johnson
Re: Light???, 10/21/1999 23:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: Light???, 10/21/1999 23:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Light, virtual processes don't explain refraction, 10/22/1999 00:14, John Denker
Electric Current "Turbulence", 10/22/1999 05:42, Ed Schweber
Re: Light -photon "saturation", 10/22/1999 05:56, Ed Schweber
Re: Astronomy List, 10/22/1999 06:13, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: bleaching, 10/22/1999 06:24, John Denker
Re: Electric Current Turbulence, 10/22/1999 07:46, John Denker
Re: Electric Current "Turbulence", 10/22/1999 08:11, brian whatcott
Re: Light -photon "saturation", 10/22/1999 08:14, brian whatcott
FBD, 10/22/1999 10:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Light???, 10/22/1999 10:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Light -photon "saturation", 10/22/1999 10:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: FBD, 10/22/1999 11:22, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 14:43, Robert A Cohen
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 15:03, Joseph Bellina
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 15:05, Leigh Palmer
Re FBD, 10/22/1999 15:25, Robert Blumenthal
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 15:41, Joel Rauber
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 16:27, Stan Greenspoon
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 16:38, Joseph Bellina
Textbooks, 10/22/1999 17:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 17:32, paul o johnson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/22/1999 17:36, Michael Edmiston
Re: Light, resonance, index of refraction,, 10/22/1999 18:20, Cliff Parker
Re: Light???, 10/22/1999 18:37, Cliff Parker
Re: Light, resonance, index of refraction, 10/22/1999 20:46, John Denker
Re: Light???, 10/22/1999 20:52, William Beaty
Re: Electric Current "Turbulence", 10/22/1999 21:57, William Beaty
Aurorae?, 10/22/1999 22:00, Chuck Britton
Re: Light -photon "saturation", 10/22/1999 22:15, William Beaty
Re: Aurorae?, 10/23/1999 02:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: Aurorae?, 10/23/1999 07:07, Chuck Britton
Professional MS Degrees in Science - fwd from Tobias, 10/23/1999 12:15, Richard Hake
Re: Aurorae?, 10/23/1999 12:31, Doug Craigen
Re: astronomy list, 10/23/1999 12:39, William J. Larson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 16:09, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:40, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:43, Chuck Britton
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:50, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:54, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 18:59, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 19:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/23/1999 19:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 12:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 13:29, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 15:46, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 17:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 18:36, Robert Carlson
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 20:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 21:57, William J. Larson
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 21:58, Anne Pfannkoch
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 22:01, Ed Schweber
Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 22:24, Jim Green
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 23:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 23:18, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 23:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 23:41, brian whatcott
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/24/1999 23:45, Richard Grandy
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/24/1999 23:57, Brian McInnes
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/25/1999 00:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 01:39, John Denker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 02:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/25/1999 02:58, Jim Green
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 03:47, Brian McInnes
by Newton (was Snell in Calcite), 10/25/1999 05:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 06:52, Ed Schweber
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 08:07, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 08:58, Chuck Britton
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 09:45, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 10:14, Joel Rauber
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/25/1999 10:18, Joseph Bellina
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 10:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 10:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 11:02, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy before work" (was work done by friction), 10/25/1999 11:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 11:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 11:32, Chuck Britton
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 12:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 13:02, Richard Tarara
Re: Energy before work" (was work done by friction), 10/25/1999 14:05, Leigh Palmer
R: Re: Energy before work" (was work done by friction), 10/25/1999 14:36, Paolo Cavallo
KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/25/1999 14:54, David Bowman
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 15:01, Jim Green
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 15:04, Joel Rauber
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/25/1999 15:15, Richard Tarara
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/25/1999 15:35, Joel Rauber
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 15:41, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 16:59, paul o johnson
Re: Energy before work" (was work done by friction), 10/25/1999 17:07, paul o johnson
Re: Energy before work" (was work done by friction), 10/25/1999 17:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 18:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 19:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Flat Earth Chronology, 10/25/1999 19:03, Gary Karshner
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 20:48, brian whatcott
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/25/1999 21:20, David Bowman
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 21:21, Brian McInnes
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 21:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 22:36, Chuck Britton
Re: work done by friction, 10/25/1999 23:52, Brian McInnes
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/25/1999 23:52, Brian McInnes
mystery photomultiplier, 10/25/1999 23:59, James McLean
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 00:05, Brian McInnes
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 00:43, David Bowman
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 00:48, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 01:11, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 01:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 02:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 03:20, Brian McInnes
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 03:20, Brian McInnes
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 06:15, Ed Schweber
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/26/1999 06:25, Ed Schweber
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 07:40, John Denker
Re: KE & temperature, 10/26/1999 08:13, Chuck Britton
Conventional Current, 10/26/1999 08:20, Chuck Britton
Re: work done by friction, 10/26/1999 08:33, Chuck Britton
Re: KE & temperature, 10/26/1999 08:38, John Denker
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/26/1999 09:42, paul o johnson
Re: KE & temperature, 10/26/1999 10:02, David Bowman
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 10:46, Joel Rauber
Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 10:59, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 11:29, Joel Rauber
Re: work done by pushing, 10/26/1999 11:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 11:53, David Bowman
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:10, John Denker
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:12, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: work done by pushing, 10/26/1999 12:22, John Denker
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:41, Jerry Lisantti
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 12:44, Joel Rauber
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:46, Joel Rauber
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:49, John Denker
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 12:49, Joel Rauber
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:26, Michael Edmiston
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:31, Jim Green
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:34, Chuck Britton
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:37, Lemmerhirt, Fred
Re: KE & temperature, 10/26/1999 13:40, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:43, Jim Green
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/26/1999 13:50, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:51, John Denker
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 13:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/26/1999 14:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 14:22, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 14:46, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 15:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 15:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 15:58, Chuck Britton
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 17:11, David Bowman
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/26/1999 19:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newton's 3rd law? was Re: inertial forces (definition), 10/26/1999 19:52, brian whatcott
Introduction and Request for Assistance (fwd), 10/26/1999 20:14, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: KE & temperature (was: Newton's 3rd law? ...), 10/26/1999 21:11, Ed Schweber
"The Amateur Scientist" columns on CDROM, 10/26/1999 22:42, William Beaty
Axion? Huh?, 10/26/1999 22:48, Rupert Greenheart Incarnate, Best of the Best
Re: definition of energy, 10/26/1999 22:59, John Denker
I surrender, 10/27/1999 00:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 02:18, Brian McInnes
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 09:14, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 09:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 09:49, John Denker
Physics curriculum - first advanced course, 10/27/1999 10:35, Dale Orth
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 10:42, Joel Rauber
Re: I surrender, 10/27/1999 10:49, Joel Rauber
Re: Energy as ability to do work, 10/27/1999 10:52, Chuck Britton
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 11:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 11:08, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics curriculum - first advanced course, 10/27/1999 13:45, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 14:03, John Denker
Re: SciAm AmSci index, 10/27/1999 14:48, William Beaty
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 15:11, Joel Rauber
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 15:43, John Denker
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 16:26, Joel Rauber
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 16:48, John Denker
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 16:49, Chuck Britton
Re: infinite square lattice of resistors, 10/27/1999 17:23, David Bowman
off-topic: gerund vs. participle, 10/27/1999 18:26, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 20:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Axion? Huh?, 10/27/1999 20:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: definition of energy (without work?), 10/27/1999 21:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Axion? Huh?, 10/27/1999 22:55, Daniel Schroeder
Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/27/1999 23:18, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: work done by friction, 10/27/1999 23:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 00:03, Bob Sciamanda
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 00:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 00:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 01:04, Robert Carlson
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 01:34, John Mallinckrodt
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 02:02, Robert Carlson
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 03:14, John Mallinckrodt
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 03:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 05:26, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 07:17, Mojca Cepic
Student Question, 10/28/1999 09:23, James Harris
Re: Ancient Premise, 10/28/1999 10:28, Karl Trappe
Re: Student Question, 10/28/1999 11:03, John Denker
Re: ex falso quodlibet, 10/28/1999 12:03, John Denker
Re: Ancient Premise, 10/28/1999 12:33, Jim Diamond
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 12:43, Jim Green
Re: off-topic: gerund vs. participle, 10/28/1999 12:53, felina
Fw: update.454, 10/28/1999 13:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: ex falso quodlibet, 10/28/1999 13:42, Karl Trappe
Re: ex falso quodlibet, 10/28/1999 13:52, Karl Trappe
Re: Axion? Huh?, 10/28/1999 14:31, William Beaty
Re: ex falso quodlibet, 10/28/1999 14:51, Richard Grandy
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/28/1999 15:02, Doug Craigen
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 16:21, Brian McInnes
Re: Axion? Huh?, 10/28/1999 16:56, Daniel Schroeder
why pseudowork?, 10/28/1999 17:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/28/1999 18:14, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/28/1999 18:25, Brian McInnes
Published today in local paper, FYI; re evolution, 10/28/1999 19:11, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Student Question, 10/28/1999 19:20, Larry Cartwright
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 19:37, John Denker
Re: off-topic: gerund/participle/verbal noun, 10/28/1999 20:07, brian whatcott
Re: Student Question, 10/28/1999 20:19, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Axion? Huh?, 10/28/1999 20:20, Dennis Krause
Re: Ancient Premise, 10/28/1999 20:22, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/28/1999 20:42, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/28/1999 20:50, John Denker
Re: off-topic: grammar, 10/28/1999 21:36, Robert Curtis
Re: mystery photomultiplier, 10/28/1999 21:37, brian whatcott
Re: off-topic: grammar, 10/28/1999 22:08, John Denker
Re: work done by friction, 10/28/1999 22:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: ex contradictione quodlibet, 10/28/1999 23:11, John Denker
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/28/1999 23:22, Richard Grandy
Leigh's paradox (Re: work done by friction), 10/28/1999 23:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/29/1999 00:08, Hugh Haskell
Science vs. religion, 10/29/1999 00:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 00:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: ex falso quodlibet, 10/29/1999 02:57, Miguel A. Santos
Re: work done by friction, 10/29/1999 03:10, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 03:18, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 05:01, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 05:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 07:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 08:02, John Mallinckrodt
[no subject], 10/29/1999 08:21, felina
Re: work done by friction, 10/29/1999 08:46, brian whatcott
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 09:09, John Denker
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 09:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 10:15, Richard Tarara
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 10:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 11:03, Richard Tarara
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 11:14, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 11:28, John Mallinckrodt
Why do we care about work?, 10/29/1999 11:51, John Mallinckrodt
macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom (was: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 12:13, Joel Rauber
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 12:18, Bob Sciamanda
Re: PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 12:28, Bob Sciamanda
test-lost /late posts, 10/29/1999 12:31, Bob Sciamanda
Re: no thermal energy, 10/29/1999 12:35, John Denker
from NSTA: Straight A's Act; science in Title I, 10/29/1999 12:38, Jane Jackson
PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 12:51, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 12:55, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 13:00, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 13:09, Jim Green
Re: no thermal energy, 10/29/1999 13:23, Jim Green
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/29/1999 13:27, Zach Wolff
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 13:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 13:29, Jim Green
Re: PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 13:47, John Denker
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 13:47, Richard Tarara
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 13:59, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/29/1999 14:23, Richard Tarara
Re: no thermal energy, 10/29/1999 14:39, John Denker
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/29/1999 15:27, Karl Trappe
Re: PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 15:27, Richard Tarara
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 16:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Software for Question Bank, 10/29/1999 16:14, romanza
testing, 10/29/1999 16:22, romanza
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 16:29, Michael Burns-Kaurin
Re: the wall recoils, 10/29/1999 16:44, John Denker
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 16:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/29/1999 17:23, paul o johnson
Re: why pseudowork?, 10/29/1999 18:18, John Mallinckrodt
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom (was: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 18:21, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Software for Question Bank, 10/29/1999 18:25, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Is pseudowork "bad" work?, 10/29/1999 19:59, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 20:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom (was: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 20:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 20:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 20:53, Jim Green
Re: Is pseudowork "bad" work?, 10/29/1999 21:00, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 21:40, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 22:02, brian whatcott
Re: PseudoWork ????, 10/29/1999 22:40, Bob Sciamanda
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/29/1999 22:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom (was: why pseudowork(NOT), 10/29/1999 23:32, Bob Sciamanda
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom (was: whypseudowork(NOT), 10/29/1999 23:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 00:13, Bob Sciamanda
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 00:17, brian whatcott
[no subject], 10/30/1999 01:11, felina
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 01:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 12:28, Robert A Cohen
irreversible adiabatic compression of an ideal gas, 10/30/1999 12:48, Carl E. Mungan
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/30/1999 13:28, John Denker
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 14:11, brian whatcott
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 14:12, John Denker
Re: irreversible adiabatic compression of an ideal gas, 10/30/1999 14:20, brian whatcott
Re: irreversible adiabatic compression of an ideal gas, 10/30/1999 16:48, John Denker
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/30/1999 17:37, Doug Craigen
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/30/1999 18:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: irreversible adiabatic compression of an ideal gas, 10/30/1999 20:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/30/1999 22:06, Zach Wolff
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 22:42, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/30/1999 22:50, A. R. Marlow
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/31/1999 00:12, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 01:20, John Denker
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/31/1999 02:47, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/31/1999 08:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 08:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 09:58, Shapiro, Mark
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 10:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 11:08, John Denker
Re: Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 11:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 12:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 12:40, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/31/1999 12:46, Rick Tarara
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 12:56, Rick Tarara
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 13:02, brian whatcott
Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 13:19, John Mallinckrodt
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 13:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 16:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 17:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 17:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 17:41, John S. Denker
This Week, 10/31/1999 18:03, Jim Green
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 18:03, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 18:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 18:17, Jim Green
Re: This Week, 10/31/1999 18:23, Shapiro, Mark
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 18:23, Rick Tarara
Re: Where are the girls?, 10/31/1999 18:30, Shapiro, Mark
mini Y2K?, 10/31/1999 18:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 18:41, Jim Green
Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 10/31/1999 18:55, Jim Green
Re: mini Y2K?, 10/31/1999 18:59, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 19:04, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Why do we care about heat?, 10/31/1999 19:08, Jim Green
Re: why pseudowork (NOT), 10/31/1999 19:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: mini Y2K?, 10/31/1999 19:16, brian whatcott
Re: mini Y2K?, 10/31/1999 19:18, Jim Green
Re: mini Y2K?, 10/31/1999 21:16, brian whatcott
Re: Off topic: Humans, Robots and Religion, 10/31/1999 21:44, Zach Wolff

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Mail converted by MHonArc