Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of August, 1999

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Search Archives

Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/01/1999 10:13, John Denker
Re: A ball in a rotating dish, 08/01/1999 10:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Time Units, 08/01/1999 11:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Time Units, 08/01/1999 11:33, K. Lee Lerner
Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 08/01/1999 15:33, brian whatcott
Time Units, 08/01/1999 16:07, Jim Green
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 16:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 16:44, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Time Units, 08/01/1999 16:54, Leigh Palmer
PHYS-L Attachments Policy (was Re: misconceptions (physics of flight)), 08/01/1999 17:09, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 17:22, Jim Green
Re: PHYS-L Attachments Policy (was Re: misconceptions (physics of flight)), 08/01/1999 17:24, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 17:25, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Time Units, 08/01/1999 19:37, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 19:45, Leigh Palmer
Au Recherche Du Temps Perdu: was Time Units, 08/01/1999 20:24, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/01/1999 22:29, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 02:01, William Beaty
Re: A ball in a dish, 08/02/1999 02:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 03:41, William Beaty
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 08/02/1999 06:28, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 09:00, Ben deMayo
Re: A ball in a dish, 08/02/1999 10:54, Robert A Cohen
Re: unsuscribe, 08/02/1999 11:44, CADENA RUIZ LUIS ERNESTO
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 08/02/1999 11:47, Robert A Cohen
Re: A ball in a dish., 08/02/1999 11:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 12:37, William Beaty
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 13:18, Jim Green
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 08/02/1999 13:37, Robert A Cohen
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 14:39, Jim Green
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 15:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 16:46, paul o johnson
Re: A ball in a rotating dish, 08/02/1999 18:07, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/02/1999 19:18, Doug Craigen
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 19:29, William Beaty
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 20:22, Zach Wolff
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/02/1999 21:35, Jim Green
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 22:17, KATHERINE TODD
Re: Time Units, 08/02/1999 22:50, KATHERINE TODD
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 00:18, William Beaty
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 00:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 01:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: A ball in a dish., 08/03/1999 01:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 03:02, William Beaty
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 03:28, Leigh Palmer
refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/03/1999 06:22, John Denker
[no subject], 08/03/1999 10:20, David Guerra
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/03/1999 11:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Philosophy and History of Science Series, 08/03/1999 12:48, brian whatcott
Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 13:26, Jim Green
Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), 08/03/1999 14:26, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: A quotation, 08/03/1999 14:37, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 16:02, William Beaty
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 16:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 16:35, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 17:17, John S. Denker
Applied Physics, 08/03/1999 18:08, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: Gases, vapors and the like, 08/03/1999 19:14, Glenn Knapp
Re: teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, 08/03/1999 20:35, William Beaty
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 21:43, Jim Green
Re: Energy, etc, 08/03/1999 23:47, brian whatcott
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 01:15, John Denker
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 01:39, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 01:41, Leigh Palmer
simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 03:48, Ludwik Kowalski
electostatic confinment?, 08/04/1999 06:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 10:14, Michael N. Monce
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 10:38, Robert A Cohen
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 11:09, Jim Green
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 11:19, Robert Curtis
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 12:17, Jim Green
Re: Banana Plug Tool, 08/04/1999 13:50, Kate Cleary
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 13:50, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 14:22, Leigh Palmer
Canoe hoist, 08/04/1999 14:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Applied Physics, 08/04/1999 14:43, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Nuclear spectroscopy, 08/04/1999 16:09, K. Lee Lerner
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 16:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 16:30, Robert Curtis
Re: electostatic confinment?, 08/04/1999 16:42, brian whatcott
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 17:11, Bea or Rick Tarara
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 17:14, Bea or Rick Tarara
Scenery, 08/04/1999 17:43, Jim Green
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 18:08, Michael Edmiston
Re: simple pendulum, 08/04/1999 18:29, Michael Edmiston
Re: h**t, 08/04/1999 18:51, John Denker
Re: electostatic confinment?, 08/04/1999 18:59, William Beaty
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/04/1999 19:45, John Denker
Re: Energy, etc, 08/04/1999 19:46, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, 08/04/1999 20:13, John Denker
conical pendulum, 08/04/1999 20:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 00:26, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: h**t, 08/05/1999 00:29, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 00:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 00:50, Brian McInnes
Re: Scenery, 08/05/1999 00:52, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 00:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 01:19, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 02:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 03:48, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Nuclear spectroscopy, 08/05/1999 04:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 04:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newsflash, 08/05/1999 07:00, K. Lee Lerner
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 07:34, John Denker
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 08:40, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 08:49, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 09:04, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 09:12, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Displacements, 08/05/1999 09:13, John Cooper
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 09:50, Gordon Smith
Energy follow-up: Nonlinear Thermodynamics, 08/05/1999 10:09, K. Lee Lerner
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 10:18, Michael Edmiston
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 10:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 10:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: simple pendulum, 08/05/1999 11:19, James G. Pengra
Newsflash, 08/05/1999 11:49, Gordon Smith
Re: h**t, 08/05/1999 12:02, Roger Haar
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 12:08, Leigh Palmer
Re: Nuclear spectroscopy, 08/05/1999 12:30, Michael Edmiston
Re: h**t, 08/05/1999 12:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 15:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 15:40, Jim Green
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 15:40, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 15:50, K. Lee Lerner
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 15:52, Jim Green
Re: Nuclear spectroscopy, 08/05/1999 15:55, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 16:07, Jim Green
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 17:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 17:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: refutation of the nonreality of energy, 08/05/1999 17:36, Bea or Rick Tarara
The reality of charge, 08/05/1999 18:08, Leigh Palmer
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/05/1999 18:43, Doug Craigen
Textbook goofs, 08/05/1999 18:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 19:16, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 19:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: The reality of charge, 08/05/1999 21:08, Chuck Britton
inexact science versus caprice, 08/05/1999 21:20, John Denker
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 21:45, Jim Green
Re: Textbook goofs, 08/05/1999 21:54, brian whatcott
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 22:13, brian whatcott
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 22:18, brian whatcott
Re: inexact science versus caprice, 08/05/1999 22:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/05/1999 22:51, Bea or Rick Tarara
Re: "simple" pendulum, 08/05/1999 23:37, Bob Sciamanda
Work-energy theorem, 08/05/1999 23:56, Ian Sefton
amphigory: what is missing?, 08/06/1999 00:15, John
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 01:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Ampere's law applied, 08/06/1999 01:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: Ampere's law applied, 08/06/1999 01:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Ampere's law applied, 08/06/1999 02:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc, 08/06/1999 03:07, Brian McInnes
Re: Fiber Optic current measurement., 08/06/1999 05:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Ampere's law applied, 08/06/1999 08:32, brian whatcott
Re: amphigory: what is missing?, 08/06/1999 09:15, brian whatcott
Rambling morning note and Chuck Britton's comment, 08/06/1999 09:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: Ampere's law applied, 08/06/1999 09:31, Leigh Palmer
Fiber Optic current measurement., 08/06/1999 10:26, Chuck Britton
Re: Fiber Optic current measurement., 08/06/1999 10:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 11:20, Michael Edmiston
Re: Fiber Optic current measurement., 08/06/1999 12:05, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 12:09, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 12:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 12:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy, etc, 08/06/1999 13:42, Jim Green
Why care?, 08/06/1999 14:40, Rob Davies
Re: Energy, etc. (third law/forces/work), 08/06/1999 14:47, Bea or Rick Tarara
Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/06/1999 16:06, David Bowman
Re: Energy, etc, 08/06/1999 16:15, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 18:36, Bea or Rick Tarara
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/06/1999 18:50, Doug Craigen
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/06/1999 18:55, Leigh Palmer
eclipse and pendulums, 08/06/1999 22:16, William Beaty
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy, 08/07/1999 00:22, John Denker
Archimedes meets the Tare Bar., 08/07/1999 01:02, brian whatcott
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/07/1999 07:40, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/07/1999 09:40, Ludwik Kowalski
F=m*a before kinematics?, 08/07/1999 12:31, Ludwik Kowalski
The rabbi's copout, 08/07/1999 13:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy, 08/07/1999 13:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/07/1999 18:28, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: Energy, etc, 08/07/1999 22:21, Robert A Cohen
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/08/1999 03:25, David Bowman
Re: Energy, etc, 08/08/1999 03:32, Leigh Palmer
Coriolis, 08/08/1999 10:24, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "Simple" pendulum, 08/08/1999 10:30, Ludwik Kowalski
typing corrections, 08/08/1999 11:46, Ludwik Kowalski
erratum Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/08/1999 20:26, David Bowman
off topic: echoes of Columbine, 08/08/1999 20:46, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/09/1999 04:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Decceleration and sign of the acceleration componet, 08/09/1999 04:43, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/09/1999 04:43, Brian McInnes
Re: Coriolis, 08/09/1999 04:44, Brian McInnes
Re: Energy, etc, 08/09/1999 04:44, Brian McInnes
Re: Coriolis, 08/09/1999 06:06, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/09/1999 06:24, Brian McInnes
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/09/1999 07:20, Brian McInnes
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy, 08/09/1999 07:20, John Denker
Lagrangians, Nth-rank tensors, and Nth derivatives, 08/09/1999 07:51, John Denker
Re: Energy, etc, 08/09/1999 09:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: coriolis situation, 08/09/1999 10:11, Ludwik Kowalski
Sign Conventions, 08/09/1999 10:25, Doug Craigen
Re: Sign Conventions, 08/09/1999 10:36, Spagna Jr., George
Re: off topic: echoes of Columbine, 08/09/1999 10:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/09/1999 10:51, John Denker
Re: Coriolis, 08/09/1999 11:16, Roger Haar
Re: "Simple pendulum", 08/09/1999 12:16, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Coriolis, 08/09/1999 15:19, Robert A Cohen
coriolis situation, 08/09/1999 15:23, Michael Moloney
PIRA members and prospective members, 08/09/1999 15:44, Jerry Hester
Bridge Collapse, 08/09/1999 16:09, Michael Edmiston
Acoustic resonance, 08/09/1999 16:36, Charlie Crummer
Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/09/1999 16:55, romanza
Re: coriolis situation, 08/09/1999 17:18, Brian McInnes
Re: PIRA members and prospective members, 08/09/1999 17:24, Greg Puskar
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/09/1999 17:27, John S. Denker
Graf Spee and Graf Spee, 08/09/1999 18:43, Michael Moloney
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/09/1999 20:06, William Beaty
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/09/1999 20:08, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/09/1999 22:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Coriolis, 08/09/1999 23:53, John Mallinckrodt
another passive maglev, 08/10/1999 00:00, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions FAQ, 08/10/1999 01:04, William Beaty
Re: Graf Spee and Graf Spee, 08/10/1999 01:47, Brian McInnes
Re: Graf Spee and Graf Spee, 08/10/1999 01:51, Robert Curtis
Mathematical HTML tags, 08/10/1999 01:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (long), 08/10/1999 02:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 04:49, Darwin Z. Palima
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 05:17, Ludwik Kowalski
New Physics Paradigm, 08/10/1999 06:50, stephen mooney
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 08:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 08:58, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 10:27, Jim Green
Re: Acoustic resonance, 08/10/1999 11:37, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: Energy, etc, 08/10/1999 11:41, Robert A Cohen
Re: PIRA members and prospective members, 08/10/1999 11:51, Sampere
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 12:47, Jim Green
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 13:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 13:59, Charlie Crummer
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 15:04, Jim Green
Re: Energy, etc, 08/10/1999 15:11, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/10/1999 15:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Acoustic resonance, 08/10/1999 15:51, brian whatcott
Re: Acoustic resonance, 08/10/1999 16:02, Gordon Smith
Re: Acoustic resonance, 08/10/1999 16:33, brian whatcott
Re: Acoustic resonance, 08/10/1999 16:37, Gordon Smith
Re: Energy, etc, 08/10/1999 18:55, William Beaty
Re: coriolis situation, 08/11/1999 00:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 01:38, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Energy, etc, 08/11/1999 03:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Coriolis, 08/11/1999 05:23, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 06:52, brian whatcott
Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 08:51, romanza
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 09:44, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 09:47, Michael N. Monce
Re: Energy, etc, 08/11/1999 10:04, Lois Breur Krause
Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 11:37, Carl C. Gaither
Re: Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 11:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 11:55, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 12:23, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 12:35, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 12:43, brian whatcott
Re: Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 12:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:00, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:14, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:17, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Coriolis, 08/11/1999 13:22, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:34, Chuck Britton
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:40, Brian W. Rich
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 13:44, Michael N. Monce
Re[2]: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 14:12, Philip Zell
Re: coriolis situation, 08/11/1999 14:44, Robert A Cohen
Re: Can this be true?, 08/11/1999 15:54, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 16:17, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 16:22, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 16:46, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 17:59, Michael Edmiston
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight: OOPS!, 08/11/1999 18:17, William Beaty
2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/11/1999 18:36, Jane Jackson
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 18:38, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 19:12, William Beaty
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/11/1999 19:59, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: F=m*a before kinematics?, 08/11/1999 20:08, Peter Schoch
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/11/1999 20:20, Joseph Bellina
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/11/1999 20:23, Keith Tipton
AAPTApparatus Competition [ A cart and a fan (not exactly physics of flight) ], 08/11/1999 20:25, Michael Moloney
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/11/1999 22:09, brian whatcott
lift, 08/11/1999 23:46, Alvin V. Flores
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 08:09, Spagna Jr., George
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 08:50, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 09:11, Sampere
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 09:44, Lois Breur Krause
Re: lift, 08/12/1999 09:47, Chuck Britton
Re: lift, 08/12/1999 09:55, Lois Breur Krause
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 11 Aug 1999 to 12 Aug 1999, 08/12/1999 10:22, Glenn A. Carlson
Perseids meteor shower tonight!, 08/12/1999 10:28, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 10:40, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Can this be true?, 08/12/1999 10:44, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 10:59, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Can this be true?, 08/12/1999 11:13, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 11:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: Perseids meteor shower tonight!, 08/12/1999 11:56, Rondo Jeffery
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 12:23, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 12:36, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 12:50, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Teaching E&M before Mechanics, 08/12/1999 13:12, Owen von Kugelgen
Re: Teaching E&M before Mechanics, 08/12/1999 13:36, Ed Schweber
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 13:41, Sampere
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 13:52, Sampere
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 13:54, Sampere
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 14:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 15:29, William Beaty
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/12/1999 15:59, William Beaty
Re: AAPTApparatus Competition [ A cart and a fan (not exactly physics of flight) ], 08/12/1999 16:10, brian whatcott
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 16:48, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 17:03, Sampere
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 17:16, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/12/1999 17:38, brian whatcott
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 19:02, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Can this be true?, 08/12/1999 20:24, Bob Sciamanda
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/12/1999 21:54, John C. Park
duck's quack, 08/12/1999 22:01, Jayasanker_J
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 00:32, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Can this be true?, 08/13/1999 01:42, John Mallinckrodt
Re: F=m*a before kinematics?, 08/13/1999 04:23, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 06:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: H2O, 08/13/1999 07:49, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 08:13, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 08:43, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 09:06, John C. Park
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 09:15, Joseph Bellina
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 09:27, Joseph Bellina
Re: duck's quack, 08/13/1999 10:38, Thomas O'Neill
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 11:49, Michael Edmiston
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007! - PS, 08/13/1999 12:06, Michael Edmiston
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/13/1999 12:40, Jim Green
Re: AAPTApparatus Competition [ A cart and a fan (not exactly physics of flight) ], 08/13/1999 12:47, Thomas Greenslade, Jr.
Re: Can this be true?, 08/13/1999 12:53, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/13/1999 12:59, Richard Tarara
H2O, 08/13/1999 13:14, Jim Green
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 13:15, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 13:22, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/13/1999 13:23, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 13:33, Sampere
Re: AAPTApparatus Competition [ A cart and a fan (not exactly physics of flight) ], 08/13/1999 13:35, Herbert H Gottlieb
Energy <=> Money, 08/13/1999 14:02, Timothy Folkerts
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 14:16, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 14:20, Joseph Bellina
Re: Energy <=> Money, 08/13/1999 14:33, Richard Tarara
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 14:34, Joseph Bellina
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 14:36, Joseph Bellina
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 15:23, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Energy, etc (fwd), 08/13/1999 15:23, William Beaty
Re: H2O, 08/13/1999 15:35, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/13/1999 16:24, William Beaty
Re: Energy <=> Money, 08/13/1999 16:35, Rob Davies
the "sound barrier" again, 08/13/1999 16:52, Mark Sylvester
Re: Energy <=> Money, 08/13/1999 17:01, William Beaty
Re: H2O, 08/13/1999 17:36, brian whatcott
[Fwd: The Scout Report -- August 13, 1999 -- HTML Version] (fwd), 08/13/1999 18:41, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: lift (correct or otherwise), 08/13/1999 18:48, John Denker
relative angle of attack, 08/13/1999 19:14, John Denker
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/13/1999 19:28, Brian McInnes
Re: Physics of Flight: inferring the pressure, 08/13/1999 19:28, John Denker
Re: H2O vs. Wiedemann-Franz, 08/13/1999 19:40, John Denker
Re: Physics of Flight; air deflection, 08/13/1999 20:02, John Denker
Re: H2O, 08/13/1999 21:22, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report -- August 13, 1999 -- HTML Version] (fwd), 08/13/1999 21:44, Chuck Britton
energy etc. +- precise language, 08/13/1999 23:47, John Denker
Re: H2O, 08/13/1999 23:47, Doug Craigen
Northern Lights (Re: Perseids meteor shower tonight!), 08/14/1999 00:23, Doug Craigen
Re: lift requires vortices, 08/14/1999 00:35, John Denker
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/14/1999 00:44, John Denker
Re: pedagogical use of helicopters, 08/14/1999 01:05, John Denker
Re: relative angle of attack, 08/14/1999 01:08, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/14/1999 02:57, brian whatcott
Re: pedagogical use of helicopters, 08/14/1999 03:04, William Beaty
Re: Physics of Flight; air deflection, 08/14/1999 03:16, William Beaty
Re: energy etc. +- precise language, 08/14/1999 04:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Electron size?, 08/14/1999 04:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: electron, proton size, 08/14/1999 07:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: misconceptions: 2D model of 3D flight, 08/14/1999 08:34, John Denker
Re: Physics of Flight; circulation and vortices, 08/14/1999 08:43, John Denker
Re: ailerons and adverse yaw, 08/14/1999 09:36, John Denker
Electron size?, 08/14/1999 09:59, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: electron, proton size, 08/14/1999 11:06, John Denker
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/14/1999 11:23, brian whatcott
Re: energy etc. +- precise language, 08/14/1999 11:24, John Denker
Re: energy etc. +- precise language, 08/14/1999 11:42, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: adverse yaw, 08/14/1999 11:43, John Denker
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/14/1999 11:49, William Beaty
Re: electron, proton size, 08/14/1999 11:51, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: adverse yaw, 08/14/1999 12:13, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: adverse yaw, 08/14/1999 12:40, John Denker
Re: electron, proton size, 08/14/1999 13:31, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: electron, proton size, 08/14/1999 14:05, John Denker
Making Contact with Pioneers, 08/14/1999 16:15, brian whatcott
Re: Making Contact with Pioneers - Corrigendum, 08/15/1999 10:45, brian whatcott
Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report -- August 13, 1999 -- HTML Version] (fwd), 08/16/1999 08:34, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/16/1999 11:30, Richard Tarara
your presentation in san antonio, 08/16/1999 12:21, Keith Tipton
Re: your presentation in san antonio--OOPS, 08/16/1999 12:29, Keith Tipton
Re: your presentation in san antonio--OOPS, 08/16/1999 14:04, Daniel Schroeder
weight of a bird in a cage, 08/16/1999 14:18, Carl E. Mungan
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 08/16/1999 15:08, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/16/1999 16:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: H2O, 08/16/1999 16:58, Michael Edmiston
Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, 08/16/1999 17:03, Alex Burr
how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/16/1999 17:30, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/16/1999 17:32, Michael Edmiston
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/16/1999 18:34, Herschel Neumann
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/16/1999 21:29, Chuck Britton
Relativity and Theories, 08/16/1999 22:05, KATHERINE TODD
Lost Lab Period, 08/16/1999 22:14, David Simmons
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/16/1999 23:22, KATHERINE TODD
Re: General Relativity, 08/16/1999 23:44, John Denker
Re: Newtonian gravitational field energy (very long), 08/16/1999 23:51, David Bowman
Re: Lost Lab Period, 08/17/1999 00:12, Jerome Epstein
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/17/1999 00:15, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/17/1999 00:15, Jerome Epstein
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/17/1999 00:44, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/17/1999 00:52, Leigh Palmer
is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/17/1999 01:07, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/17/1999 01:39, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/17/1999 01:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/17/1999 08:48, John Denker
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/17/1999 08:55, John Denker
Re: Lost Lab Period, 08/17/1999 09:07, Carl Schneider
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/17/1999 09:39, Lois Breur Krause
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/17/1999 09:44, Lois Breur Krause
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/17/1999 10:15, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 10:32, John Denker
Re: General Relativity, 08/17/1999 11:20, Lois Breur Krause
what is science?, 08/17/1999 11:25, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 12:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: Eclipses and the orbital plane of the Moon, 08/17/1999 12:59, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 13:07, John Denker
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 13:51, John Denker
Re: Lost Lab Period, 08/17/1999 14:32, Tim Burgess
What is science?, 08/17/1999 17:25, kyle forinash
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 17:28, paul o johnson
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/17/1999 17:38, Jerome Epstein
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/17/1999 19:07, John Denker
Re: what is science?, 08/17/1999 19:37, Hugh Haskell
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/17/1999 21:32, KATHERINE TODD
Thanks, 08/17/1999 21:40, KATHERINE TODD
Re: Thanks, 08/17/1999 22:29, Hugh Haskell
Re: how do you manage? (was Re: [Fwd: The Scout Report...), 08/17/1999 23:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Thanks, 08/18/1999 00:03, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 01:16, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 01:20, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 02:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 02:45, Bob Sciamanda
To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 05:02, William Beaty
Re: misconceptions: 2D model of 3D flight, 08/18/1999 05:17, William Beaty
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 06:43, brian whatcott
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 06:52, brian whatcott
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 07:28, brian whatcott
Re: Relativity and Theories, 08/18/1999 08:06, Lois Breur Krause
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 08:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Thanks, 08/18/1999 08:37, Spagna Jr., George
Re: misconceptions: 2D model of 3D flight, 08/18/1999 08:48, John Denker
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 08:55, John Denker
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 09:10, John Denker
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 09:13, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 10:17, Lois Breur Krause
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 10:21, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 10:27, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 10:33, Joel Rauber
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 10:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 11:11, Lois Breur Krause
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 11:19, Hugh Haskell
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 11:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 11:33, Mary and Bill Allsopp
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 11:53, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 11:54, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 12:14, paul o johnson
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 12:17, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 12:27, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 12:27, paul o johnson
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 12:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 13:13, brian whatcott
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 14:00, John Denker
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 15:19, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 15:34, Stefan Jeglinski
Some possibly interesting resources, 08/18/1999 17:40, Michael Moloney
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/18/1999 18:01, Michael Edmiston
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 18:17, Michael Edmiston
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame? (long), 08/18/1999 19:18, John Mallinckrodt
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/18/1999 20:11, William Beaty
Evolution and Creationism, 08/18/1999 21:06, Kenneth J. Morgan
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/18/1999 22:40, William Beaty
Re: is free-fall an inertial frame?, 08/18/1999 22:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 00:13, Stefan Jeglinski
Aug 99 PHYS-L Tech Posting and CIVILITY REMINDER, 08/19/1999 01:05, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/19/1999 01:28, brian whatcott
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 02:06, K. Lee Lerner
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 02:10, K. Lee Lerner
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/19/1999 03:45, William Beaty
Re: To hover, a reaction-motor pushes on the earth?, 08/19/1999 06:01, William Beaty
Re: Physics of Flight, 08/19/1999 07:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 08:11, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 08:24, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 09:37, Peter Schoch
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 11:12, Michael Edmiston
Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 11:17, Harvey S. Picker
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 11:42, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 12:41, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 12:59, David Abineri
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 13:14, Michael Edmiston
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 13:40, William Beaty
Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 13:43, Peter Mccardell
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 13:45, John Denker
Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 13:56, Wes Davis
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 14:06, Richard Tarara
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 15:21, Michael Edmiston
textbook prices, 08/19/1999 15:53, Robert J. Beichner
Re: textbook prices, 08/19/1999 16:43, Peter Mccardell
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 16:54, Doug Craigen
Re: Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 17:13, Owen von Kugelgen
Re: Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 17:23, John Gastineau
Re: Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 17:53, Daniel Schroeder
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 18:04, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 18:36, Phil P. Johnson
Re: Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 18:45, Daniel Schroeder
The Myth of Superheated Steam, 08/19/1999 19:14, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
Re: Textbook prices, 08/19/1999 19:29, Peter Schoch
barking up the downwash tree, 08/19/1999 20:04, John Denker
The smell of rain, 08/19/1999 20:25, Cliff Parker
Acceleration and curves, 08/19/1999 20:46, Cliff Parker
Evolution and Creationism, 08/19/1999 21:38, David Abineri
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/19/1999 21:57, Peter Mccardell
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/19/1999 22:08, Cliff Parker
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/19/1999 22:41, Peter Mccardell
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/19/1999 23:21, brian whatcott
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/19/1999 23:41, Terry Hallaran
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/19/1999 23:59, brian whatcott
re-define "reaction motor???", 08/20/1999 00:04, William Beaty
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 00:11, James Watson
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 00:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 00:36, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 00:59, Scott Rippetoe
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/20/1999 01:32, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 01:45, Phil P. Johnson
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 01:47, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 01:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 02:21, K. Lee Lerner
Translational lift in helicopters, 08/20/1999 02:30, Bob Yeend
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 05:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Translational lift in helicopters, 08/20/1999 05:27, John Denker
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/20/1999 05:58, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 06:22, David Bowman
Re: Misconceptions: Physics of Flight, 08/20/1999 06:23, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 06:45, Homer B. James
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 07:03, Peter Schoch
Re: celestial momentum farce, 08/20/1999 07:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Translational lift in helicopters, 08/20/1999 07:54, brian whatcott
Mechanisms of Comological & Biological Evolution, 08/20/1999 09:09, K. Lee Lerner
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 09:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 10:08, Phil P Johnson
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 10:19, Peter Mccardell
Re: The Myth of Superheated Steam, 08/20/1999 10:20, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 10:27, Peter Mccardell
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 10:46, Chuck Britton
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/20/1999 10:47, Joseph Bellina
Re: textbook prices, 08/20/1999 10:52, Steven D. Richardson
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 11:13, Joel Rauber
Re: Textbook prices, 08/20/1999 11:17, Joel Rauber
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 11:34, Gordon Smith
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 11:39, Michael N. Monce
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 11:44, Gordon Smith
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 11:51, Jerome Epstein
Re: celestial momentum farce, 08/20/1999 12:16, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 12:45, Phil P. Johnson
John Denker vs. Anderson/Eberhardt, 08/20/1999 12:47, William Beaty
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 12:48, Alex. F. Burr
Re: celestial momentum farce, 08/20/1999 12:51, Peter Mccardell
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/20/1999 12:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: 30 seconds per century? (was Re: Evolution and Creationism), 08/20/1999 13:50, brian whatcott
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:00, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: helicopter not equal rocket, 08/20/1999 14:03, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:05, David J. Hamilton
30 seconds per century? (was Re: Evolution and Creationism), 08/20/1999 14:06, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:07, William Beaty
Re: textbook prices, 08/20/1999 14:24, Harvey S. Picker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:26, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:39, Richard Tarara
Re: Acceleration and curves, 08/20/1999 14:48, Hugh Haskell
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 14:49, Hugh Haskell
Elastic Energy Transfers, 08/20/1999 14:55, Carr, John
Many Thanks, 08/20/1999 15:03, Kenneth J. Morgan
Re[2]: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 15:42, Philip Zell
MS - Outlook, 08/20/1999 16:32, Joel Rauber
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 16:42, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Travesty credentials, 08/20/1999 16:51, John Denker
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 17:05, paul o johnson
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 17:15, paul o johnson
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 17:21, John Denker
Re: name collision (was Evolution and Creationism), 08/20/1999 17:31, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 18:05, Joel Rauber
Re: textbook prices, 08/20/1999 18:10, Daniel Schroeder
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 18:23, Cliff Parker
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 18:35, Peter Mccardell
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 18:37, Cliff Parker
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 18:47, Brian W. Rich
Re: The Myth of Superheated Steam, 08/20/1999 19:02, brian whatcott
Re: The smell of rain, 08/20/1999 19:39, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Travesty of paleogeomagnetism, 08/20/1999 20:49, John Denker
Re: Travesty of big-bang energetics, 08/20/1999 20:56, John Denker
but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/20/1999 21:06, William Beaty
Re: Travesty of quantum decoherence, 08/20/1999 21:15, John Denker
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/20/1999 21:32, John Denker
Re: Aug 99 PHYS-L Tech Posting and CIVILITY REMINDER, 08/20/1999 21:33, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 21:49, Daniel L. MacIsaac
"longer wings" defeats "reaction motor"???, 08/20/1999 21:58, William Beaty
the "Bernoulli-ist" religious belief, 08/20/1999 22:18, William Beaty
physics can be so nonlinear, 08/20/1999 22:35, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism/Thank you/3rd Law, 08/20/1999 22:49, Dorrie Bright
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 23:15, Glenn Knapp
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/20/1999 23:23, Jerome Epstein
Re: Travesty credentials, 08/20/1999 23:29, Jerome Epstein
Re: Travesty credentials, 08/20/1999 23:29, Jerome Epstein
Re: 2 million teachers in 2007!, 08/20/1999 23:35, Glenn Knapp
Re: Travesty of quantum decoherence, 08/20/1999 23:36, Jerome Epstein
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/20/1999 23:55, William Beaty
Re: Evolution and Creationism/Thank you/3rd Law, 08/21/1999 00:32, Bob Sciamanda
Re: physics can be so nonlinear, 08/21/1999 00:33, William Beaty
Re: Travesty of big-bang energetics, 08/21/1999 00:56, David Bowman
Re: what pushes up on the *wing*?, 08/21/1999 01:01, John Denker
Re: The smell of rain, 08/21/1999 01:21, Andy O'Neil
Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 02:09, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/21/1999 07:01, William Beaty
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/21/1999 08:45, William Beaty
Re: what pushes up on the *wing*?, 08/21/1999 08:46, David_Anderson
Denker vs Anderson and Eberhardt, 08/21/1999 08:52, David_Anderson
Re: The Tergiversation of the Trichotomy: A Sermon, 08/21/1999 09:02, Robert W. Harris
Re: vortices can be so nonlinear, 08/21/1999 09:11, John Denker
Re: The Myth of Superheated Steam, 08/21/1999 09:17, brian whatcott
Re: big-bang energetics, 08/21/1999 09:31, John Denker
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 09:42, Cliff Parker
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 10:02, Glenn Knapp
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, 08/21/1999 10:36, John Denker
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 12:21, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Travesty of big-bang energetics, 08/21/1999 12:33, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 13:05, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, 08/21/1999 13:15, David_Anderson
The earth pushing on a wing, revisited, 08/21/1999 13:22, David_Anderson
Re: big-bang energetics, 08/21/1999 13:30, David Bowman
Re: Denker vs Anderson and Eberhardt, 08/21/1999 13:33, Jerome Epstein
Re: Denker vs Anderson and Eberhardt, 08/21/1999 14:12, David_Anderson
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 14:40, Cliff Parker
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, revisited, 08/21/1999 14:46, David_Anderson
Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 14:52, David_Anderson
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/21/1999 15:31, David Abineri
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, 08/21/1999 15:39, John Denker
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 15:58, Larry Smith
Y2K, 08/21/1999 16:27, Jim Green
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 16:48, Jim Green
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 16:55, David_Anderson
Links to San Antonio talks, 08/21/1999 16:57, Michael Moloney
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/21/1999 16:59, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 17:11, Stan Dodds
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/21/1999 17:12, David_Anderson
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/21/1999 17:52, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 18:17, Jim Green
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/21/1999 18:56, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 21:32, Samuel Held
Re: Y2K, 08/21/1999 21:47, Samuel Held
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/21/1999 22:41, David_Anderson
Re: Y2K-NOT and glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 00:53, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 02:16, Leigh Palmer
Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 02:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Physics of Flight (and Anderson/Eberhardt), 08/22/1999 02:55, William Beaty
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 03:03, William Beaty
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/22/1999 04:45, William Beaty
Re: but does the *earth* push up on the *wing*?, 08/22/1999 05:20, William Beaty
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 05:33, William Beaty
FLYING MACHINES was physics of flight, 08/22/1999 06:01, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics of Flight (and Anderson/Eberhardt), 08/22/1999 06:11, Ludwik Kowalski
John Denker's "upwash contributes lift", 08/22/1999 06:20, William Beaty
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 06:42, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Newcomb's paper, 08/22/1999 07:25, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: FLYING MACHINES was physics of flight, 08/22/1999 08:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 08:12, William Beaty
Re: Newcomb's paper, 08/22/1999 09:06, William Beaty
Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/22/1999 09:08, John Denker
Re: upwash contributes lift, 08/22/1999 09:42, John Denker
Re: Evolution in schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/22/1999 10:06, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 10:44, Rick Tarara
Re: Physics of Flight (and Anderson/Eberhardt), 08/22/1999 11:18, Rick Tarara
levels of belief, 08/22/1999 11:38, John Denker
Teaching students to THINK: Modeling Method, 08/22/1999 11:39, Jane Jackson
Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/22/1999 11:41, David_Anderson
Re: Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 11:56, Chuck Britton
Re: upwash etc., 08/22/1999 12:00, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 12:10, Glenn Knapp
Re: FLYING MACHINES was physics of flight, 08/22/1999 12:32, John Denker
Re: Textbook prices, 08/22/1999 13:23, Thomas O'Neill
Bernoulli Equation: Facts and Misconceptions, 08/22/1999 13:33, David_Anderson
Re: Physics of Flight (and Anderson/Eberhardt), 08/22/1999 13:45, Rick Tarara
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 13:50, Rick Tarara
Re: The Tergiversation of the Trichotomy: A Sermon, 08/22/1999 14:04, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Evolution in schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/22/1999 14:08, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: levels of belief, 08/22/1999 14:12, Cliff Parker
Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/22/1999 14:33, William Beaty
Re: Evolution/Theory, 08/22/1999 15:44, Joel Rauber
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 15:56, William Beaty
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, 08/22/1999 16:03, brian whatcott
Re: Physics of Flight (and Anderson/Eberhardt), 08/22/1999 16:09, William Beaty
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 16:21, Hugh Haskell
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/22/1999 16:41, William Beaty
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, revisited, 08/22/1999 16:41, brian whatcott
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, revisited, 08/22/1999 16:55, David_Anderson
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 17:08, brian whatcott
Re: Evolution in schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/22/1999 17:47, Glenn Knapp
Re: Glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 18:00, Jim Green
Re: Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 18:01, brian whatcott
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 22 Aug 1999 - Special issue, 08/22/1999 18:18, Dorrie Bright
Re: Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 18:21, David_Anderson
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 22 Aug 1999 - Special issue, 08/22/1999 18:38, brian whatcott
Re: Y2K-NOT and glass does not flow, 08/22/1999 18:40, Jim Green
Re: Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 19:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: levels of belief, 08/22/1999 20:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: Light bulbs, 08/22/1999 20:55, Chuck Britton
Re: Links to San Antonio talks, 08/22/1999 21:05, Rick Tarara
Re: refutation of the scoop theory, revisited, 08/22/1999 21:28, brian whatcott
Science and Religion, 08/22/1999 21:30, Carl C. Gaither
FLYING MACHINES to "thrust", 08/22/1999 22:28, Tim Burgess
Re: The smell of rain, 08/22/1999 22:41, Doug Craigen
The Tergiversation of the Trichotomy: A Sermon, 08/23/1999 00:23, brian whatcott
The Source of "Phil's" List, 08/23/1999 00:48, Doug Craigen
Re: The Source of "Phil's" List, 08/23/1999 01:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: The smell of rain, 08/23/1999 03:06, Sampere
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/23/1999 08:30, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
style, 08/23/1999 08:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Travesty credentials, 08/23/1999 08:40, Lois Breur Krause
Re: The smell of rain, 08/23/1999 08:45, Lois Breur Krause
strong theories, weak theories, not-even-wrong theories, 08/23/1999 08:55, John Denker
Re: style, 08/23/1999 08:59, Ludwik Kowalski
threads based on outside references, 08/23/1999 10:09, Richard Tarara
Re: strong theories, weak theories, not-even-wrong theories, 08/23/1999 10:35, Hugh Haskell
end of thread: physics, non-physics, and airplanes, 08/23/1999 10:58, John Denker
Re: Evolution in schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/23/1999 11:07, Robert W. Harris
sayings, acronym collections, 08/23/1999 11:14, John Denker
Re: threads based on outside references, 08/23/1999 11:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: strong theories, weak theories, not-even-wrong theories, 08/23/1999 11:27, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/23/1999 11:30, Robert W. Harris
Re: strong theories, weak theories, not-even-wrong theories, 08/23/1999 11:34, John Denker
inet acronyms, 08/23/1999 11:45, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Evolution in schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/23/1999 11:59, Stefan Jeglinski
Rebuttal of Denker's rubuttal, 08/23/1999 12:42, David_Anderson
NOAH'S FLOOD (book review), 08/23/1999 13:13, Jane Jackson
Downwash reflecting up?, 08/23/1999 13:36, David_Anderson
Re: style, 08/23/1999 14:27, Spagna Jr., George
Re: strong theories, weak theories, not-even-wrong theories, 08/23/1999 14:37, Lois Breur Krause
Re: The Source of "Phil's" List, 08/23/1999 15:14, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Downwash reflecting up?, 08/23/1999 15:18, Tim Burgess
Re: style, 08/23/1999 16:52, Brian W. Rich
message fwd from Scott Eberhardt, 08/23/1999 17:43, William Beaty
Re: name collision (was Evolution and Creationism), 08/23/1999 18:12, paul o johnson
planes flying abreast: the Newtonian solution, 08/23/1999 20:18, William Beaty
Re: end of thread: physics, non-physics, and airplanes, 08/23/1999 21:25, William Beaty
Re: end of thread: physics, non-physics, and airplanes, 08/23/1999 22:02, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Schools (was Re: Evolution...), 08/23/1999 22:56, Jerome Epstein
Re: Acronyms, 08/23/1999 23:04, Jerome Epstein
Physics differences, 08/23/1999 23:09, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Light bulbs, 08/23/1999 23:42, Stefan Jeglinski
Newton's later "research", 08/23/1999 23:58, Jim Braunsdorf
Re: The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 00:04, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Physics differences, 08/24/1999 00:14, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Newton's later "research", 08/24/1999 00:19, Richard Grandy
Re: Newton's later "research", 08/24/1999 00:21, Bob Sciamanda
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 00:23, Ludwik Kowalski
The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 00:35, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 00:54, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: end of thread: physics, non-physics, and airplanes, 08/24/1999 00:56, William Beaty
Re: The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 01:03, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Light bulbs, 08/24/1999 01:25, Leigh Palmer
lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 01:25, William Beaty
15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 02:05, William Beaty
Re: Light bulbs, 08/24/1999 02:15, William Beaty
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 04:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 04:23, Brian McInnes
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/24/1999 04:55, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: style, 08/24/1999 06:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: planes flying abreast: the Newtonian solution, 08/24/1999 06:58, David_Anderson
Re: intentionally distorting arguments, 08/24/1999 07:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 07:09, David_Anderson
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 07:15, David_Anderson
Newest 'Science Teacher' focusus on safety, 08/24/1999 07:48, Keith Tipton
direct vs. indirect forces, 08/24/1999 07:57, John Denker
Re: direct vs. indirect forces, 08/24/1999 09:17, Brian McInnes
Re: direct vs. indirect forces, 08/24/1999 09:50, John Denker
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/24/1999 10:07, paul o johnson
Benchmark problems, 08/24/1999 10:10, Jim Harpel
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 10:38, William Beaty
Re: Y2K-NOT and glass does not flow, 08/24/1999 10:40, paul o johnson
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 10:49, William Beaty
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 10:53, William Beaty
Re: Light bulbs, 08/24/1999 10:55, paul o johnson
re-defining "coanda effect", 08/24/1999 11:18, William Beaty
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 11:22, William Beaty
Re: style, 08/24/1999 11:26, paul o johnson
Re: style, 08/24/1999 11:30, Spagna Jr., George
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 11:32, David_Anderson
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 11:36, Lois Breur Krause
intentionally distorting arguments, 08/24/1999 12:21, William Beaty
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 12:38, William Beaty
Re: The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 12:56, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Air Track Experiments, 08/24/1999 13:19, David Abineri
Re: 15 minute classroom version..., 08/24/1999 13:40, Richard Tarara
Re: Air Track Experiments, 08/24/1999 13:51, Richard Tarara
Re: The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 13:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: The air track experiment, 08/24/1999 14:22, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
what's got into beaty?, 08/24/1999 14:59, William Beaty
Re: intentionally distorting arguments, 08/24/1999 15:39, William Beaty
Who should judge?, 08/24/1999 16:44, William Beaty
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/24/1999 16:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Newton's later "research", 08/24/1999 17:03, Joseph Bellina
Re: intentionally distorting arguments, 08/24/1999 17:34, Robert A Cohen
Re: Newton's later "research", 08/24/1999 17:47, Hugh Haskell
Re: Newton's later "research", 08/24/1999 18:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: Light bulbs, 08/24/1999 20:00, William Beaty
Air Track Experiments, 08/24/1999 21:18, David Abineri
Re: Air Track Experiments, 08/24/1999 22:54, John Gastineau
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 08/24/1999 23:51, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Religion/science & coincidence, 08/25/1999 02:22, William Beaty
Re: intentionally distorting arguments, 08/25/1999 04:10, William Beaty
Re: Light bulbs, 08/25/1999 07:57, Chuck Britton
Re: Air Track Experiments, 08/25/1999 10:01, Richard Tarara
Mystery Object, 08/25/1999 11:16, Jim Green
Re: Mystery Object, 08/25/1999 12:47, Leigh Palmer
falling pie plate (was: ... *earth* vs. *wing*), 08/25/1999 13:27, Carl E. Mungan
Re: style, 08/25/1999 14:47, paul o johnson
Re: style, 08/25/1999 15:06, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Mystery Object, 08/25/1999 15:12, paul o johnson
et cetera, 08/25/1999 15:33, paul o johnson
Re: et cetera, 08/25/1999 16:19, Richard Tarara
Would You Believe?, 08/25/1999 16:19, Van E. Neie
Re: style, 08/25/1999 17:55, brian whatcott
Re: Mystery Object, 08/25/1999 19:46, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: style, 08/25/1999 19:52, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
rapidity, 08/25/1999 19:55, Rob Davies
Re: Light bulbs, 08/25/1999 20:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: style, 08/25/1999 20:32, Doug Craigen
CORRECTION Re: end of thread: physics, non-physics, and airplanes, 08/25/1999 21:42, William Beaty
Re: et cetera, 08/25/1999 21:52, Bob Sciamanda
keeping those darned planets apart, 08/25/1999 22:37, William Beaty
Re: style, 08/25/1999 22:46, brian whatcott
Re: keeping those darned planets apart, 08/25/1999 23:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: rapidity, 08/26/1999 02:54, Brian McInnes
help, 08/26/1999 07:03, Kevin M. Dudley
Re: keeping those darned planets apart, 08/26/1999 07:54, Peter Schoch
Re: help, 08/26/1999 07:54, brian whatcott
Re: style, 08/26/1999 08:02, Lois Breur Krause
Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 08:15, William Beaty
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 10:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: The air track experiment:Cooked Data!, 08/26/1999 10:47, Dr. James Mackey
Re: The air track experiment:Cooked Data!, 08/26/1999 10:56, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 10:58, William Beaty
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 11:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: The air track experiment:Cooked Data!, 08/26/1999 11:26, Hugh Haskell
Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/26/1999 12:33, William Beaty
Re: The air track experiment:!Cooked Data, 08/26/1999 12:46, brian whatcott
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 12:56, William Beaty
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/26/1999 13:15, Richard Tarara
Re: Cooked Data, 08/26/1999 13:16, John S. Denker
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 13:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: The air track experiment:!Cooked Data, 08/26/1999 13:53, Hugh Haskell
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/26/1999 14:56, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: style, 08/26/1999 15:20, paul o johnson
Re: et cetera, 08/26/1999 15:52, paul o johnson
Re: style, 08/26/1999 16:03, paul o johnson
Superheated Steam, 08/26/1999 16:04, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
Re: et cetera, 08/26/1999 16:07, paul o johnson
Superheated Steam, 08/26/1999 16:14, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
Re: Would You Believe?, 08/26/1999 16:44, paul o johnson
Re: what's got into beaty?, 08/26/1999 17:18, Michael Edmiston
How do crystal radios really work, 08/26/1999 17:40, William Beaty
Stupid Software Problem, 08/26/1999 17:53, paul o johnson
Explanation of recent message., 08/26/1999 18:03, Michael Edmiston
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 18:04, Gary Karshner
Re: How do crystal radios really work, 08/26/1999 18:05, Shapiro, Mark
Explanation of recent message., 08/26/1999 18:52, Michael Edmiston
Re: How do crystal radios really work, 08/26/1999 21:02, William Beaty
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 21:09, William Beaty
Re: Would You Believe?, 08/26/1999 21:39, Tom DeBrita
Re: Would You Believe?, 08/26/1999 21:54, Rick Tarara
Re: keeping those darned planets apart, 08/26/1999 22:10, Glenn Knapp
Re: et cetera, 08/26/1999 22:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: keeping those darned planets apart, 08/26/1999 22:20, Bob Sciamanda
Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/26/1999 22:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/26/1999 23:12, Rex Snyder
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/26/1999 23:24, Allen Miller
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/26/1999 23:42, William Beaty
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 00:21, Glenn Knapp
Re: Stupid Software Problem, 08/27/1999 01:16, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: keeping those darned planets apart, 08/27/1999 01:19, William Beaty
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 01:25, Stefan Jeglinski
Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/27/1999 01:42, William Beaty
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/27/1999 01:45, William Beaty
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/27/1999 01:48, William Beaty
quick note on air-parcel motion, 08/27/1999 02:38, William Beaty
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 06:21, John Denker
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 06:34, Robert W. Harris
Re: Would You Believe?, 08/27/1999 06:55, brian whatcott
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 10:15, Joseph Bellina
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 10:27, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 10:37, Richard Tarara
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 10:45, John Gastineau
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/27/1999 11:32, Richard Tarara
Re: How do crystal radios really work, 08/27/1999 12:11, Gary Karshner
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 12:23, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 12:31, Leigh Palmer
Sig Figs, et al, 08/27/1999 12:55, Van E. Neie
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 13:11, Joseph Bellina
amusement park accidents, 08/27/1999 13:20, Keith Tipton
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/27/1999 14:02, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/27/1999 15:37, Richard Tarara
Ball Lightning??, 08/27/1999 15:54, Chuck Britton
Superheated Steam, 08/27/1999 16:03, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 17:28, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 17:32, Joseph Bellina
Re: Energy-sucking EM antennas, 08/27/1999 17:42, Jim Green
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/27/1999 18:05, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 19:37, Cliff Parker
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/27/1999 19:46, Cliff Parker
Re: Superheated Steam, 08/27/1999 21:53, brian whatcott
SI &c., 08/27/1999 23:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/28/1999 19:15, Clarence Bennett
Re: Superheated Steam, 08/28/1999 19:54, Clarence Bennett
Re: Ball Lightning??, 08/28/1999 22:02, William Beaty
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/28/1999 23:34, brian whatcott
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 08/29/1999 04:16, William Beaty
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/29/1999 04:28, William Beaty
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/29/1999 04:31, William Beaty
Submit your favorite physics sites (read for more), 08/29/1999 13:36, Keith Tipton
Re: SI &c., 08/29/1999 14:37, Daniel Schroeder
Re: SI &c., 08/29/1999 15:49, Mark Sylvester
Re: SI &c., 08/29/1999 16:18, paul o johnson
Tacoma Revisited, 08/29/1999 17:28, brian whatcott
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/29/1999 20:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/29/1999 21:19, paul o johnson
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/29/1999 21:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 08/30/1999 08:06, Lois Breur Krause
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 08:23, Lois Breur Krause
Re: SI &c., 08/30/1999 08:42, Robert A Cohen
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 09:03, Robert A Cohen
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 09:06, David Bowman
Evidence for supersymmetry found ?, 08/30/1999 10:23, Inge H. A. Pettersen
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 10:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 10:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 10:40, Robert A Cohen
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 10:41, Chuck Britton
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 10:44, Richard Tarara
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 10:55, John Denker
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 10:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 11:12, Robert A Cohen
Re: Superheated Steam, 08/30/1999 12:13, Philip Zell
hello!, 08/30/1999 12:23, Daniel Lozkov
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 13:06, Bob Sciamanda
[Fwd: CSSP's Bromley- "No Science, No Surplus"], 08/30/1999 13:31, Charley Myles
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 13:53, Leigh Palmer
[Fwd: Deadlines !] (fwd), 08/30/1999 14:24, Charley Myles
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 14:34, Michael Edmiston
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 14:59, Michael Edmiston
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 15:08, Leigh Palmer
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 15:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 15:56, paul o johnson
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 16:12, paul o johnson
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 16:14, Richard Tarara
Re: style, 08/30/1999 16:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 16:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 16:57, Michael Edmiston
Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, 08/30/1999 17:42, paul o johnson
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/30/1999 19:55, Glenn Knapp
Re: SI &c., eh?, 08/30/1999 19:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, 08/30/1999 20:08, Rick Tarara
Re: resolution vs. precision, 08/30/1999 22:31, paul o johnson
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/31/1999 08:09, Robert A Cohen
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 08/31/1999 08:26, Robert A Cohen
Sorry to put this on the list - but I wish to reach Clements, 08/31/1999 11:43, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, 08/31/1999 12:02, Ivan E. Rouse
DVM - VTVM - etc, 08/31/1999 12:10, Michael Edmiston
Re: Evidence for supersymmetry found ?, 08/31/1999 14:55, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Evidence for supersymmetry found ?, 08/31/1999 14:58, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: DVM - VTVM - etc, 08/31/1999 15:01, Stan Dodds
precision/accuracy, 08/31/1999 17:35, Ken Fox
Uncertainty Question, 08/31/1999 17:46, Ken Fox
Re: Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, 08/31/1999 18:15, paul o johnson
Re: precision/accuracy, 08/31/1999 18:16, Mark Sylvester
Re: Uncertainty Question, 08/31/1999 18:27, Mark Sylvester
Re: Uncertainty Question, 08/31/1999 18:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Uncertainty Question, 08/31/1999 19:19, Peter Schoch
Tornados and Lightning, 08/31/1999 19:29, Glenn Knapp
Re: precision/accuracy, 08/31/1999 19:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: Tornados and Lightning, 08/31/1999 23:09, brian whatcott
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 09/01/1999 21:10, Ludwik Kowalski

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Mail converted by MHonArc