Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
--Boundary_(ID_wxxfb+Nr/iTtuL4k2PmlaQ)them,
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
At 07:37 PM 25/08/99 -0700, you wrote:
Here's an idea which I'd never encountered before. Suppose we have two
masses (planets) far out in space away from other matter. They will
obviously fall together via gravitational attraction. If we wished to
keep them apart, you would have to create a "contact force" between
themright? Create some sort of repulsion, or maybe erect a tower to hold
bullets.apart?
There's another way.
Mount a machine-gun on one of the masses. Fire bits of rock as
Adjustfire them at the other planet so that they collide inelastically.
thethe firing rate and velocity of the bullets until the planets hover at
hitsdesired spacing.
Is there any repulsive contact-force between the planets? No. NO?!!!!
WEEEEEEEIRD!!!!!!
Firing of the gun creates a "recoil" force-pair, and when the bullet
kindthe other planet, it creates an "impact" force-pair, but there is no
theof force repelling the planets apart at all. The gun accelerates a
bullet, and the other planet decellerates it by just the same amount.
Mass leaks continuously from one planet to the other via the
bullet-stream. KE is injected into the bullets and extracted at the
target, so there is a net flow of energy as well.
This looks like a conservation of momentum deal to me. Their momentum in
one direction would have to "cancel out" the momentum of the planet Tomake
this work, you'd need to fire one heck of a lot of bullets really fast.This
means that the mass of your planet is going to be decreasing. At thesame
time, the mass of the other planet is going to be increasing.Eventually you'd
run out of planet - you made it all into bullets that you fired into theother
world.
That would be weird.
Glenn