Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
... A bird (or an aircraft) is fundamentally
different than a balloon because the earth pushes upwards upon the balloon
and causes the balloon to stay aloft, while this is not true of birds or
aircraft (or rockets.)
I was responding to somebody's earlier message that stated that the
exhaust is *required* to apply force to the planet, and that if it did
not, Newton's laws would be violated.....
(And maybe I misunderstood it in the first place.)
... Now suppose we fly an aircraft over the earth at a height which
is small, but which is well outside of the "ground effect" distance. In
that case the wings will launch a pair of wake-vortices downwards. The
earth will not experience a significant force until that vortex-pair
collides with the ground.
I agree that at great altitudes the downwards motion of the aircraft
wake-vortices must gradually be slowed by interacting with the atmosphere,
and this will cause the atmosphere to push downwards upon the earth.
However, if the aircraft is fairly close to the ground, the "pressure" it
applies to the earth is in the form of a "footprint" where the vortex-pair
is crashing into the ground and being disrupted.
William J. Beaty