Phys-L List Archive (by Thread) of September, 1999

Search Archives

• precision?, Ed Eckel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: precision?, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: precision?, John Denker
  • Re: precision?, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: precision?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: precision?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: precision?, Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: precision?, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: precision?, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: precision?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: precision/accuracy, Tom Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: precision/accuracy, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: precision/accuracy, Lois Breur Krause
• Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, Robert A Cohen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Uncertainty Question, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Molecular Collisions, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Molecular Collisions, Sampere
  • Re: Molecular Collisions, Clarence Bennett
• Accuracy vs. precision, was: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, Lois Breur Krause
• Re: Evolution and Creationism, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Evolution and Creationism, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), Herbert H Gottlieb
• Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, Robert A Cohen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, William Beaty
• Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, Robert A Cohen
• Physics In Medical School (fwd), Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., John Denker
  • Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., Leigh Palmer
• test-delete, Miguel A. Santos
• physics "art", Spagna Jr., George
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: physics "art", Gordon Smith
• Re: rapidity, Rob Davies
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rapidity, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: rapidity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: rapidity, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: rapidity, David Bowman
  • Re: rapidity, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, paul o johnson
• Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, David Bowman
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, David Bowman
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, David Bowman
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, John S. Denker
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, David Bowman
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Greg Puskar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Rick Strickert
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Nils Sorensen
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Greg Puskar
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, brian whatcott
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, Chuck Britton
• Human error, Michael Edmiston
• LAB SUPPLYS, Peter Mccardell
• Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, David Roberts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, David Roberts
  • Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, Leigh Palmer
• pub physics, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Definitions, Timothy Folkerts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Definitions, Brian McInnes
  • Re: Definitions, Jim Green
• Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Jim Ealy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, brian whatcott
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Mark Sylvester
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, brian whatcott
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Mark Sylvester
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Peter Schoch
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, brian whatcott
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, brian whatcott
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Peter Schoch
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Mark Sylvester
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: weight of a bird in a cage, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: SI &c., eh?, Alex Burr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SI &c., eh?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: SI &c., eh?, Larry Smith
• text book prices, Peter Mccardell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: text book prices, Ivan E. Rouse
• Precision and the kilogram, Cliff Parker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Precision and the kilogram, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Precision and the kilogram, brian whatcott
  • Re: Precision and the kilogram, Gary Karshner
• Re: energy, work, heat, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Jim Green
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: energy, work, heat, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: energy, work, heat, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: energy, work, heat, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., Cliff Parker
  • Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., Leigh Palmer
• phone scam, Sampere
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: phone scam, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: phone scam, David J. Hamilton
• Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• unsubscribe, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• [Alert]US House K12 Science & Math Education, Michael Lach
• Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations (long), David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations (long), Stefan Jeglinski
• Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat (corrected), JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: 4D conservation of energy etc., John Denker
• brainwave?, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: weight of a fly in a box, John Denker
• Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, John Denker
  • Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, John Denker
  • Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, John Mallinckrodt
• How do I change my address?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• YP Waves (plug), Yves Pelletier
• bird in a cage/flight, Greg Puskar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: bird in a cage/flight, brian whatcott
• Project Starshine, Tom Ford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Project Starshine, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Project Starshine, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Project Starshine, Tom Ford
  • Re: Project Starshine, Leigh Palmer
• energy, momentum, qualitative reasoning, John Denker
• [no subject], Alvin V. Flores
• Re: Heat & Energy, brian whatcott
• [no subject], Margaret Mazzolini
• Re: heat is a form of energy, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, David Bowman
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Chuck Britton
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Jim Green
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Chuck Britton
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Jim Green
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Jim Green
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, John Denker
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, David Bowman
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Robert Carlson
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, David Bowman
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Cliff Parker
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, brian whatcott
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, crawford j maccallum
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: heat is a form of energy, William Beaty
• Re: heat Phlogiston, Timothy Folkerts
• On http://www.monmouth.com/~jsd/fly/vortex/, William Beaty
• heat versus deja vu, Margaret Mazzolini
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: heat versus deja vu, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Re: "heat" is NOT a form of "energy", Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "heat" is NOT a form of "energy", Jim Green
• Large neodymiums on eBay, William Beaty
• denker vs. beaty: a subtle(?) point, William Beaty
• Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, William Beaty
• Removing Bill B's scientific credibility entirely, William Beaty
• Rockets and Ground Reaction - Revisited, brian whatcott
• Electrostatics problem, Thomas Walkiewicz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Thomas Walkiewicz
  • Re: Electrostatics problem -Reply, Hasan Fakhruddin
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Peter Schoch
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Electrostatics problem - PS, Michael Edmiston
• Q vs "heat", Jim Green
• Wave Question, romanza
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wave Question, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Wave Question, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Wave Question, romanza
  • Re: Wave Question, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Wave Question, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Wave Question, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Wave Question, William Beaty
• interference question, Michael Moloney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • interference question, romanza
  • Re: interference question, John Denker
  • Re: interference question, John Denker
  • Re: interference question, Michael Moloney
• AAPT abstract deadline, links to last summers' meeting, Michael Moloney
• Re: Brian Green Featured on ABC Nightline in Prime Time, Teresa Hein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Brian Green Featured on ABC Nightline in Prime Time, Warren Hein
• Re: subscribing to the list, JoAnn Manor
• solution to the world's energy needs, David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, brian whatcott
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, Chuck Britton
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, David Bowman
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, Taylor Stafford
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, William Beaty
  • Re: solution to the world's energy needs, Joseph Bellina
• Re: conservation of energy not substance, John Denker
• "Pure Energy", Jim Green
• [no subject], fred brace
• [no subject], Cliff Parker
• Airplane Drag, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Airplane Drag, John Denker
  • Re: Airplane Drag, Jim Green
  • Re: Airplane drag, John Denker
  • Re: Airplane drag, Jim Green
  • Re: Airplane drag, John Denker
  • Re: Airplane Drag, Jim Green
  • Re: Airplane Drag, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • Re: Airplane Drag, John Denker
  • Re: Airplane Drag, brian whatcott
  • Re: Airplane Drag, Jim Green
  • Re: Airplane Drag, brian whatcott
  • Re: Airplane Drag, William Beaty
• [no subject], Leigh Palmer
• Light Mill?, Chuck Britton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Light Mill?, Mojca Cepic
  • Re: Light Mill?, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Light Mill?, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Light Mill?, Mojca Cepic
  • Re: Light Mill?, William Beaty
  • Re: Light Mill?, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: Light Mill?, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Light Mill?, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Light Mill?, William Beaty
  • Re: Light Mill?, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Robert A Cohen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Leigh Palmer
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), John Mallinckrodt
• [no subject], Robert W. Harris
• Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), brian whatcott
  • Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Robert A Cohen
• [no subject], Herbert H Gottlieb
• [no subject], Glenn Knapp
• [no subject], Leigh Palmer
• Heat and Energy, Carl C. Gaither
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Heat and Energy, Jim Green
  • Re: Heat and Energy, Chuck Britton
• Do photons exist?, William Beaty
• Re: your mail, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: your mail, Cliff Parker
• Lissajous figure demo, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lissajous figure demo, Ed Schweber
• Cliff Parker's question (was: heat is a form of energy), Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cliff Parker's question (was: heat is a form of energy), Cliff Parker
• The flat Earth, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The flat Earth, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Flat Earth, Jim Green
  • Re: The flat Earth, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: The flat Earth, Jim Green
  • Re: The flat Earth, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: The flat Earth, Gary Karshner
  • Re: The flat Earth, William Beaty
• The speed of sound, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Cliff Parker's question, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cliff Parker's question, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Cliff Parker's question, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Cliff Parker's question, Cliff Parker
• Re: forces on the winds, John Denker
• URL correction - IP Lissajous simulation, Ed Schweber
• internal energy, Barlow Newbolt
• Subject, Jerry Hester
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Subject, Karl Trappe
• Electrostatics problem thanks, Thomas Walkiewicz
• making sound waves visible, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: making sound waves visible, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: making sound waves visible, William Beaty
  • Re: making sound waves visible, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: making sound waves visible, William Beaty
• Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, William Beaty
  • Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, Hugh Haskell
• Humorous Article, Doug Craigen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Humorous Article, Jim Green
  • Re: Humorous Article, Doug Craigen
• FW: Logal.net Back to School--and to Hurricanes, Cindy Schwarz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FW: Logal.net Back to School--and to Hurricanes, Catherine Hafner
• Re: Electrostatics problem & citation, Peter Schoch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Electrostatics problem & citation, Bob Sciamanda
• Time Conservation, paul o johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Time Conservation, Peter Mccardell
• MS Windows Virus-like Security Gaps, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
• Stability analysis for L4/L5, John Mallinckrodt
• The Wrights was (solution ...world's energy...)[long], brian whatcott
• Re: heat is a form of energy, & Re: Time conservation, Leigh Palmer
• Localizable energy, William Beaty
• Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Michael Edmiston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, John Gastineau
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Steven T. Ratliff
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Jim Green
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, Keith Tipton
• Re: stopwatches and laser pointers, William Beaty
• "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, Jim Green
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, John Gastineau
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, William Beaty
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, crawford j maccallum
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, William Beaty
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, William Beaty
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, Richard Tarara
  • Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, John Mallinckrodt
• List of Lists, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: List of Lists, John S. Denker
  • Re: List of Lists, Jim Green
  • Re: List of Lists, John S. Denker
  • Re: List of Lists, Doug Craigen
  • Re: List of Lists, William Beaty
  • Re: List of Lists, Chuck Britton
  • Re: List of Lists, Greg Clements
  • Re: List of Lists, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: List of Lists, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: List of Lists, William Beaty
• Correction! Re: $6 laser pointers (fwd), William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Correction! Re: $6 laser pointers (fwd), Richard Grandy
• Interesting articles, Hugh Haskell
• Drafting in Bicycle Races, Ed Schweber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, John Denker
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, brian whatcott
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, Douglass Goodale
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, brian whatcott
  • Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, brian whatcott
• Re: Letters of Rec. - Followup, Michael Edmiston
• Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, Steven T. Ratliff
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, John Denker
  • Re: Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, Joel Rauber
• Re: Drafting in Bicycles versus Boats, John Denker
• Physics Infomall CD, Laurent Hodges
• Re: teachers=magicians ?, Robert W. Harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: teachers=magicians ?, brian whatcott
  • teachers=magicians ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: teachers=magicians ?, Lois Breur Krause
• i,j,k, Barlow Newbolt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: i,j,k, brian whatcott
• Off-Topic:Non-Science Works of Priestley, brian whatcott
• Re: Bennett and his Volvo, Barlow Newbolt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bennett and his Volvo, Clarence Bennett
• Bicycles, trucks, trains, Laurent Hodges
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, brian whatcott
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, crawford j maccallum
• Re: i,j,k things., Gary Karshner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: i,j,k things., Michael Edmiston
  • Re: i,j,k things., Hanna Rudnicki
  • Re: i,j,k things., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: i,j,k things., Joel Rauber
  • Re: i,j,k things., Michael Edmiston
  • Re: i,j,k things., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: i,j,k things., John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: i,j,k things., Michael Edmiston
  • i,j,k things., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things., John Denker
  • Re: i,j,k things., Ken Caviness
  • Re: i,j,k things., Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: i,j,k things., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things., Robert Carlson
  • Re: i,j,k things., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things., Joel Rauber
• Re: i,j,k, units, vectors, etc., John Denker
• Optics Labs with Video Capture, Ivan E. Rouse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, Peter Mccardell
  • Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, Timothy S. Sullivan
  • Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, Don Stenton
• axes not required, John Denker
• String theory TV program tonight, Roger Freedman
• things to do with dry ice?, Stefan Jeglinski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Nils Sorensen
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Ted E. Dumm
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Norman Lohstreter
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, William Beaty
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, William Beaty
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, William Beaty
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Chuck Britton
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Cliff Parker
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Chuck Britton
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: things to do with dry ice?, Norman Lohstreter
• Re: i,j,k things, Glenn A. Carlson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: i,j,k things, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: i,j,k things, Joel Rauber
  • Re: i,j,k things, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k things, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: i,j,k things, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: i,j,k things, Darwin Z. Palima
• Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Peter Vajk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Jim Green
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, paul o johnson
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Roger Freedman
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, William Beaty
• Re: letters of recommendation, Lois Breur Krause
• low-tech diffraction pattern, Michael Moloney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: low-tech diffraction pattern, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: low-tech diffraction pattern, Dayton Labs
• Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, Michael Edmiston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, Joel Rauber
• Global Warming, Chuck Britton
• Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, John S. Denker
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, brian whatcott
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Gary Karshner
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Richard Grandy
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, Taylor Stafford
• laser light, Stefan Jeglinski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: laser light, William Beaty
• Re: i,j,k -- & please sign your postings, Joel Rauber
• dbar, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: dbar, Timothy Folkerts
• Met Images, brian whatcott
• Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, William Beaty
  • Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, Joseph Bellina
• Scanning problems, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scanning problems, brian whatcott
  • Re: Scanning problems, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Scanning problems, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Scanning problems, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • Re: Scanning problems, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Scanning problems, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Scanning problems, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Scanning problems, Peter Schoch
  • Re: Scanning problems, Peter Schoch
  • Re: Scanning problems, Doug Craigen
• NASA High-Risk Projects. [was Cold Fusion ...], brian whatcott
• Another new PC "virus": Count2K, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
• Re: NASA High-Malarkey Project, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NASA High-Malarkey Project, paul o johnson
• Re: cold fusion, Barlow Newbolt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • cold fusion, Barlow Newbolt
  • Re: cold fusion, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: cold fusion, Barlow Newbolt
  • Re: cold fusion, Chuck Britton
  • Re: cold fusion, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: cold fusion, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: cold fusion, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: cold fusion, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: cold fusion, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: cold fusion, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: cold fusion, Jim Green
  • Re: cold fusion, Jim Green
  • Re: cold fusion, Doug Craigen
  • Re: cold fusion, brian whatcott
  • Re: Cold fusion, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: cold fusion, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Cold fusion, Stefan Jeglinski
• Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, Spagna Jr., George
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, Margaret Mazzolini
• fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", Hugh Haskell
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", William Beaty
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", William Beaty
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", Michael Edmiston
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", VERNON DEWEES
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", R. kirk Bailey
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", William Beaty
  • Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", Lois Breur Krause
• Making Hay, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Kibbles & Bits, brian whatcott
• Re: A stinking explanation ?, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, John Mallinckrodt
  • A stinking explanation ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: A stinking explanation ?, John Mallinckrodt
• Conspiracy! Conspiracy!, William Beaty
• Arthur C. Clarke as skeptic, Chuck Britton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Arthur C. Clarke as skeptic, William Beaty
• enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, William Beaty
  • Re: enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, paul o johnson
• Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), John Mallinckrodt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), Joel Rauber
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), Stefan Jeglinski
• The Onion, William Beaty
• Re: dimensionless i,j,k things., John Denker
• Re: Being careful with dimensions, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Being careful with dimensions, Lois Breur Krause
• Being careful with directions, Chuck Britton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Van E. Neie
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Goddess Maia
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Being careful with directions, David Bowman
  • Re: Being careful with directions, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Being careful with directions, James Watson
• supplements to theory of reletivity, Daniel Lozkov
• Re: Whitcomb area rule (was: Drafting in bicycle races), John Denker
• physical pendulums, fred brace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: physical pendulums, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: physical pendulums, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: physical pendulums, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: physical pendulums, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: physical pendulums, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • Re: physical pendulums, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: physical pendulums, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, jmanor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, jmanor
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Uri Ganiel
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Stan Greenspoon
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Abul Kalam
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Peter Vajk
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Marc Kossover
  • Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, Peter Vajk
• Re: mars and venus, Spagna Jr., George
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • mars and venus, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: mars and venus, Chuck Britton
  • Re: mars and venus, David Bowman
  • Re: mars and venus, Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: mars and venus, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: mars and venus, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: mars and venus, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: mars and venus, David Bowman
  • Re: mars and venus, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: mars and venus, Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus, Mishra, Prasanna K., Ph.D. (Prasanna Mishra)
  • Re: mars and venus, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: mars and venus, Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: mars and venus, Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus, William Beaty
• i,j,k things, Math & Physics, Chuck Britton
• old msg Re: Evolution and Creationism, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: old msg Re: Evolution and Creationism, Ludwik Kowalski
• physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Ken Fox
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Ken Fox
• Nostalgia (Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races), Leigh Palmer
• Re: PHYS-L Digest - 22 Sep 1999 - Special issue, Glenn A. Carlson
• AP Calc/AP Phys question, Fran Poodry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AP Calc/AP Phys question, David Simmons
  • Re: AP Calc/AP Phys question, Jerome Epstein
• "first form an hypothesis...", crawford j maccallum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", David J. Hamilton
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Chuck Britton
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Robert A Cohen
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", William Beaty
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Michael Edmiston
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Bob Muir
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Chuck Britton
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Michael Edmiston
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Joel Rauber
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Leigh Palmer
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Robert Carlson
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Cliff Parker
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", felina
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", William Beaty
  • Re: "first form an hypothesis...", Leigh Palmer
• Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Cliff Parker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, David Bowman
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Sam Sampere
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Carl E. Mungan
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Carl E. Mungan
• Help, Timothy Sullivan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Help, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
• Dull Razors, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dull Razors, Karl Trappe
  • Re: Dull Razors, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Dull Razors, William Beaty
  • Re: Dull Razors, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Dull Razors, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Dull Razors, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Dull Razors, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Dull Razors, Karl Trappe
  • Re: Dull Razors, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Dull Razors, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Dull Razors, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Dull Razors, brian whatcott
  • Re: Dull Razors, Jim Green
  • Re: Dull Razors, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Dull Razors, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Dull Razors, Jim Green
  • Re: Dull Razors, Robert Carlson
  • Re: Dull Razors, Robert Carlson
  • Re: Dull Razors, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Dull Razors, David Kardelis
  • Re: Dull Razors, brian whatcott
  • Re: Dull Razors, brian whatcott
  • Re: Dull Razors, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: Dull Razors, Charley Myles
  • Re: Dull Razors, John Cooper
  • Re: Dull Razors, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Dull Razors, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Dull Razors, paul o johnson
  • Re: Dull Razors, Michael Edmiston
• R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Paolo Cavallo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joel Rauber
  • Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Ludwik Kowalski
• Scientific Method, Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scientific Method, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Scientific Method, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Scientific Method, Shapiro, Mark
  • Re: Scientific Method, Rick Strickert
  • Re: Scientific Method, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Scientific Method, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Scientific Method, Hugh Logan
  • Re: Scientific Method, Hugh Logan
  • Re: Scientific Method, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Scientific Method, William Beaty
• Longitudinal E-waves ?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Longitudinal E-waves ?, Mojca Cepic
  • Re: Longitudinal E-waves ?, Ludwik Kowalski
• College nowadays: was Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, Joel Rauber
• Re: Signature block, paul o johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Signature block, William Beaty
  • Re: Signature block, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Signature block, Karl Trappe
  • Re: Signature block, paul o johnson
  • Re: Signature block, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: Signature block, Chuck Britton
• Diffraction, Gerry White
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Diffraction, Gerry White
  • Re: Diffraction, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Diffraction, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Diffraction, brian whatcott
  • Re: Diffraction, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Diffraction, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Diffraction, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Diffraction, brian whatcott
  • Re: Diffraction, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Diffraction, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Diffraction, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Diffraction, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Diffraction, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Diffraction, brian whatcott
  • Re: Diffraction, crawford j maccallum
• Re: Another signature block, paul o johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another signature block, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• "Levitron" maglev device, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Levitron" maglev device, William Beaty
• WORD Equation editor help needed, Leon Leonardo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Ed Schweber
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Jim Green
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Peter Schoch
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Timothy S. Sullivan
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Peter Schoch
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, Peter Schoch
• Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, Chuck Britton
  • Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, Cliff Parker
• Re: Rainbow applet, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Rainbow applet, B.Surendranath Reddy
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Cliff Parker
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Rainbow applet, Leigh Palmer
• Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, Michael Moloney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, Ed Schweber
  • Re: Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, Peter Schoch
• Re: reality vs. science fair vs. hypothesis testing, John Denker
• Excerpt from What's New for Sep 24, 1999 (fwd), Charley Myles
• Re: Autosketch and Mathtype, Margaret Mazzolini
• Sustainability revisited - in memento mori, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sustainability revisited - in memento mori, Stefan Jeglinski
• Other Office resources, Rick Tarara
• Doing math versus editing it., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Doing math versus editing it., Robert Carlson
  • Re: Doing math versus editing it., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Doing math versus editing it., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Doing math versus editing it., Robert Carlson
  • Re: Doing math versus editing it., Margaret Mazzolini
• Netscape Communicator, Cliff Parker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Netscape Communicator, Leigh Palmer
• MSWord Editing Question, Mervin Koehlinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MSWord Editing Question, Rick Tarara
• Re: mars and venus (long), David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: mars and venus (long), Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus (long), William Beaty
  • Re: mars and venus (long), Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus (long), William Beaty
  • Re: mars and venus (long), Stephen Murray
  • Re: mars and venus (long), David Bowman
• test -- ignore, David Bowman
• Re: laser light [2], William Beaty
• Re: polarization of reflected/refracted waves, John Denker
• Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Allen Miller
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Dale Orth
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Richard Tarara
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Cliff Parker
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Ed Schweber
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, William Beaty
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Richard Tarara
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Fran Poodry
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Ed Schweber
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Bob Muir
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Richard Tarara
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Doug Craigen
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, Hugh Logan
• Simulations., Ludwik Kowalski
• Block Scheduling!?, Chuck Britton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Block Scheduling!?, Pat Keeney
  • Re: Block Scheduling!?, Norman Lohstreter
  • Re: Block Scheduling!?, Samuel Held
  • Re: Block Scheduling!?, Norman Lohstreter
• OHIO section/AAPT meeting Oct 16, Charlie Reno
• Quantum Leap, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Jim Green
  • Re: Quantum Leap, John Cooper
  • Re: Quantum Leap, John Denker
  • Re: Quantum Leap, William Beaty
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Lois Breur Krause
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Quantum Leap, brian whatcott
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: Quantum Leap, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Quantum Leaps, Barlow Newbolt
• AAPT people in the Northwest?, William Beaty
• Balls in a Funnel, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Balls in a Funnel, brian whatcott
• Re: max energy (was: Quantum Leap), John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: max energy (was: Quantum Leap), John Denker
• fluorescent tubes, Carl E. Mungan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fluorescent tubes, Chuck Britton
• Re: max energy (long...), brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: max energy (long...), Bob Sciamanda
• Scientists Criticize Textbooks (fwd), William Beaty
• Calculators and "Cheating", Doug Craigen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Calculators and "Cheating", Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Calculators and "Cheating", Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: Calculators and "Cheating", Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: Calculators and "Cheating", Mary and Bill Allsopp
• Re: The "basic three" (was: Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity), Doug Craigen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The "basic three" (was: Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity), John Mallinckrodt
• Colored Chalk for the Black Board, Tony Wayne