Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of September, 1999

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Search Archives

precision?, 09/01/1999 07:47, Ed Eckel
Re: precision/accuracy, 09/01/1999 08:00, Tom Ford
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 09/01/1999 08:08, Robert A Cohen
Re: Uncertainty Question, 09/01/1999 08:15, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Molecular Collisions, 09/01/1999 08:18, brian whatcott
Accuracy vs. precision, was: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 09/01/1999 08:29, Lois Breur Krause
Re: precision/accuracy, 09/01/1999 08:51, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 09/01/1999 10:07, Michael Edmiston
Re: Evolution and Creationism, 09/01/1999 10:11, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Molecular Collisions, 09/01/1999 10:13, Sampere
Re: lost msg: Re: bad-faith argumentation (was *earth* vs. *wing*), 09/01/1999 10:45, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 09/01/1999 11:45, Robert A Cohen
Re: precision/accuracy, 09/01/1999 11:45, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views pt. 2, 09/01/1999 12:02, Robert A Cohen
Physics In Medical School (fwd), 09/01/1999 12:26, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., 09/01/1999 13:05, John Denker
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 14:30, Miguel A. Santos
test-delete, 09/01/1999 14:42, Miguel A. Santos
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 14:52, John Denker
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 15:11, Michael Edmiston
physics "art", 09/01/1999 15:14, Spagna Jr., George
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 15:17, Rob Davies
Re: Significant figures - a Modest Proposal, 09/01/1999 15:37, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: physics "art", 09/01/1999 15:41, Gordon Smith
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 15:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 15:49, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Molecular Collisions, 09/01/1999 16:18, Clarence Bennett
Re: Innate Perverseness of E-mail Pages, 09/01/1999 16:28, paul o johnson
Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., 09/01/1999 17:15, Leigh Palmer
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 17:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 17:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 18:12, Bob Sciamanda
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 18:16, David Bowman
Re: rapidity, 09/01/1999 18:45, Bob Sciamanda
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 18:53, Timothy Folkerts
Re: precision?, 09/01/1999 23:41, Stefan Jeglinski
Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/02/1999 04:24, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: precision?, 09/02/1999 07:16, Robert A Cohen
Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 08:12, Greg Puskar
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 09:23, Rick Strickert
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 10:01, Nils Sorensen
Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., 09/02/1999 10:04, John Denker
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 10:08, Greg Puskar
Human error, 09/02/1999 10:13, Michael Edmiston
Re: Accuracy / precision / resolution / etc., 09/02/1999 10:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 10:47, Leigh Palmer
LAB SUPPLYS, 09/02/1999 11:20, Peter Mccardell
Re: precision?, 09/02/1999 11:42, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, 09/02/1999 11:50, David Roberts
pub physics, 09/02/1999 11:59, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 12:07, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Definitions, 09/02/1999 12:08, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, 09/02/1999 12:35, Leigh Palmer
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/02/1999 12:42, Jim Ealy
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 12:45, brian whatcott
Re: SI &c., eh?, 09/02/1999 13:01, Alex Burr
Re: SI &c., eh?, 09/02/1999 13:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/02/1999 13:43, Bob Sciamanda
text book prices, 09/02/1999 14:02, Peter Mccardell
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/02/1999 16:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: text book prices, 09/02/1999 16:26, Ivan E. Rouse
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 16:54, Chuck Britton
Re: Death due to Nitrous Oxide, 09/02/1999 16:59, Chuck Britton
Precision and the kilogram, 09/02/1999 20:50, Cliff Parker
Re: Precision and the kilogram, 09/02/1999 21:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: Precision and the kilogram, 09/02/1999 23:34, brian whatcott
Re: Definitions, 09/03/1999 03:57, Brian McInnes
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 08:12, John Denker
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 08:54, David Bowman
Re: Precision and the kilogram, 09/03/1999 09:03, Gary Karshner
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 11:09, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 11:39, David Bowman
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 12:01, David Bowman
Re: Definitions, 09/03/1999 12:14, Jim Green
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 12:22, Jim Green
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 12:34, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., 09/03/1999 12:58, brian whatcott
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 13:09, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 14:12, John S. Denker
Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., 09/03/1999 14:13, Leigh Palmer
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 14:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 14:37, Leigh Palmer
phone scam, 09/03/1999 14:45, Sampere
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 15:51, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, 09/03/1999 16:52, David Roberts
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 17:04, Leigh Palmer
Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., 09/03/1999 18:02, Cliff Parker
Re: SI &c., eh?, 09/03/1999 18:40, Larry Smith
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 18:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: Imprecision and the deciliter., 09/03/1999 18:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 19:09, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, 09/03/1999 19:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/03/1999 20:06, brian whatcott
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/03/1999 20:44, David Bowman
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/03/1999 20:55, Daniel Schroeder
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/04/1999 00:44, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Accuracy, etc.--astronomical measurements, 09/04/1999 02:25, Leigh Palmer
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/04/1999 07:25, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat, 09/04/1999 07:50, John Denker
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/04/1999 09:56, Stefan Jeglinski
unsubscribe, 09/05/1999 11:55, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
[Alert]US House K12 Science & Math Education, 09/05/1999 12:51, Michael Lach
Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat, 09/05/1999 13:50, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations (long), 09/05/1999 15:37, David Bowman
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/05/1999 16:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations (long), 09/05/1999 16:37, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/05/1999 18:12, Mark Sylvester
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/05/1999 19:19, brian whatcott
Re: 4D conservation of marbles, energy, work, heat (corrected), 09/05/1999 21:18, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: 4D conservation of energy etc., 09/05/1999 23:24, John Denker
Re: Symmetry in Lorentz transformation equations, 09/06/1999 02:48, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: phone scam, 09/06/1999 08:13, Lois Breur Krause
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 09:37, Mark Sylvester
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 09:52, Michael Edmiston
brainwave?, 09/06/1999 11:05, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 11:26, Peter Schoch
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 11:34, Lois Breur Krause
Re: weight of a fly in a box, 09/06/1999 11:39, John Denker
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 11:42, Lois Breur Krause
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 11:58, brian whatcott
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 12:09, Lois Breur Krause
Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, 09/06/1999 12:18, John Denker
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/06/1999 13:19, Daniel Schroeder
Re: energy, work, heat, 09/06/1999 13:36, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
How do I change my address?, 09/06/1999 13:39, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 13:52, brian whatcott
Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, 09/06/1999 14:14, John Denker
YP Waves (plug), 09/06/1999 14:14, Yves Pelletier
Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, 09/06/1999 15:21, John Denker
Re: weight of a hovering/diving fly in a box, 09/06/1999 15:32, John Mallinckrodt
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/06/1999 15:45, Timothy Folkerts
bird in a cage/flight, 09/07/1999 08:17, Greg Puskar
Re: phone scam, 09/07/1999 09:10, David J. Hamilton
Project Starshine, 09/07/1999 12:36, Tom Ford
Re: Project Starshine, 09/07/1999 12:57, Leigh Palmer
Re: Project Starshine, 09/07/1999 13:55, Michael Edmiston
energy, momentum, qualitative reasoning, 09/07/1999 14:15, John Denker
Re: Judgement on opposing airfoil views, pt. 1, 09/07/1999 20:25, William Beaty
Re: bird in a cage/flight, 09/07/1999 20:26, brian whatcott
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/07/1999 20:46, Peter Schoch
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/07/1999 22:01, Ludwik Kowalski
[no subject], 09/08/1999 02:12, Alvin V. Flores
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/08/1999 03:27, Mark Sylvester
Re: Heat & Energy, 09/08/1999 07:51, brian whatcott
[no subject], 09/08/1999 07:54, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 08:17, John Denker
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 09:24, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 10:47, David Bowman
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 11:03, William Beaty
Re: heat Phlogiston, 09/08/1999 11:15, Timothy Folkerts
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 11:18, Leigh Palmer
On http://www.monmouth.com/~jsd/fly/vortex/, 09/08/1999 11:38, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 11:49, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 14:56, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 15:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 15:10, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 15:27, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Project Starshine, 09/08/1999 17:04, Tom Ford
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 17:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 20:38, Chuck Britton
Re: Project Starshine, 09/08/1999 21:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 21:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 22:44, Jim Green
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 22:47, Chuck Britton
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 23:15, Jim Green
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/08/1999 23:38, Bob Sciamanda
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 01:15, Jim Green
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 02:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 02:39, Daniel L. MacIsaac
heat versus deja vu, 09/09/1999 02:54, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 03:35, John Denker
Re: "heat" is NOT a form of "energy", 09/09/1999 06:48, Jim Green
Re: "heat" is NOT a form of "energy", 09/09/1999 06:57, Jim Green
Re: heat versus deja vu, 09/09/1999 06:59, Herbert H Gottlieb
Large neodymiums on eBay, 09/09/1999 09:05, William Beaty
denker vs. beaty: a subtle(?) point, 09/09/1999 09:32, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 09:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 11:28, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, 09/09/1999 11:38, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 12:04, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 12:18, William Beaty
Removing Bill B's scientific credibility entirely, 09/09/1999 12:40, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 13:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 13:49, David Bowman
Re: Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, 09/09/1999 13:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 14:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 14:56, Leigh Palmer
Rockets and Ground Reaction - Revisited, 09/09/1999 16:20, brian whatcott
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 16:27, Robert Carlson
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 17:09, Timothy Folkerts
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/09/1999 17:48, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 19:26, Daniel Schroeder
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 20:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 20:32, David Bowman
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 20:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: weight of a bird in a cage, 09/09/1999 21:00, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Heat energy, analogies, lecture demos, 09/09/1999 21:15, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 21:43, Daniel Schroeder
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 23:20, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/09/1999 23:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/10/1999 00:12, Bob Sciamanda
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/10/1999 10:20, Michael Edmiston
Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 15:04, Thomas Walkiewicz
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 15:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 15:43, Thomas Walkiewicz
Re: Electrostatics problem -Reply, 09/10/1999 16:02, Hasan Fakhruddin
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 16:31, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 16:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 17:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 17:15, Michael Edmiston
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 17:23, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatics problem - PS, 09/10/1999 17:27, Michael Edmiston
Q vs "heat", 09/10/1999 17:51, Jim Green
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 18:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 18:28, Bob Sciamanda
Wave Question, 09/10/1999 20:12, romanza
interference question, 09/10/1999 20:43, Michael Moloney
Re: Wave Question, 09/10/1999 20:59, Leigh Palmer
AAPT abstract deadline, links to last summers' meeting, 09/10/1999 21:04, Michael Moloney
Re: Brian Green Featured on ABC Nightline in Prime Time, 09/10/1999 21:06, Teresa Hein
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 22:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 23:13, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/10/1999 23:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/11/1999 01:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Wave Question, 09/11/1999 04:23, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: subscribing to the list, 09/11/1999 08:39, JoAnn Manor
solution to the world's energy needs, 09/11/1999 08:44, David Bowman
Re: conservation of energy not substance, 09/11/1999 09:20, John Denker
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/11/1999 10:02, Cliff Parker
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/11/1999 11:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/11/1999 11:22, John Mallinckrodt
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/11/1999 11:53, brian whatcott
"Pure Energy", 09/11/1999 17:08, Jim Green
[no subject], 09/11/1999 19:52, fred brace
[no subject], 09/11/1999 19:58, Cliff Parker
Re: Wave Question, 09/11/1999 20:42, romanza
interference question, 09/11/1999 20:48, romanza
Airplane Drag, 09/11/1999 21:33, Jim Green
[no subject], 09/11/1999 21:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Wave Question, 09/11/1999 22:16, Leigh Palmer
Re: interference question, 09/11/1999 22:18, John Denker
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/11/1999 22:34, John Denker
Light Mill?, 09/11/1999 22:41, Chuck Britton
Re: Wave Question, 09/11/1999 22:58, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Wave Question, 09/12/1999 00:55, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 06:44, Robert A Cohen
Re: interference question, 09/12/1999 07:10, John Denker
[no subject], 09/12/1999 07:34, Robert W. Harris
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/12/1999 08:36, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 09:36, brian whatcott
[no subject], 09/12/1999 11:20, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 12:22, William Beaty
[no subject], 09/12/1999 12:23, Glenn Knapp
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 13:08, Leigh Palmer
[no subject], 09/12/1999 13:19, Leigh Palmer
Heat and Energy, 09/12/1999 13:42, Carl C. Gaither
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/12/1999 13:58, William Beaty
Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 14:10, brian whatcott
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 14:19, William Beaty
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/12/1999 14:25, brian whatcott
Re: interference question, 09/12/1999 14:40, Michael Moloney
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 14:59, Bob Sciamanda
Do photons exist?, 09/12/1999 15:25, William Beaty
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/12/1999 15:26, Chuck Britton
Re: your mail, 09/12/1999 15:30, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 15:32, Leigh Palmer
Lissajous figure demo, 09/12/1999 15:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 15:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/12/1999 15:51, William Beaty
Cliff Parker's question (was: heat is a form of energy), 09/12/1999 16:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Heat and Energy, 09/12/1999 16:08, Jim Green
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/12/1999 16:31, Jim Green
Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/12/1999 17:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: your mail, 09/12/1999 17:17, Cliff Parker
The flat Earth, 09/12/1999 17:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/12/1999 17:27, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Cliff Parker's question (was: heat is a form of energy), 09/12/1999 17:40, Cliff Parker
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/12/1999 17:47, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/12/1999 17:53, John Mallinckrodt
The speed of sound, 09/12/1999 18:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: Cliff Parker's question, 09/12/1999 18:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Lissajous figure demo, 09/12/1999 19:27, Ed Schweber
Re: Cliff Parker's question, 09/12/1999 19:31, Cliff Parker
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 19:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Heat and Energy, 09/12/1999 19:55, Chuck Britton
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/12/1999 20:45, Leigh Palmer
The flat Earth, 09/12/1999 20:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: The Flat Earth, 09/12/1999 22:58, Jim Green
Re: The flat Earth, 09/12/1999 23:00, Hugh Haskell
Re: Airplane drag, 09/12/1999 23:00, John Denker
Re: forces on the winds, 09/12/1999 23:37, John Denker
Re: The flat Earth, 09/13/1999 00:38, Jim Green
Re: The flat Earth, 09/13/1999 00:43, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Airplane drag, 09/13/1999 01:25, Jim Green
Re: Airplane drag, 09/13/1999 01:53, John Denker
Re: Cliff Parker's question, 09/13/1999 01:55, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Cliff Parker's question, 09/13/1999 02:08, Cliff Parker
Re: Light Mill?, 09/13/1999 02:44, Mojca Cepic
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/13/1999 04:04, Jim Green
URL correction - IP Lissajous simulation, 09/13/1999 05:13, Ed Schweber
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/13/1999 05:31, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
internal energy, 09/13/1999 06:57, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/13/1999 07:33, Peter Schoch
Subject, 09/13/1999 08:10, Jerry Hester
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/13/1999 09:04, John Denker
Re: A ball in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), 09/13/1999 09:08, Robert A Cohen
Electrostatics problem thanks, 09/13/1999 09:40, Thomas Walkiewicz
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/13/1999 10:00, William Beaty
making sound waves visible, 09/13/1999 10:04, William Beaty
Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, 09/13/1999 10:18, John D. Wiseman SET PHYS-L MAIL DIG NOREP NOACE NOMIME HELP
Re: Light Mill?, 09/13/1999 10:22, Joseph Bellina
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/13/1999 11:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: The flat Earth, 09/13/1999 11:48, Gary Karshner
Humorous Article, 09/13/1999 12:53, Doug Craigen
Re: making sound waves visible, 09/13/1999 13:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/13/1999 13:16, brian whatcott
Re: Light Mill?, 09/13/1999 13:24, Herbert H Gottlieb
FW: Logal.net Back to School--and to Hurricanes, 09/13/1999 13:41, Cindy Schwarz
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/13/1999 14:10, Jim Green
Re: Humorous Article, 09/13/1999 14:20, Jim Green
Re: Electrostatics problem, 09/13/1999 14:45, Michael Edmiston
Re: Electrostatics problem & citation, 09/13/1999 15:52, Peter Schoch
Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, 09/13/1999 16:00, William Beaty
Time Conservation, 09/13/1999 16:03, paul o johnson
Re: making sound waves visible, 09/13/1999 16:12, William Beaty
Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, 09/13/1999 16:39, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
MS Windows Virus-like Security Gaps, 09/13/1999 16:43, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Time Conservation, 09/13/1999 17:09, Peter Mccardell
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/13/1999 17:22, crawford j maccallum
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/13/1999 17:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Humorous Article, 09/13/1999 18:03, Doug Craigen
Re: Electrostatics problem & citation, 09/13/1999 18:32, Bob Sciamanda
Stability analysis for L4/L5, 09/13/1999 20:24, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Subject, 09/13/1999 21:28, Karl Trappe
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/13/1999 21:30, John Mallinckrodt
Re: FW: Logal.net Back to School--and to Hurricanes, 09/13/1999 22:13, Catherine Hafner
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/13/1999 22:26, William Beaty
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/13/1999 22:41, Hugh Haskell
Re: Clockwise Rotation of Fire Gases, 09/13/1999 22:41, Hugh Haskell
The Wrights was (solution ...world's energy...)[long], 09/13/1999 23:01, brian whatcott
Re: making sound waves visible, 09/13/1999 23:48, Leigh Palmer
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/14/1999 00:13, brian whatcott
Re: heat is a form of energy, & Re: Time conservation, 09/14/1999 00:22, Leigh Palmer
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 03:55, Mojca Cepic
Re: making sound waves visible, 09/14/1999 07:30, William Beaty
Localizable energy, 09/14/1999 07:52, William Beaty
Re: Wave Question, 09/14/1999 09:41, William Beaty
Re: Airplane Drag, 09/14/1999 09:46, William Beaty
Re: heat is a form of energy, 09/14/1999 10:11, William Beaty
Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 10:20, Michael Edmiston
Re: The flat Earth, 09/14/1999 10:34, William Beaty
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 10:42, William Beaty
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 10:48, Spagna Jr., George
Re: stopwatches and laser pointers, 09/14/1999 11:04, William Beaty
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 12:35, Doug Craigen
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 12:47, John Gastineau
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 12:59, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 13:02, Daniel Schroeder
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 13:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 13:12, Chuck Britton
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 13:16, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 13:17, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 13:35, William Beaty
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 13:54, Jim Green
"Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 13:59, William Beaty
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 14:02, Leigh Palmer
List of Lists, 09/14/1999 14:03, Jim Green
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 14:17, John S. Denker
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 14:17, Jim Green
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 14:27, Jim Green
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 14:50, John S. Denker
Re: Light Mill?, 09/14/1999 14:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 14:57, John Gastineau
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 15:15, Doug Craigen
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 15:19, Chuck Britton
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 16:45, Hugh Haskell
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 18:04, Joel Rauber
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 18:13, William Beaty
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 18:29, William Beaty
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/14/1999 18:34, Leigh Palmer
Correction! Re: $6 laser pointers (fwd), 09/14/1999 19:30, William Beaty
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 19:46, Chuck Britton
Re: Correction! Re: $6 laser pointers (fwd), 09/14/1999 20:38, Richard Grandy
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 23:25, Greg Clements
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/14/1999 23:37, Hugh Haskell
Re: List of Lists, 09/14/1999 23:42, Hugh Haskell
Interesting articles, 09/14/1999 23:58, Hugh Haskell
Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 05:54, Ed Schweber
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 07:43, John Denker
Re: List of Lists, 09/15/1999 08:22, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 08:27, brian whatcott
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 10:13, Richard Tarara
Re: Letters of Rec. - Followup, 09/15/1999 10:13, Michael Edmiston
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/15/1999 10:44, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/15/1999 10:49, Joel Rauber
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 11:12, Chuck Britton
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 11:16, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 11:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 12:03, Joseph Bellina
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 12:27, Chuck Britton
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 12:42, Hugh Haskell
Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, 09/15/1999 12:47, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: Drafting in Bicycles versus Boats, 09/15/1999 13:16, John Denker
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/15/1999 13:54, crawford j maccallum
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/15/1999 13:59, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, 09/15/1999 14:38, John Denker
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 14:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Tips on How to Write Them, 09/15/1999 15:21, Joel Rauber
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/15/1999 15:38, Douglass Goodale
Physics Infomall CD, 09/15/1999 16:58, Laurent Hodges
Re: teachers=magicians ?, 09/15/1999 19:06, Robert W. Harris
Re: teachers=magicians ?, 09/15/1999 22:45, brian whatcott
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/16/1999 07:49, William Beaty
i,j,k, 09/16/1999 08:00, Barlow Newbolt
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/16/1999 09:01, William Beaty
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/16/1999 09:22, Joseph Bellina
Re: List of Lists, 09/16/1999 09:36, William Beaty
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/16/1999 09:50, David Bowman
Off-Topic:Non-Science Works of Priestley, 09/16/1999 09:55, brian whatcott
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/16/1999 10:43, William Beaty
Re: Bennett and his Volvo, 09/16/1999 11:09, Barlow Newbolt
Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 11:20, Laurent Hodges
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 12:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 12:16, Gary Karshner
Re: i,j,k, 09/16/1999 12:20, brian whatcott
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 12:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 12:26, Michael Edmiston
Re: i,j,k, units, vectors, etc., 09/16/1999 12:28, John Denker
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 12:36, brian whatcott
Optics Labs with Video Capture, 09/16/1999 12:39, Ivan E. Rouse
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/16/1999 13:15, Richard Tarara
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 13:16, Hanna Rudnicki
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 13:30, Leigh Palmer
Brian Green Featured on ABC Nightline in Prime Time, 09/16/1999 13:36, Warren Hein
axes not required, 09/16/1999 13:42, John Denker
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 13:43, Richard Tarara
String theory TV program tonight, 09/16/1999 13:45, Roger Freedman
Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, 09/16/1999 13:57, Peter Mccardell
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 14:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 14:31, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 14:40, Richard Tarara
things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 14:47, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 15:23, Clarence Bennett
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 15:25, Nils Sorensen
Re: i,j,k things, 09/16/1999 15:29, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 15:47, Joel Rauber
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 16:13, Daniel Schroeder
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 16:22, Michael Edmiston
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 16:32, Leigh Palmer
Re: Bennett and his Volvo, 09/16/1999 16:35, Clarence Bennett
Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, 09/16/1999 16:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, 09/16/1999 17:00, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 17:22, Ted E. Dumm
Re: Optics Labs with Video Capture, 09/16/1999 17:41, Don Stenton
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 20:58, Norman Lohstreter
Re: i,j,k things., 09/16/1999 21:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 21:26, William Beaty
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 21:30, William Beaty
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 23:28, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/16/1999 23:34, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/16/1999 23:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 00:56, Peter Vajk
teachers=magicians ?, 09/17/1999 06:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: teachers=magicians ?, 09/17/1999 08:03, Lois Breur Krause
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/17/1999 08:22, Taylor Stafford
Re: letters of recommendation, 09/17/1999 08:28, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/17/1999 08:50, Lois Breur Krause
Re: i,j,k things., 09/17/1999 09:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 09:45, Richard Tarara
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 10:01, Lois Breur Krause
low-tech diffraction pattern, 09/17/1999 10:09, Michael Moloney
Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, 09/17/1999 10:15, Michael Edmiston
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 10:42, William Beaty
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 11:08, Chuck Britton
Global Warming, 09/17/1999 11:24, Chuck Britton
Re: "Horganism"???? Perfect!!, 09/17/1999 11:26, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 11:35, William Beaty
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/17/1999 11:39, David Bowman
Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, 09/17/1999 11:46, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 11:57, Rondo Jeffery
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 11:58, Richard Tarara
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 12:09, Joel Rauber
laser light, 09/17/1999 12:34, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/17/1999 12:36, John S. Denker
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/17/1999 13:16, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 13:33, Chuck Britton
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/17/1999 13:45, Clarence Bennett
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/17/1999 14:08, Clarence Bennett
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/17/1999 14:10, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: low-tech diffraction pattern, 09/17/1999 14:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Bicycles, trucks, trains, 09/17/1999 14:52, crawford j maccallum
Re: i,j,k -- OK, I get it, 09/17/1999 14:56, Joel Rauber
Re: i,j,k -- & please sign your postings, 09/17/1999 15:21, Joel Rauber
Re: laser light, 09/17/1999 15:34, William Beaty
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/17/1999 15:56, Jim Green
Re: low-tech diffraction pattern, 09/17/1999 16:11, Dayton Labs
dbar, 09/17/1999 16:18, Jim Green
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 22:11, Cliff Parker
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 22:37, Chuck Britton
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 22:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: things to do with dry ice?, 09/17/1999 22:52, Norman Lohstreter
i,j,k things., 09/17/1999 23:36, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/18/1999 00:15, brian whatcott
Re: i,j,k things., 09/18/1999 02:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Letters of Recommendation - Problems, 09/18/1999 11:33, Keith Tipton
Re: dbar, 09/18/1999 14:37, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/18/1999 14:39, paul o johnson
Met Images, 09/18/1999 19:00, brian whatcott
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/18/1999 19:17, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/18/1999 22:22, William Beaty
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/18/1999 22:55, William Beaty
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/18/1999 23:17, Chuck Britton
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 03:39, William Beaty
Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, 09/19/1999 04:01, William Beaty
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 04:32, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, 09/19/1999 09:51, Leigh Palmer
Scanning problems, 09/19/1999 10:16, Leigh Palmer
NASA High-Risk Projects. [was Cold Fusion ...], 09/19/1999 10:18, brian whatcott
Re: Scanning problems, 09/19/1999 10:37, brian whatcott
Re: Scanning problems, 09/19/1999 10:50, Chuck Britton
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 10:55, Rick Tarara
Re: Scanning problems, 09/19/1999 11:07, Rick Tarara
Re: Scanning problems, 09/19/1999 12:48, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 13:34, William Beaty
Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, 09/19/1999 13:49, William Beaty
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 15:38, Stefan Jeglinski
Another new PC "virus": Count2K, 09/19/1999 16:24, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/19/1999 16:31, Roger Freedman
Re: NASA High-Malarkey Project, 09/19/1999 18:43, John Denker
Re: Possible acoustic phenomenon, very bizarre, 09/19/1999 20:26, Joseph Bellina
Re: NASA High-Malarkey Project, 09/19/1999 21:44, paul o johnson
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/20/1999 01:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 06:06, Barlow Newbolt
cold fusion, 09/20/1999 07:23, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/20/1999 08:13, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 08:20, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 10:24, Leigh Palmer
Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 10:41, Spagna Jr., George
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 10:42, Doug Craigen
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 11:34, John Mallinckrodt
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 11:43, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 12:08, Doug Craigen
Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 12:23, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 12:50, Peter Schoch
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 12:56, Chuck Britton
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 12:57, Peter Schoch
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 13:59, Rondo Jeffery
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 14:12, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 14:23, Leigh Palmer
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 14:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 14:47, Leigh Palmer
fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/20/1999 15:13, William Beaty
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 15:52, Rondo Jeffery
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/20/1999 17:02, Hugh Haskell
Making Hay, 09/20/1999 18:35, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Kibbles & Bits, 09/20/1999 18:40, brian whatcott
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 19:41, Jim Green
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 19:52, Jim Green
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 22:17, Doug Craigen
Re: Scanning problems, 09/20/1999 22:22, Doug Craigen
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/20/1999 22:29, William Beaty
Re: cold fusion, 09/20/1999 23:14, brian whatcott
Re: Cold Fusion Discussion, 09/20/1999 23:16, William Beaty
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/20/1999 23:47, brian whatcott
Re: i,j,k things., 09/21/1999 02:53, John Denker
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/21/1999 07:54, brian whatcott
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/21/1999 08:58, William Beaty
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/21/1999 09:07, Lois Breur Krause
Re: solution to the world's energy needs, 09/21/1999 10:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/21/1999 11:46, William Beaty
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/21/1999 13:08, Gary Karshner
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/21/1999 13:29, Richard Grandy
Conspiracy! Conspiracy!, 09/21/1999 13:31, William Beaty
Arthur C. Clarke as skeptic, 09/21/1999 15:27, Chuck Britton
Re: i,j,k things., 09/21/1999 15:57, Ken Caviness
Re: i,j,k things., 09/21/1999 17:39, Timothy Folkerts
Re: Arthur C. Clarke as skeptic, 09/21/1999 18:00, William Beaty
enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, 09/21/1999 18:09, William Beaty
Re: Cold fusion, 09/21/1999 18:13, Rondo Jeffery
Re: i,j,k things., 09/21/1999 20:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), 09/21/1999 21:57, John Mallinckrodt
Re: i,j,k things., 09/21/1999 22:19, Robert Carlson
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/21/1999 22:54, John Mallinckrodt
Re: cold fusion, 09/22/1999 00:27, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Cold fusion, 09/22/1999 00:55, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, 09/22/1999 06:42, William Beaty
The Onion, 09/22/1999 06:58, William Beaty
Re: dimensionless i,j,k things., 09/22/1999 08:04, John Denker
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/22/1999 08:26, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), 09/22/1999 08:49, Joel Rauber
Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), 09/22/1999 09:22, Michael Edmiston
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/22/1999 10:20, Michael Edmiston
Re: Being careful with dimensions, 09/22/1999 10:26, brian whatcott
Re: i,j,k things., 09/22/1999 10:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: i,j,k things, 09/22/1999 10:34, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: i,j,k things., 09/22/1999 10:51, Ludwik Kowalski
A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 10:53, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Being careful with dimensions (was Re: i,j,k things), 09/22/1999 10:58, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Being careful with dimensions, 09/22/1999 11:01, John Mallinckrodt
Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 11:03, Chuck Britton
Re: Being careful with dimensions, 09/22/1999 11:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 11:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 11:51, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/22/1999 11:52, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 12:28, Leigh Palmer
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 13:01, Van E. Neie
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 13:17, Rondo Jeffery
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 13:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 13:39, Leigh Palmer
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 14:03, Chuck Britton
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 14:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 14:19, Goddess Maia
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 14:44, Rondo Jeffery
supplements to theory of reletivity, 09/22/1999 15:01, Daniel Lozkov
Re: i,j,k things, 09/22/1999 15:08, Joel Rauber
Re: i,j,k things., 09/22/1999 15:20, Joel Rauber
Re: i,j,k things, 09/22/1999 15:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 16:14, David Bowman
Re: i,j,k things, 09/22/1999 16:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 17:44, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/22/1999 18:06, Hugh Haskell
Re: i,j,k things, 09/22/1999 18:29, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 19:37, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A stinking explanation ?, 09/22/1999 20:33, John Mallinckrodt
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/22/1999 21:10, VERNON DEWEES
Re: Whitcomb area rule (was: Drafting in bicycle races), 09/22/1999 21:31, John Denker
physical pendulums, 09/22/1999 22:30, fred brace
Re: physical pendulums, 09/22/1999 23:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: physical pendulums, 09/22/1999 23:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races, 09/22/1999 23:50, brian whatcott
Re: physical pendulums, 09/22/1999 23:55, Leigh Palmer
Re: physical pendulums, 09/23/1999 01:29, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: i,j,k things, 09/23/1999 03:50, Darwin Z. Palima
Re: physical pendulums, 09/23/1999 06:47, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 07:35, jmanor
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 07:59, Spagna Jr., George
mars and venus, 09/23/1999 08:01, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 08:01, Spagna Jr., George
i,j,k things, Math & Physics, 09/23/1999 08:17, Chuck Britton
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 08:27, Chuck Britton
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 08:35, Chuck Britton
old msg Re: Evolution and Creationism, 09/23/1999 08:47, William Beaty
Re: Being careful with directions, 09/23/1999 08:51, James Watson
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 09:26, jmanor
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 09:42, Michael Edmiston
Re: physical pendulums, 09/23/1999 10:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 10:46, Uri Ganiel
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 10:50, David Bowman
Re: physical pendulums, 09/23/1999 11:15, Herbert H Gottlieb
physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 11:21, Ken Fox
Re: enough already with the CF/Wrights stuff?, 09/23/1999 11:40, paul o johnson
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 11:45, Richard Tarara
Nostalgia (Re: Drafting in Bicycle Races), 09/23/1999 12:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 12:45, Stan Greenspoon
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 12:51, Stephen Murray
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 13:01, John Mallinckrodt
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 13:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 13:16, Chuck Britton
Re: i,j,k -- OK, how do the students get it?, 09/23/1999 13:18, Taylor Stafford
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 13:21, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 13:31, Leigh Palmer
Re: old msg Re: Evolution and Creationism, 09/23/1999 14:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: PHYS-L Digest - 22 Sep 1999 - Special issue, 09/23/1999 14:38, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 14:44, Joel Rauber
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 14:46, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 14:46, Richard Tarara
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 15:12, Michael Edmiston
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 15:53, Joseph Bellina
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 15:56, Michael Edmiston
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 16:37, Leigh Palmer
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 16:57, David Bowman
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 17:12, John Mallinckrodt
AP Calc/AP Phys question, 09/23/1999 17:19, Fran Poodry
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 17:53, Stephen Murray
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 18:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/23/1999 18:19, Abul Kalam
"first form an hypothesis...", 09/23/1999 18:38, crawford j maccallum
Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 18:42, Cliff Parker
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 19:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: AP Calc/AP Phys question, 09/23/1999 19:55, David Simmons
Re: mars and venus, 09/23/1999 19:56, Mishra, Prasanna K., Ph.D. (Prasanna Mishra)
Help, 09/23/1999 20:04, Timothy Sullivan
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 20:08, Rick Tarara
Evolution and Creationism, 09/23/1999 20:29, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/23/1999 20:45, David J. Hamilton
Re: AP Calc/AP Phys question, 09/23/1999 21:20, Jerome Epstein
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/23/1999 21:24, Chuck Britton
Re: Help, 09/23/1999 21:40, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 21:42, Cliff Parker
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/23/1999 23:10, David Bowman
Re: Help, 09/23/1999 23:53, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/24/1999 00:32, Peter Vajk
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 03:17, Leigh Palmer
Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 05:20, Jim Green
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 05:59, Karl Trappe
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 07:39, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 07:55, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 08:01, Lois Breur Krause
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/24/1999 08:03, R. kirk Bailey
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 08:11, Chuck Britton
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 08:29, William Beaty
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 08:38, Robert A Cohen
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 08:40, William Beaty
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 09:20, Clarence Bennett
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 09:21, Clarence Bennett
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/24/1999 09:22, William Beaty
R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 09:40, Paolo Cavallo
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 09:51, Joseph Bellina
Re: Being careful with dimensions, 09/24/1999 10:10, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 10:33, Lois Breur Krause
Re: fuel-air explosives and the next highschool "event", 09/24/1999 10:42, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 10:44, Richard Tarara
Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 10:57, Joel Rauber
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 11:05, Michael Edmiston
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 11:18, Karl Trappe
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 11:21, Bob Muir
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 11:24, Hugh Haskell
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 11:34, Chuck Britton
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 11:55, Michael Edmiston
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 12:01, Joseph Bellina
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 12:02, Lois Breur Krause
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 12:06, Michael Edmiston
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 12:21, Robert A Cohen
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 12:28, Sam Sampere
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/24/1999 12:44, Marc Kossover
Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 12:44, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 12:46, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 13:00, Rondo Jeffery
Re: physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 13:07, Ken Fox
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 13:18, Rick Strickert
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 13:30, Joseph Bellina
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 13:34, brian whatcott
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 13:40, Joel Rauber
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 14:01, Hugh Logan
Longitudinal E-waves ?, 09/24/1999 14:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 15:02, Joel Rauber
Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 15:07, Joel Rauber
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 15:10, Leigh Palmer
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 15:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 16:03, Jim Green
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 16:17, Robert Carlson
College nowadays: was Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 16:57, Joel Rauber
Re: R: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/24/1999 17:05, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: mars and venus, 09/24/1999 17:07, Michael Edmiston
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 17:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Signature block, 09/24/1999 17:21, paul o johnson
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 17:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Diffraction, 09/24/1999 17:26, Gerry White
Re: mars and venus, 09/24/1999 17:30, Stephen Murray
Re: Another signature block, 09/24/1999 17:43, paul o johnson
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 18:23, Gerry White
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/24/1999 19:25, Cliff Parker
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 19:38, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 19:47, Jim Green
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 19:55, Robert Carlson
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 20:04, Robert Carlson
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 20:06, Hugh Logan
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 20:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 20:16, Cliff Parker
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 20:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 20:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 21:12, brian whatcott
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 21:31, David Kardelis
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 21:35, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 21:39, brian whatcott
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 21:45, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Scientific Method, 09/24/1999 22:27, William Beaty
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 22:28, Cliff Parker
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 22:30, brian whatcott
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 22:31, Cliff Parker
Re: Signature block, 09/24/1999 22:34, William Beaty
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 22:41, brian whatcott
Re: Dull Razors, 09/24/1999 22:53, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Diffraction, 09/24/1999 23:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Diffraction, 09/25/1999 00:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: Diffraction, 09/25/1999 00:48, Leigh Palmer
"Levitron" maglev device, 09/25/1999 01:44, William Beaty
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/25/1999 01:53, felina
WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 02:44, Leon Leonardo
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 05:50, Ed Schweber
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 08:32, Jim Green
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/25/1999 09:20, William Beaty
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 09:22, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 09:43, Peter Schoch
Re: Signature block, 09/25/1999 10:01, Chuck Britton
Re: Diffraction, 09/25/1999 10:29, Cliff Parker
Re: Diffraction, 09/25/1999 11:02, brian whatcott
Re: "first form an hypothesis...", 09/25/1999 11:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, 09/25/1999 13:32, John Denker
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/25/1999 13:50, John Denker
Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, 09/25/1999 14:27, Chuck Britton
Re: approximate Huyghens' construcion, 09/25/1999 14:34, Cliff Parker
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 14:42, Glenn A. Carlson
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/25/1999 14:42, Cliff Parker
Re: Signature block, 09/25/1999 16:08, Karl Trappe
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 17:12, Timothy S. Sullivan
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 17:56, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 18:19, Jerome Epstein
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 18:39, Jerome Epstein
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 19:28, Peter Schoch
Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, 09/25/1999 20:08, Michael Moloney
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 20:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, 09/25/1999 20:28, Ed Schweber
Re: reality vs. science fair vs. hypothesis testing, 09/25/1999 20:29, John Denker
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/25/1999 20:33, Leigh Palmer
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 22:23, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/25/1999 23:15, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Dull Razors, 09/25/1999 23:51, Charley Myles
Re: Questions on Neg. and Pos. Acceleration, 09/25/1999 23:57, Peter Vajk
Excerpt from What's New for Sep 24, 1999 (fwd), 09/26/1999 00:00, Charley Myles
Re: Dull Razors, 09/26/1999 06:40, John Cooper
Re: Sold on MathType. What about a drawing package?, 09/26/1999 07:42, Peter Schoch
Re: WORD Equation editor help needed, 09/26/1999 07:46, Peter Schoch
Re: Autosketch and Mathtype, 09/26/1999 09:21, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/26/1999 11:14, B.Surendranath Reddy
Sustainability revisited - in memento mori, 09/26/1999 11:54, brian whatcott
Other Office resources, 09/26/1999 12:11, Rick Tarara
Re: Sustainability revisited - in memento mori, 09/26/1999 12:13, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: Signature block, 09/26/1999 12:42, paul o johnson
Re: Signature block, 09/26/1999 13:21, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Dull Razors, 09/26/1999 13:49, Joseph Bellina
Re: Another signature block, 09/26/1999 15:08, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Doing math versus editing it., 09/26/1999 17:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/26/1999 18:09, Cliff Parker
Netscape Communicator, 09/26/1999 18:18, Cliff Parker
Re: Doing math versus editing it., 09/26/1999 18:44, Robert Carlson
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/26/1999 18:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: Netscape Communicator, 09/26/1999 18:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: Doing math versus editing it., 09/26/1999 19:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: Doing math versus editing it., 09/26/1999 20:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Doing math versus editing it., 09/26/1999 20:55, Robert Carlson
MSWord Editing Question, 09/26/1999 21:05, Mervin Koehlinger
Re: Signature block, 09/26/1999 21:33, Chuck Britton
Re: MSWord Editing Question, 09/26/1999 22:04, Rick Tarara
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/26/1999 22:25, Cliff Parker
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/26/1999 22:51, David Bowman
Re: Longitudinal E-waves ?, 09/27/1999 02:42, Mojca Cepic
Re: Appropriate technology; was: Scanning problems, 09/27/1999 04:29, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: Doing math versus editing it., 09/27/1999 04:37, Margaret Mazzolini
test -- ignore, 09/27/1999 06:45, David Bowman
Re: laser light [2], 09/27/1999 08:21, William Beaty
Re: polarization of reflected/refracted waves, 09/27/1999 08:33, John Denker
Re: Dull Razors, 09/27/1999 08:38, Lois Breur Krause
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 09:18, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/27/1999 09:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Levitron" maglev device, 09/27/1999 10:13, William Beaty
Re: Rainbow applet, 09/27/1999 10:24, Leigh Palmer
Simulations., 09/27/1999 11:14, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Dull Razors, 09/27/1999 11:30, paul o johnson
Block Scheduling!?, 09/27/1999 13:19, Chuck Britton
Re: Block Scheduling!?, 09/27/1999 14:38, Pat Keeney
Re: mars and venus, 09/27/1999 15:06, Michael Edmiston
Re: mars and venus, 09/27/1999 16:01, Stephen Murray
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 16:06, Allen Miller
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 16:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: mars and venus, 09/27/1999 17:07, William Beaty
Re: Longitudinal E-waves ?, 09/27/1999 17:10, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 17:14, Dale Orth
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 17:23, Richard Tarara
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/27/1999 18:19, Stephen Murray
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 18:55, Cliff Parker
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/27/1999 19:02, William Beaty
Re: Block Scheduling!?, 09/27/1999 21:07, Norman Lohstreter
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/27/1999 22:04, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Diffraction, 09/27/1999 22:10, crawford j maccallum
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 05:15, Ed Schweber
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 08:41, Lois Breur Krause
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 09:14, Joseph Bellina
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 09:32, William Beaty
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 10:18, Michael Edmiston
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/28/1999 10:52, Richard Tarara
OHIO section/AAPT meeting Oct 16, 09/28/1999 11:03, Charlie Reno
Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 01:01, Jim Green
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 01:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 05:49, Jim Green
Re: Quantum Leaps, 09/29/1999 06:41, Barlow Newbolt
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 06:50, John Cooper
AAPT people in the Northwest?, 09/29/1999 07:10, William Beaty
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 07:13, John Denker
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 07:35, William Beaty
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 08:17, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 08:45, Lois Breur Krause
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 09:51, Michael Edmiston
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 10:06, Richard Tarara
Re: Dull Razors, 09/29/1999 10:11, Michael Edmiston
Balls in a Funnel, 09/29/1999 10:17, brian whatcott
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 10:22, brian whatcott
Re: max energy (was: Quantum Leap), 09/29/1999 10:39, John Denker
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 10:54, Timothy Folkerts
Re: max energy (was: Quantum Leap), 09/29/1999 11:50, John Denker
Re: Quantum Leap, 09/29/1999 11:58, Michael Edmiston
fluorescent tubes, 09/29/1999 13:22, Carl E. Mungan
Re: fluorescent tubes, 09/29/1999 14:17, Chuck Britton
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/29/1999 14:27, Stephen Murray
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/29/1999 15:25, Carl E. Mungan
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/29/1999 15:37, William Beaty
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/29/1999 16:56, Fran Poodry
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/29/1999 17:07, Stephen Murray
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/29/1999 20:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/29/1999 22:22, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: max energy (long...), 09/29/1999 22:28, brian whatcott
Re: max energy (long...), 09/29/1999 22:56, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Block Scheduling!?, 09/29/1999 23:10, Samuel Held
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 06:39, Ed Schweber
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 08:55, Bob Muir
Scientists Criticize Textbooks (fwd), 09/30/1999 09:01, William Beaty
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 09:10, Joel Rauber
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 09:17, Joseph Bellina
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 09:22, Joseph Bellina
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 09:27, Richard Tarara
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 09:45, Richard Tarara
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 10:26, Maurice Barnhill
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 10:35, Doug Craigen
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 11:00, Hugh Haskell
Calculators and "Cheating", 09/30/1999 11:37, Doug Craigen
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 11:47, Joel Rauber
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 12:07, Doug Craigen
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 12:49, Richard Tarara
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 09/30/1999 13:41, Hugh Haskell
Re: The "basic three" (was: Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity), 09/30/1999 14:53, Doug Craigen
The "basic three" (was: Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity), 09/30/1999 15:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 09/30/1999 15:10, Glenn A. Carlson
Colored Chalk for the Black Board, 09/30/1999 15:18, Tony Wayne
Re: Scientific method was physical pendulums/ an opportunity, 09/30/1999 15:43, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 09/30/1999 16:19, Timothy Folkerts
Re: College nowadays - What "should" students know?, 09/30/1999 16:53, Hugh Logan
Re: Calculators and "Cheating", 09/30/1999 21:09, Mary and Bill Allsopp
Re: mars and venus (long), 09/30/1999 21:39, David Bowman
Re: Block Scheduling!?, 09/30/1999 22:12, Norman Lohstreter
Re: Balls in a Funnel, 10/02/1999 00:04, brian whatcott

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Mail converted by MHonArc