Phys-L List Archive (by Thread) of November, 1999

Search Archives

• Re: Why do we care about heat?, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, John Denker
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, John Denker
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, brian whatcott
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Jim Green
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Jim Green
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Why do we care about heat?, Jim Green
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, Margaret Mazzolini
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, Shapiro, Mark
  • Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, Julie Hilsenteger
• reversible heat and irreversible weight-lifting, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: reversible heat and irreversible weight-lifting, John Mallinckrodt
• Help, Jason Sooter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: Help, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: Help, Anne Pfannkoch
  • Re: Help, Richard Tarara
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, Joel Rauber
• Re: irreversible lifting, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: irreversible lifting, Richard Tarara
  • Re: irreversible lifting, Jim Green
  • Re: irreversible lifting, Richard Tarara
  • Re: irreversible lifting, John Denker
  • Re: irreversible lifting, brian whatcott
• Re: mini Y2K?, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: mini Y2K?, Hugh Haskell
• Re: dW turns into dQ, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Jim Green
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Jim Green
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • Re: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
• W-->E-->Q-->U, at my level of teaching, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: W-->E-->Q-->U, at my level of teaching, John Denker
• melting butter in a microwave, Carl E. Mungan
• Comments Re: Where are the girls?, Jim Green
• How to subscribe to this list?, Hasan Fakhruddin
• melting butter in a microwave - addendum, Carl E. Mungan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: melting butter in a microwave - addendum, Paul O. Johnson
• PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Waggoner, Bill
  • Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, David Bowman
  • Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Richard Grandy
  • Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, brian whatcott
• Physics--Honing the Intellect, Mike Ugawa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Jim Green
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Jim Green
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, Joel Rauber
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Bob Yeend
  • Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Richard Tarara
  • Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Waggoner, Bill
• DW/DW Summary, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DW/DW Summary, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: DW/DW Summary, Joel Rauber
  • Re: DW/DW Summary, Jim Green
• Re: L51-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Jim Green
• post from a "lurking" woman, Cindy Schwarz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: post from a "lurking" woman, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Forces on Free Falling Objects, jmanor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Forces on Free Falling Objects, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: Forces on Free Falling Objects, brian whatcott
• Re: L1-Forces on Free Falling Objects, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: calendar change, Michael Edmiston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: calendar change, Chuck Britton
  • Re: calendar change, Richard Tarara
  • Re: calendar change, Leigh Palmer
• HS Tchr Physics Tchg workshop opportunity, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Jim Green
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Larry Cartwright
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Bob Sciamanda
• models and reification (was: dW turns into dQ, Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: models and reification (was: dW turns into dQ, Bob Sciamanda
• partitioning dU & the first law (short), Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: partitioning dU & the first law (short), Brian McInnes
• Giving the Denker his due?, Bob Sciamanda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Giving the Denker his due?, Jim Green
  • Re: Giving the Denker his due?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Giving the Denker his due?, Jim Green
• <off list>, Leigh Palmer
• Re: single-system dQ + dW, John S. Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: single-system dQ + dW, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: single-system dQ + dW, John S. Denker
• L0-Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L0-Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, Ludwik Kowalski
• mag. force on wire?, Leon Leonardo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Chuck Britton
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Joel Rauber
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Chuck Britton
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Stan Greenspoon
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, William Beaty
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, William Beaty
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: mag. force on wire?, Joel Rauber
• testing vs. teaching, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: testing vs. teaching, Chuck Britton
  • Re: testing vs. teaching, Richard Tarara
  • Re: testing vs. teaching, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: testing vs. teaching, Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: testing vs. teaching, Shapiro, Mark
• R: Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, Paolo Cavallo
• A twist on the hourglass problem, Peter Schoch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, Hasan Fakhruddin
  • Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, brian whatcott
  • Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, brian whatcott
• Re: reification, Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: reification, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: reification, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: reification, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: reification, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: reification, Joel Rauber
  • Reification, Jim Green
• L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Chuck Britton
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Mark Sylvester
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., John Denker
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Lynn Aldrich
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Richard Tarara
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Chuck Britton
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., John P Lewis
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Mark Sylvester
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Rick Tarara
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Hugh Haskell
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Richard Grandy
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., brian whatcott
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., brian whatcott
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Arlyn DeBruyckere
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Chuck Britton
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Chuck Britton
  • Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Hugh Haskell
• L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, Peter Schoch
  • Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, Peter Schoch
• A High kcal Question, David Marx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A High kcal Question, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A High kcal Question, brian whatcott
  • Re: A High kcal Question, Van E. Neie
• Re: L0 A High kcal Question, Ludwik Kowalski
• Holes, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Holes, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Holes, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
  • Re: Holes, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Holes, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Holes, Chuck Britton
• Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, David Bowman
  • Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, Chuck Britton
• Re: Jacob Bekenstein, Peter Vajk
• Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), Bob Sciamanda
• transistors, Barlow Newbolt
• Re: Holes, Positrons, Vern Lindberg
• More High Cuisine (was A High kcal Q), brian whatcott
• Transistorized, Warren Hein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Transistorized, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Transistorized, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Transistorized, Shapiro, Mark
  • Re: Transistorized, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Transistorized, Richard Bowman
  • Re: Transistorized, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Transistorized, Jim Goff
  • Re: Transistorized, brian whatcott
  • Re: Transistorized, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Transistorized, Dr. Paul O. Johnson
  • Re: Transistorized, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Transistorized, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: Transistorized, William Beaty
  • Re: Transistorized, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Transistorized, William Beaty
  • Re: Transistorized, Herbert H Gottlieb
• IP 5.0, Paolo Cavallo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IP 5.0, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: mystery photomultiplier, Stan Dodds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: mystery photomultiplier, James McLean
• who do you think you're?, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• f, m and a, Barlow Newbolt
• Re: Irish Mail, Clarence Bennett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Irish Mail, Chuck Britton
• Re: Centripetal Force--was part of L2-"Negotiating" a curve., Richard Tarara
• F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: F=ma, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: F=ma, James S. Marsh
  • Re: F=ma, John Denker
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Gary Karshner
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Jim Green
  • Re: F=ma, Jim Green
  • Re: F=ma, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: F=ma, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: F=ma, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: F=ma, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: F=ma, Richard Tarara
  • Re: F=ma, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: F=ma, John Denker
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Robert Carlson
  • Re: F=ma, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
  • Re: F=ma, Jim Green
  • Re: F=ma, Larry Cartwright
  • Re: F=ma, Joel Rauber
  • Re: F=ma, Joel Rauber
  • Re: F=ma, Shapiro, Mark
  • Re: F=ma, Joel Rauber
  • Re: F=ma, Van Neie
  • Re: F=ma, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: F=ma, brian whatcott
  • Re: F=ma, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: F=ma, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: F=ma, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Centripetal Force vs centrifugal field, John Denker
• R: Re: IP 5.0, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: L2 - Ohm's law (was F=ma)., Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: soap as a teaching aid :-), John Denker
• Presentation of equations (was F=ma), Robert A Cohen
• Re: delta V = I R, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: delta V = I R, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: delta V = I R, Richard Tarara
  • Re: delta V = I R, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: delta V = I R, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: delta V = I R, Paul O. Johnson
  • Re: delta V = I R, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: delta V = I R, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: delta V = I R, Paul O. Johnson
  • Re: delta V = I R, Paul O. Johnson
  • Re: delta V = I R, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: delta V = I R, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: PHYS-L Digest - 4 Nov 1999 - Special issue, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, John Denker
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, John Denker
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
  • Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, Glenn A. Carlson
• [no subject], Leigh Palmer
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, John Denker
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, John Denker
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, John Denker
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, John Denker
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, brian whatcott
• Re: WHAT IS UNDERSTANDING?, Ludwik Kowalski
• da/dt = jerk?, Robert A Cohen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, brian whatcott
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Doug Craigen
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Mary and Bill Allsopp
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, brian whatcott
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, William Beaty
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Mary and Bill Allsopp
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Guentcho Skordev
  • Re: da/dt = jerk?, Hugh Haskell
• Predicting Time Series (was PHYS-L Nov99 Tech...), brian whatcott
• Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, Leigh Palmer
• Invitation, Shapiro, Mark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Invitation, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Invitation, Shapiro, Mark
• RLL controller, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: F=ma, Who said ...?, Larry Cartwright
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, Bob Sciamanda
• expurgated version: "Negotiating" a curve, John Denker
• Ohm's Law, Van E. Neie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Van E. Neie
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Ohm's Law, David Bowman
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Rondo Jeffery
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Ohm's Law, John Denker
  • Re: Ohm's Law, brian whatcott
  • Re: Ohm's Law, David Smith
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Shapiro, Mark
• Elastic collision rule, Lemmerhirt, Fred
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Elastic collision rule, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Elastic collision rule, Chuck Britton
• tensile strength of space-time, Larry Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tensile strength of space-time, brian whatcott
• email conventions (was Re: melting butter in a microwave - addendum), Carl E. Mungan
• Utility of dynamic resistance, Shapiro, Mark
• tangential riddle (was: expurgated version: "Negotiating" a curve), Carl E. Mungan
• Phys-L posts per day, Rondo Jeffery
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Phys-L posts per day, Ludwik Kowalski
• video encyclopedia, James S. Marsh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: video encyclopedia, Roger Freedman
• An ohmic experiment, Michael Edmiston
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An ohmic experiment, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: An ohmic experiment, Paul O. Johnson
  • Re: An ohmic experiment, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: An ohmic experiment, Gary Karshner
• List your site!, David Smith
• Re: tangential riddle, John Denker
• diode I,V curve, John Denker
• BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., John Denker
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., brian whatcott
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., John Denker
  • Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., Ludwik Kowalski
• Physics Olympics, Karl Trappe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physics Olympics, B.Surendranath Reddy
• position available, Spagna Jr., George
• AAPT Update 1999 Number 11 (fwd), Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Videodisks, Ludwik Kowalski
• lightbulbs, Yvon Jean
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lightbulbs, John Denker
  • Re: lightbulbs, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: lightbulbs, crawford j maccallum
  • Re: lightbulbs, brian whatcott
  • Re: lightbulbs, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: lightbulbs, Hugh Haskell
• Physics Today Articles, Bob Sciamanda
• Sponsor a Kenyan college science student, Jane Jackson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sponsor a Kenyan college science student, William J. Larson
• Re: F=ma (fwd), Miguel A. Santos
• PIRA 200 Demo Website, Grand Opening! (fwd), Daniel L. MacIsaac
• driving with a jerk, William Beaty
• Faculty position starting August 2000 (fwd), Daniel L. MacIsaac
• test-delete, Miguel A. Santos
• [no subject], Dale Ulrich
• Oklahoma School Book Selections, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, brian whatcott
  • Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, brian whatcott
• lightbulbs and coffee cans, Barlow Newbolt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: lightbulbs and coffee cans, brian whatcott
• Constraint and inertia, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Paul Middents
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Robert Carlson
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Constraint and inertia, Miguel A. Santos
• Bubble-Boy fix, Bob Sciamanda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bubble-Boy fix, Larry Cartwright
• Fwd: Super, Van E. Neie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Super, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Super, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Fwd: Super, Zach Wolff
  • Re: Fwd: Super, brian whatcott
  • Re: Fwd: Super, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Fwd: Super, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Super, William Beaty
  • Re: Super, brian whatcott
  • Re: Super, William Beaty
• ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., Miguel A. Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., brian whatcott
  • Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., Miguel A. Santos
• Resonance Demo, Mike Ugawa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Tom Ford
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Sam Sampere
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Sam Sampere
  • Re: Resonance Demo, David Kardelis
  • Re: Resonance Demo, Leigh Palmer
• Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., Peter Vajk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., Peter Vajk
• Kinds of Mass, Peter Vajk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Kinds of Mass, Kirkpatrick, James
• Virtual Photons and Inverse Square Laws, Ed Schweber
• Super Problem, Van E. Neie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Super Problem, Bob Muir
  • Re: Super Problem, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Super Problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Super Problem, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Super Problem, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Super Problem, Guentcho Skordev
• Re: Fwd: Super Problem solved (sort of), Van E. Neie
• Inertia or the "amount of substance", Miguel A. Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Kirkpatrick, James
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", Miguel A. Santos
• The essence of how to educate our students, Jane Jackson
• Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Brian Rintoul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Allen Miller
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, David Strasburger-fac
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, William Beaty
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, brian whatcott
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, romanza
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, William Beaty
  • Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, John Mallinckrodt
• car windshields, fred brace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: car windshields, Gary Karshner
  • Re: car windshields, Zach Wolff
  • Re: car windshields, Doug Craigen
  • Re: car windshields, Peter Schoch
  • Re: car windshields, fred brace
• R: This is a multi-part message in MIME format., Paolo Cavallo
• turning over of thousands digit, Barlow Newbolt
• State of Academe (long), Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: State of Academe (long), Shapiro, Mark
• 20th century, James Espinosa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 20th century, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: 20th century, Mark Sylvester
  • Re: 20th century, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: 20th century, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: 20th century, Sampere
  • Re: 20th century, David E. Clark
  • Re: 20th century, Chuck Britton
  • Re: 20th century, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: 20th century, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: 20th century, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: 20th century, Chuck Britton
  • Re: 20th century, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: 20th century, Raymond A. Rogoway
  • Re: 20th century, Chuck Britton
  • Re: 20th century, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: 20th century, Doug Craigen
  • Re: 20th century, Sam Sampere
  • Re: 20th century, brian whatcott
  • Re: 20th century, Peter Schoch
• 3D thermodynamic diagram for a fluid, Sylvain HEILLIETTE (by way of Chuck Britton)
• Maple Logistic was Charge Distribution, brian whatcott
• Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, Roger Freedman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, John Cooper
  • Re: Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, Doug Craigen
• Re: measurement using ruler -- was 20th century, Peter Schoch
• Problem with a problem, Harry L. Hightower
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Science Lab1
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Van E. Neie
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Lemmerhirt, Fred
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Problem with a problem, Science Lab1
• tanning beds, fred brace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tanning beds, N. Pete Lohstreter
  • Re: tanning beds, John Cooper
  • Re: tanning beds, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: tanning beds, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: tanning beds, Kirkpatrick, James
  • Re: tanning beds, brian whatcott
• Tomorrow's Professor, Larry Cartwright
• off topic (physics) on topic (education), Joel Rauber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: off topic (physics) on topic (education), Shapiro, Mark
• Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Richard Tarara
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, brian whatcott
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, brian whatcott
  • Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, Ludwik Kowalski
• Chinese laser pointer, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Chinese laser pointer, Herbert H Gottlieb
• new textbook, Ludwik Kowalski
• coke can tapping, Leon Leonardo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: coke can tapping, Doug Craigen
  • Re: coke can tapping, David Simmons
  • Re: coke can tapping, brian whatcott
  • Re: coke can tapping, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: coke can tapping, brian whatcott
• New Virus: "Prilissa", Larry Cartwright
• Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M tragedy., Shapiro, Mark
• Re: Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M tragedy., Richard Grandy
• Re: Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M traged y., Shapiro, Mark
• NOAH's FLOOD/ancient coastline found, Jane Jackson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NOAH'S FLOOD/ancient coastline found, Jane Jackson
• current/water analogy, William J. Larson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: current/water analogy, William J. Larson
• R: current/water analogy, Paolo Cavallo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: R: current/water analogy, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Joe Taylor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Richard Tarara
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, Ludwik Kowalski
• library holdings, David Kardelis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: library holdings, Peter Schoch
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., brian whatcott
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., brian whatcott
  • Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., Ludwik Kowalski
• Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, Bob Yeend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, Zach Wolff
• Smoke rings, Kirkpatrick, James
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Smoke rings, John Denker
• Electrical and Magnetic interactions: Cahabay and Sherwood, Brian McInnes
• Rolling Motion, Robert Carlson
• New radiation survival champ, Larry Cartwright
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New radiation survival champ, brian whatcott
  • Re: New radiation survival champ, John Denker
• Thermodynamics of springs, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thermodynamics of springs, John Denker
  • Re: Thermodynamics of springs, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, John Denker
  • Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, brian whatcott
  • Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, brian whatcott
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Pedagogy, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, John Denker
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, brian whatcott
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Jim Green
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, John Denker
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, John Denker
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, John Denker
  • Re: Thermo/Sidebar, Jim Green
• Less is More (but this is long!), Ed Eckel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Less is More (but this is long!), brian whatcott
  • Re: Less is More (but this is long!), Jerome Epstein
• COLLISION, David Abineri
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: COLLISION, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: COLLISION, John Denker
  • Re: COLLISION, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: COLLISION, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: COLLISION, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: COLLISION, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION, Shawn Knudsen
• Re: Definition of heat, John Denker
• Lightbulb Physics, Larry Cartwright
• Not ready for it. LONG, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Not ready for it. LONG, Margaret Mazzolini
• Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, John Denker
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, brian whatcott
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, John Denker
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, James S. Marsh
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, Kate Wilcox
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], John Denker
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], brian whatcott
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], John Denker
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], Jim Green
  • Re: Definition of heat [and S], Ludwik Kowalski
• Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, Robert Carlson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, brian whatcott
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, Robert Carlson
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, brian whatcott
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, Robert Carlson
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, Robert A Cohen
• COLLISION 2, David Abineri
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: COLLISION 2, John Denker
  • Re: COLLISION 2, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Chuck Britton
  • Re: COLLISION 2, John Denker
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: COLLISION 2, John Denker
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Brian McInnes
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION 2, John Denker
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Michael N. Monce
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Chuck Britton
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Joel Rauber
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Brian McInnes
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Brian McInnes
  • Re: COLLISION 2, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, brian whatcott
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Jim Green
  • Re: COLLISION 2, Michael N. Monce
  • Re: COLLISION 2, John Denker
• Re: Not ready for it. (shorter), Joel Rauber
• Re: COLLISION 2: real-world data, John Denker
• Re: Rotating Stick -- reduction to quadratures, John Denker
• Joule etc, Jim Green
• Re: verbiage, John Denker
• Electronic registration with advising holds?, Ray Enzweiler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, Joel Rauber
  • Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, Bob Muir
  • Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, Shapiro, Mark
  • Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, Zach Wolff
  • Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, David E. Clark
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar (signatures please), Joel Rauber
• The Physics InfoMall for the Mac, Richard Hake
• Re: (signatures please), Jim Green
• [Fwd: neural timing and schizophrenia], Raymond A. Rogoway
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Fwd: neural timing and schizophrenia], brian whatcott
• Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Ed Schweber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Samuel Held
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Ed Schweber
  • Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, Daniel Schroeder
• Elliptical functions or integrals, David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Elliptical functions or integrals, Lerner Desks
• Re: teaching "higher" math functions, John Denker
• Video Equipment, Mark Carrington
• Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, Lerner Desks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, William J. Larson
  • Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, Lerner Desks
• Photons was COLLISION 2, Jim Green
• "Big Bang" Party, Shapiro, Mark