Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 01:17 PM 01-11-99 -0500, you wrote:matters
This might be compared to asking, in F=mA, "if F includes the sum of
electrical, gravitational, etc forces and only their (vector) sum
thefor calculating A, why the partitioning?" Of course it is because this
partitioning is our way of enabling the calculation of that sum, but
(taxonomyresulting A wouldn't care if you used a different partitioning
changesof F) so long as you applied the same vector sum.
Yes, Bob, but not quite. As far as dE goes mox nix. BUT dQ also
the entropy! So it is requisite to at least consider some sort ofactions.
partition between dQ and dW -- surely so in the cases of reversible
Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen