Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of November, 1999

Search Archives

• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 02:41, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 05:58, Margaret Mazzolini
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 06:50, John Denker
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 07:12, John Denker
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 07:53, brian whatcott
• reversible heat and irreversible weight-lifting, 11/01/1999 08:04, John Denker
• Help, 11/01/1999 08:35, Jason Sooter
• Re: reversible heat and irreversible weight-lifting, 11/01/1999 09:01, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Help, 11/01/1999 09:57, Maurice Barnhill
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 11/01/1999 10:16, Joel Rauber
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 10:27, John Denker
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 10:30, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mini Y2K?, 11/01/1999 10:33, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 11/01/1999 10:34, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 11/01/1999 10:38, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mini Y2K?, 11/01/1999 10:57, Hugh Haskell
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 11:02, John Denker
• Re: Help, 11/01/1999 11:10, Hugh Haskell
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 11/01/1999 11:14, John Mallinckrodt
• W-->E-->Q-->U, at my level of teaching, 11/01/1999 11:58, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 12:26, Jim Green
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 12:27, Richard Tarara
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 12:30, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: macroscopic vs microscopic degrees of freedom, 11/01/1999 12:31, Joel Rauber
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 12:43, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 12:50, Joel Rauber
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 12:53, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 12:55, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 13:17, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 13:43, Joel Rauber
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 13:45, Joel Rauber
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 13:51, Chuck Britton
• Re: Help, 11/01/1999 14:53, Anne Pfannkoch
• Re: Help, 11/01/1999 14:57, Richard Tarara
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 15:17, Bob Sciamanda
• melting butter in a microwave, 11/01/1999 15:19, Carl E. Mungan
• Re: W-->E-->Q-->U, at my level of teaching, 11/01/1999 15:27, John Denker
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 15:34, Jim Green
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 15:42, Richard Tarara
• Comments Re: Where are the girls?, 11/01/1999 16:09, Jim Green
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 16:17, Jim Green
• How to subscribe to this list?, 11/01/1999 16:32, Hasan Fakhruddin
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 16:36, Jim Green
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 16:40, Jim Green
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 17:04, Bob Sciamanda
• melting butter in a microwave - addendum, 11/01/1999 17:10, Carl E. Mungan
• Re: Where are the girls? - long posting, 11/01/1999 17:19, Julie Hilsenteger
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 17:26, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 17:42, Joel Rauber
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 17:55, Joel Rauber
• PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 17:57, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 18:12, John Denker
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/01/1999 18:24, Bob Sciamanda
• Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/01/1999 19:45, Mike Ugawa
• Re: irreversible lifting, 11/01/1999 19:57, brian whatcott
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/01/1999 20:16, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 20:32, Waggoner, Bill
• Re: Why do we care about heat?, 11/01/1999 20:46, Jim Green
• Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 21:27, Jerome Epstein
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 21:32, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 21:44, Ludwik Kowalski
• DW/DW Summary, 11/01/1999 21:55, Jim Green
• Re: L51-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/01/1999 22:06, Jim Green
• Re: DW/DW Summary, 11/01/1999 22:09, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/02/1999 00:45, Bob Yeend
• post from a "lurking" woman, 11/02/1999 08:05, Cindy Schwarz
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/02/1999 09:07, Richard Tarara
• Forces on Free Falling Objects, 11/02/1999 09:29, jmanor
• Re: DW/DW Summary, 11/02/1999 09:42, Joel Rauber
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 10:22, Joel Rauber
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 11:14, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 11:46, Jim Green
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 11:56, Joel Rauber
• Re: DW/DW Summary, 11/02/1999 12:02, Jim Green
• Re: L1-Forces on Free Falling Objects, 11/02/1999 12:36, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 12:48, Jim Green
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/02/1999 13:12, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Forces on Free Falling Objects, 11/02/1999 13:31, Maurice Barnhill
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 13:56, Clarence Bennett
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 14:07, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Physics--Honing the Intellect, 11/02/1999 14:12, Joel Rauber
• Re: calendar change, 11/02/1999 14:29, Michael Edmiston
• HS Tchr Physics Tchg workshop opportunity, 11/02/1999 14:34, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 14:41, Joel Rauber
• Re: calendar change, 11/02/1999 14:45, Chuck Britton
• Re: calendar change, 11/02/1999 14:57, Richard Tarara
• Re: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 15:17, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: calendar change, 11/02/1999 15:29, Leigh Palmer
• Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 15:50, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 17:04, Jim Green
• models and reification (was: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 18:22, Joel Rauber
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 18:33, Leigh Palmer
• partitioning dU & the first law (short), 11/02/1999 18:48, Joel Rauber
• Giving the Denker his due?, 11/02/1999 19:03, Bob Sciamanda
• <off list>, 11/02/1999 19:13, Leigh Palmer
• Re: models and reification (was: dW turns into dQ, 11/02/1999 19:26, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: single-system dQ + dW, 11/02/1999 20:03, John S. Denker
• Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/02/1999 20:10, Waggoner, Bill
• Re: Forces on Free Falling Objects, 11/02/1999 20:46, brian whatcott
• L0-Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 21:26, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Giving the Denker his due?, 11/02/1999 21:34, Jim Green
• Re: L0-Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 21:34, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Giving the Denker his due?, 11/02/1999 21:50, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/02/1999 23:24, Larry Cartwright
• mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 00:33, Leon Leonardo
• Re: Giving the Denker his due?, 11/03/1999 00:36, Jim Green
• testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 01:04, John Denker
• R: Re: L5-PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/03/1999 01:56, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: partitioning dU & the first law (short), 11/03/1999 04:42, Brian McInnes
• A twist on the hourglass problem, 11/03/1999 06:19, Peter Schoch
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/03/1999 07:14, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, 11/03/1999 08:13, Hasan Fakhruddin
• Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, 11/03/1999 08:20, brian whatcott
• Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, 11/03/1999 09:35, Leigh Palmer
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 10:01, Chuck Britton
• Re: testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 10:06, Chuck Britton
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 10:10, Joel Rauber
• Re: testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 10:16, Richard Tarara
• Re: testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 10:28, Michael Edmiston
• Re: single-system dQ + dW, 11/03/1999 10:35, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 10:37, Leigh Palmer
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 10:44, Chuck Britton
• Re: reification, 11/03/1999 10:50, Joel Rauber
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 10:58, Bob Sciamanda
• L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 11:00, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 11:20, Chuck Britton
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 11:28, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
• Re: reification, 11/03/1999 11:41, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 12:16, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/03/1999 12:18, Gary Karshner
• Re: Weight, Mass & Force - Educational Testing Service Responds, 11/03/1999 12:27, Bob Sciamanda
• L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, 11/03/1999 12:39, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 12:45, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 12:51, Stan Greenspoon
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 13:11, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 13:36, Maurice Barnhill
• Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, 11/03/1999 13:37, Peter Schoch
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 14:28, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, 11/03/1999 14:30, Robert A Cohen
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 14:49, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: reification, 11/03/1999 14:58, Leigh Palmer
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 15:11, Mark Sylvester
• Re: single-system dQ + dW, 11/03/1999 15:20, John S. Denker
• Re: A twist on the hourglass problem, 11/03/1999 15:21, brian whatcott
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 15:23, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 15:53, William Beaty
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 15:56, William Beaty
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 15:59, Maurice Barnhill
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 16:16, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: mag. force on wire?, 11/03/1999 16:33, Joel Rauber
• Re: testing vs. teaching, 11/03/1999 16:57, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: reification, 11/03/1999 16:57, Michael Edmiston
• Re: L5-To lecture or not to lecture?, 11/03/1999 17:06, Peter Schoch
• Re: reification, 11/03/1999 19:46, Leigh Palmer
• A High kcal Question, 11/03/1999 21:19, David Marx
• Re: L0 A High kcal Question, 11/03/1999 21:39, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: A High kcal Question, 11/03/1999 22:31, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 22:38, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 22:48, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:14, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:30, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:31, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:40, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:44, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:48, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:50, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/03/1999 23:59, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 00:02, Ludwik Kowalski
• Holes, 11/04/1999 00:02, Jim Green
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 00:04, Bob Sciamanda
• Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, 11/04/1999 00:06, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: Jacob Bekenstein, 11/04/1999 03:00, Peter Vajk
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 06:35, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 07:01, John Denker
• Re: A High kcal Question, 11/04/1999 08:10, brian whatcott
• Re: Holes, 11/04/1999 08:25, Chuck Britton
• Re: A High kcal Question, 11/04/1999 08:42, Van E. Neie
• Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, 11/04/1999 09:30, David Bowman
• Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), 11/04/1999 09:53, Joel Rauber
• transistors, 11/04/1999 10:06, Barlow Newbolt
• Re: reification, 11/04/1999 10:14, Joel Rauber
• Re: Holes, 11/04/1999 10:16, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
• Re: Holes, Positrons, 11/04/1999 10:31, Vern Lindberg
• Re: Holes, 11/04/1999 10:40, Doug Craigen
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 11:01, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), 11/04/1999 11:05, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Ideal Wheels: was( L2-"Negotiating" a curve.), 11/04/1999 11:08, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 11:35, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, 11/04/1999 11:47, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Vitural particle cloud as preferred reference?, 11/04/1999 12:30, Chuck Britton
• More High Cuisine (was A High kcal Q), 11/04/1999 12:49, brian whatcott
• Transistorized, 11/04/1999 13:30, Warren Hein
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 13:46, Chuck Britton
• Reification, 11/04/1999 13:47, Jim Green
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 13:50, Leigh Palmer
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 13:54, Lynn Aldrich
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 13:57, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/04/1999 13:59, David Bowman
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 14:17, Richard Tarara
• Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/04/1999 14:21, Richard Grandy
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 14:28, Rondo Jeffery
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 14:38, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 14:44, Richard Bowman
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 14:44, Chuck Britton
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 14:51, Chuck Britton
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 15:22, John Mallinckrodt
• IP 5.0, 11/04/1999 15:34, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 15:44, John P Lewis
• Re: IP 5.0, 11/04/1999 16:04, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 16:12, Jim Goff
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 16:22, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 16:33, Mark Sylvester
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 16:41, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 17:20, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 17:32, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 17:43, Rick Tarara
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 17:43, Leigh Palmer
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 17:49, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 18:02, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 18:05, Hugh Haskell
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 18:09, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 18:26, Leigh Palmer
• Re: mystery photomultiplier, 11/04/1999 21:01, Stan Dodds
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 21:38, Richard Grandy
• Re: Transistorized, 11/04/1999 21:41, brian whatcott
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 22:21, brian whatcott
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 22:30, brian whatcott
• Re: PHYS-L Nov99 Technical posting, 11/04/1999 22:32, brian whatcott
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 22:48, Bob Sciamanda
• who do you think you're?, 11/04/1999 23:29, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/04/1999 23:37, Leigh Palmer
• f, m and a, 11/05/1999 06:13, Barlow Newbolt
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/05/1999 07:42, Arlyn DeBruyckere
• Re: Transistorized, 11/05/1999 08:19, Chuck Britton
• Re: Irish Mail, 11/05/1999 08:28, Clarence Bennett
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/05/1999 08:44, Chuck Britton
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/05/1999 08:46, Chuck Britton
• Re: Centripetal Force--was part of L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/05/1999 09:17, Richard Tarara
• F=ma, 11/05/1999 10:02, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Centripetal Force vs centrifugal field, 11/05/1999 10:29, John Denker
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 10:29, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 10:41, James S. Marsh
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 10:46, John Denker
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 10:59, Leigh Palmer
• R: Re: IP 5.0, 11/05/1999 11:20, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: Irish Mail, 11/05/1999 11:48, Chuck Britton
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 12:03, Gary Karshner
• Re: L2-"Negotiating" a curve., 11/05/1999 12:08, Hugh Haskell
• Re: L2 - Ohm's law (was F=ma)., 11/05/1999 12:29, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: soap as a teaching aid :-), 11/05/1999 12:32, John Denker
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 12:53, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 13:14, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 15:04, Jim Green
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 15:33, Jim Green
• Presentation of equations (was F=ma), 11/05/1999 16:03, Robert A Cohen
• Re: Transistorized, 11/05/1999 16:06, Dr. Paul O. Johnson
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 16:13, Clarence Bennett
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 16:17, Clarence Bennett
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 16:17, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 16:26, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 16:39, Richard Tarara
• Re: Transistorized, 11/05/1999 16:50, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 17:01, Rondo Jeffery
• Re: Holes, 11/05/1999 17:49, Stefan Jeglinski
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/05/1999 17:50, John Denker
• Re: F=ma, 11/05/1999 18:02, John Denker
• Re: PHYS-L Digest - 4 Nov 1999 - Special issue, 11/05/1999 18:03, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/05/1999 18:47, John Denker
• [no subject], 11/05/1999 19:16, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Transistorized, 11/05/1999 22:03, Jerome Epstein
• Re: F=ma, 11/06/1999 02:32, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/06/1999 07:21, Robert Carlson
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 10:02, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Holes, 11/06/1999 10:35, Chuck Britton
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 11:09, John Denker
• Re: WHAT IS UNDERSTANDING?, 11/06/1999 12:01, Ludwik Kowalski
• da/dt = jerk?, 11/06/1999 12:41, Robert A Cohen
• Re: F=ma, 11/06/1999 12:45, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
• Predicting Time Series (was PHYS-L Nov99 Tech...), 11/06/1999 13:15, brian whatcott
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/06/1999 13:43, brian whatcott
• Re: F=ma, 11/06/1999 13:55, Jim Green
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/06/1999 14:01, Doug Craigen
• Re: F=ma, 11/06/1999 14:51, Larry Cartwright
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/06/1999 15:18, Leigh Palmer
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 16:03, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 16:35, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 16:43, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/06/1999 16:48, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/06/1999 19:46, Glenn A. Carlson
• virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/06/1999 19:53, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, 11/06/1999 21:36, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, 11/06/1999 23:44, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/07/1999 02:38, Mary and Bill Allsopp
• Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, 11/07/1999 03:45, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/07/1999 04:47, John Denker
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 05:04, John Denker
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 05:53, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/07/1999 10:29, brian whatcott
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 12:03, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 13:03, Joel Rauber
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 13:08, Joel Rauber
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 13:22, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/07/1999 13:22, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 13:26, Joel Rauber
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/07/1999 13:27, William Beaty
• Invitation, 11/07/1999 13:29, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: SV: Mathematically complex physics, 11/07/1999 13:39, Leigh Palmer
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/07/1999 13:53, Leigh Palmer
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 13:57, John Denker
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 15:37, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 16:31, Van Neie
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 17:02, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: melting butter in a microwave - addendum, 11/07/1999 18:12, Paul O. Johnson
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/07/1999 19:08, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• RLL controller, 11/07/1999 19:14, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: F=ma, Who said ...?, 11/07/1999 19:42, Larry Cartwright
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/07/1999 19:42, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/07/1999 20:11, brian whatcott
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 21:03, John Denker
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, 11/07/1999 22:25, Ludwik Kowalski
• expurgated version: "Negotiating" a curve, 11/07/1999 23:24, John Denker
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. EUREKA?, 11/07/1999 23:37, brian whatcott
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 01:42, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/08/1999 06:37, Mary and Bill Allsopp
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 09:08, Michael Edmiston
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, 11/08/1999 09:20, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 09:23, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 09:23, Richard Tarara
• Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 09:34, Van E. Neie
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 09:41, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: "Negotiating" a curve. NOT SIMPLE, 11/08/1999 09:47, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 10:16, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 10:17, Van E. Neie
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 10:21, Bob Sciamanda
• Elastic collision rule, 11/08/1999 10:24, Lemmerhirt, Fred
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 10:24, David Bowman
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 10:32, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/08/1999 10:33, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Elastic collision rule, 11/08/1999 10:43, Doug Craigen
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 10:45, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 10:57, Doug Craigen
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 11:00, Michael Edmiston
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 11:07, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 11:08, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 11:24, Joseph Bellina
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 11:40, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 11:46, Paul O. Johnson
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 11:48, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 11:59, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 12:05, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• tensile strength of space-time, 11/08/1999 12:09, Larry Smith
• email conventions (was Re: melting butter in a microwave - addendum), 11/08/1999 12:18, Carl E. Mungan
• Utility of dynamic resistance, 11/08/1999 12:28, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 12:34, Rondo Jeffery
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 12:40, Bob Sciamanda
• tangential riddle (was: expurgated version: "Negotiating" a curve), 11/08/1999 12:41, Carl E. Mungan
• Re: F=ma, 11/08/1999 13:09, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 13:19, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 13:22, Rondo Jeffery
• Phys-L posts per day, 11/08/1999 13:44, Rondo Jeffery
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 14:29, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 14:58, Paul O. Johnson
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 15:03, Paul O. Johnson
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 15:24, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Elastic collision rule, 11/08/1999 16:09, Chuck Britton
• video encyclopedia, 11/08/1999 17:27, James S. Marsh
• Re: delta V = I R, 11/08/1999 17:30, Bob Sciamanda
• An ohmic experiment, 11/08/1999 17:35, Michael Edmiston
• Re: An ohmic experiment, 11/08/1999 17:51, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/08/1999 17:54, Robert A Cohen
• List your site!, 11/08/1999 18:22, David Smith
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/08/1999 19:05, Guentcho Skordev
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 19:08, Leigh Palmer
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 19:49, Leigh Palmer
• Re: mystery photomultiplier, 11/08/1999 19:57, James McLean
• Re: tangential riddle, 11/08/1999 20:36, John Denker
• Re: An ohmic experiment, 11/08/1999 20:41, Paul O. Johnson
• diode I,V curve, 11/08/1999 20:45, John Denker
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 20:58, John Denker
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 21:43, brian whatcott
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/08/1999 21:59, David Smith
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/08/1999 22:24, John Denker
• Re: Invitation, 11/09/1999 02:12, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Phys-L posts per day, 11/09/1999 08:53, Ludwik Kowalski
• BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 09:54, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: An ohmic experiment, 11/09/1999 10:06, Michael Edmiston
• Re: F=ma, 11/09/1999 10:15, Leigh Palmer
• Physics Olympics, 11/09/1999 10:37, Karl Trappe
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/09/1999 10:41, Gary Karshner
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/09/1999 10:50, Leigh Palmer
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 12:07, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/09/1999 12:16, Leigh Palmer
• Re: F=ma, 11/09/1999 12:24, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Ohm's Law, 11/09/1999 13:44, Shapiro, Mark
• position available, 11/09/1999 13:48, Spagna Jr., George
• Re: Invitation, 11/09/1999 13:48, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 15:02, John Denker
• Re: An ohmic experiment, 11/09/1999 15:25, Gary Karshner
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 15:37, Ludwik Kowalski
• AAPT Update 1999 Number 11 (fwd), 11/09/1999 15:37, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Videodisks, 11/09/1999 15:43, Ludwik Kowalski
• lightbulbs, 11/09/1999 17:34, Yvon Jean
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/09/1999 18:42, John Denker
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 18:54, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/09/1999 19:12, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 20:15, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/09/1999 20:24, crawford j maccallum
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/09/1999 20:58, brian whatcott
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 21:57, brian whatcott
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/09/1999 22:39, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: F=ma, 11/10/1999 04:45, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/10/1999 07:52, John Denker
• Physics Today Articles, 11/10/1999 09:35, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: F=ma, 11/10/1999 10:00, Leigh Palmer
• Re: video encyclopedia, 11/10/1999 11:21, Roger Freedman
• Re: Physics Olympics, 11/10/1999 11:23, B.Surendranath Reddy
• Sponsor a Kenyan college science student, 11/10/1999 11:42, Jane Jackson
• Re: Sponsor a Kenyan college science student, 11/10/1999 13:09, William J. Larson
• Re: F=ma, 11/10/1999 14:38, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: F=ma (fwd), 11/10/1999 14:52, Miguel A. Santos
• PIRA 200 Demo Website, Grand Opening! (fwd), 11/10/1999 16:11, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: da/dt = jerk?, 11/10/1999 16:18, Hugh Haskell
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/10/1999 16:26, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: lightbulbs, 11/10/1999 17:36, Hugh Haskell
• driving with a jerk, 11/10/1999 17:55, William Beaty
• Faculty position starting August 2000 (fwd), 11/10/1999 18:43, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Transistorized, 11/10/1999 19:57, William Beaty
• Re: BEFORE "Negotiating" a curve., 11/10/1999 21:36, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Transistorized, 11/10/1999 22:14, Chuck Britton
• test-delete, 11/11/1999 03:48, Miguel A. Santos
• [no subject], 11/11/1999 06:34, Dale Ulrich
• Oklahoma School Book Selections, 11/11/1999 07:42, brian whatcott
• lightbulbs and coffee cans, 11/11/1999 09:03, Barlow Newbolt
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/11/1999 09:49, Glenn A. Carlson
• Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 10:00, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, 11/11/1999 10:10, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 10:12, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, 11/11/1999 11:43, John Mallinckrodt
• Bubble-Boy fix, 11/11/1999 12:23, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 12:25, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 13:01, Joel Rauber
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 13:08, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 14:23, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 15:32, Miguel A. Santos
• Fwd: Super, 11/11/1999 15:47, Van E. Neie
• ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/11/1999 15:51, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 15:53, Ludwik Kowalski
• Resonance Demo, 11/11/1999 16:13, Mike Ugawa
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 16:39, Paul Middents
• Re: Transistorized, 11/11/1999 16:54, William Beaty
• Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/11/1999 17:20, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/11/1999 17:23, Tom Ford
• Re: virtual particles preferred frame?, 11/11/1999 17:35, Glenn A. Carlson
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/11/1999 17:36, Leigh Palmer
• Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/11/1999 17:41, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 18:04, Robert Carlson
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 18:05, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: lightbulbs and coffee cans, 11/11/1999 18:38, brian whatcott
• Re: Transistorized, 11/11/1999 18:41, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 18:48, Joel Rauber
• Re: Super, 11/11/1999 19:04, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/11/1999 19:12, brian whatcott
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/11/1999 19:23, Gary Karshner
• Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/11/1999 19:43, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, 11/11/1999 19:45, brian whatcott
• Re: Super, 11/11/1999 20:32, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Fwd: Super, 11/11/1999 21:11, Zach Wolff
• Re: Oklahoma School Book Selections, 11/11/1999 21:26, brian whatcott
• Re: Fwd: Super, 11/11/1999 21:29, brian whatcott
• Re: Fwd: Super, 11/11/1999 21:57, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Fwd: Super, 11/11/1999 22:52, Stefan Jeglinski
• Re: Super, 11/11/1999 23:23, William Beaty
• Re: Super, 11/11/1999 23:43, brian whatcott
• Re: Super, 11/12/1999 00:49, William Beaty
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/12/1999 01:24, Leigh Palmer
• Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., 11/12/1999 03:10, Peter Vajk
• Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 03:30, Peter Vajk
• Re: ERROR on LISTSERV (NDN: Re: Const..., 11/12/1999 05:25, Miguel A. Santos
• Virtual Photons and Inverse Square Laws, 11/12/1999 06:58, Ed Schweber
• Super Problem, 11/12/1999 08:46, Van E. Neie
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 08:50, Bob Muir
• Re: Fwd: Super Problem solved (sort of), 11/12/1999 08:50, Van E. Neie
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 09:00, Richard Tarara
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 09:34, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 09:47, Richard Tarara
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 10:39, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., 11/12/1999 10:53, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 12:21, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Constraint and inertia, 11/12/1999 14:37, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: post from a "lurking" woman, 11/12/1999 14:53, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 15:08, Richard Tarara
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 17:02, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Super Problem, 11/12/1999 17:56, Guentcho Skordev
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 18:03, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/12/1999 20:08, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Bubble-Boy fix, 11/13/1999 01:20, Larry Cartwright
• Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/13/1999 07:01, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/13/1999 11:37, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/13/1999 11:39, Kirkpatrick, James
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/13/1999 19:31, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/13/1999 20:23, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: Ohm's Law, Hooke's Law, etc., 11/13/1999 21:48, Peter Vajk
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/14/1999 10:16, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/14/1999 10:26, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Kinds of Mass, 11/14/1999 12:41, Kirkpatrick, James
• The essence of how to educate our students, 11/14/1999 15:01, Jane Jackson
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/14/1999 19:45, Ludwik Kowalski
• Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/14/1999 20:30, Brian Rintoul
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/14/1999 21:24, Bob Sciamanda
• car windshields, 11/14/1999 22:08, fred brace
• R: This is a multi-part message in MIME format., 11/15/1999 04:24, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 09:38, Allen Miller
• Re: car windshields, 11/15/1999 12:03, Gary Karshner
• Re: car windshields, 11/15/1999 12:20, Zach Wolff
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 17:00, David Strasburger-fac
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 17:07, William Beaty
• Re: car windshields, 11/15/1999 17:41, Doug Craigen
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 18:28, brian whatcott
• Re: car windshields, 11/15/1999 18:30, Peter Schoch
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 18:40, romanza
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/15/1999 21:20, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: car windshields, 11/15/1999 22:52, fred brace
• turning over of thousands digit, 11/16/1999 09:21, Barlow Newbolt
• State of Academe (long), 11/16/1999 09:23, Joel Rauber
• 20th century, 11/16/1999 12:09, James Espinosa
• Re: State of Academe (long), 11/16/1999 12:36, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 12:46, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 12:58, Mark Sylvester
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:29, Clarence Bennett
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:38, Michael Edmiston
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:49, Sampere
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:58, David E. Clark
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:58, Chuck Britton
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 13:59, Clarence Bennett
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 14:04, Leigh Palmer
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 14:17, Hugh Haskell
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 15:01, Chuck Britton
• 3D thermodynamic diagram for a fluid, 11/16/1999 15:13, Sylvain HEILLIETTE (by way of Chuck Britton)
• Re: 20th century, 11/16/1999 15:40, Hugh Haskell
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/16/1999 16:03, Sam Sampere
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 16:18, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/16/1999 17:11, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 17:20, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 17:26, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 17:51, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 18:11, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 18:50, Robert A Cohen
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 20:28, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 21:15, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 22:20, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 23:32, William Beaty
• Maple Logistic was Charge Distribution, 11/16/1999 23:43, brian whatcott
• Re: Charge Distribution around pointed areas, 11/16/1999 23:44, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/17/1999 03:21, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/17/1999 10:20, Sam Sampere
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/17/1999 11:12, David Kardelis
• Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, 11/17/1999 11:46, Roger Freedman
• Re: Resonance Demo, 11/17/1999 12:12, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, 11/17/1999 12:55, John Cooper
• Re: 20th century, 11/17/1999 14:53, Raymond A. Rogoway
• Re: 20th century, 11/17/1999 16:13, Chuck Britton
• Re: measurement using ruler -- was 20th century, 11/17/1999 17:17, Peter Schoch
• Re: Every teacher's fantasy --- on CBS tonight, 11/17/1999 18:14, Doug Craigen
• Problem with a problem, 11/17/1999 22:10, Harry L. Hightower
• tanning beds, 11/17/1999 22:39, fred brace
• Re: tanning beds, 11/17/1999 23:17, N. Pete Lohstreter
• Re: tanning beds, 11/18/1999 04:59, John Cooper
• Re: Inertia or the "amount of substance", 11/18/1999 05:32, Miguel A. Santos
• Re: 20th century, 11/18/1999 08:00, Clarence Bennett
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 12:38, Science Lab1
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 12:47, Richard Tarara
• Re: 20th century, 11/18/1999 13:02, Doug Craigen
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 13:40, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 13:54, Joseph Bellina
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 14:08, Van E. Neie
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 14:26, Leigh Palmer
• Re: 20th century, 11/18/1999 14:38, Sam Sampere
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 14:46, Lemmerhirt, Fred
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 15:15, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 15:26, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Problem with a problem, 11/18/1999 16:17, Science Lab1
• Re: 20th century, 11/18/1999 19:07, brian whatcott
• Tomorrow's Professor, 11/18/1999 22:56, Larry Cartwright
• Re: tanning beds, 11/19/1999 09:57, Robert A Cohen
• off topic (physics) on topic (education), 11/19/1999 10:03, Joel Rauber
• Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/19/1999 10:07, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: tanning beds, 11/19/1999 10:13, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/19/1999 11:28, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/19/1999 11:54, Richard Tarara
• Re: off topic (physics) on topic (education), 11/19/1999 12:14, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: tanning beds, 11/19/1999 12:56, Kirkpatrick, James
• Re: tanning beds, 11/19/1999 12:59, brian whatcott
• Re: 20th century, 11/19/1999 13:03, Peter Schoch
• Chinese laser pointer, 11/19/1999 20:46, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Chinese laser pointer, 11/19/1999 23:23, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/20/1999 07:46, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/20/1999 09:43, brian whatcott
• new textbook, 11/20/1999 09:44, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/20/1999 10:35, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/20/1999 13:11, brian whatcott
• coke can tapping, 11/20/1999 13:19, Leon Leonardo
• Re: coke can tapping, 11/20/1999 13:57, Doug Craigen
• New Virus: "Prilissa", 11/20/1999 16:23, Larry Cartwright
• Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M tragedy., 11/20/1999 18:30, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M tragedy., 11/20/1999 20:13, Richard Grandy
• Re: Are there physics lessons to be learned from Texas A&M traged y., 11/21/1999 13:09, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: coke can tapping, 11/21/1999 16:33, David Simmons
• Re: coke can tapping, 11/21/1999 17:41, brian whatcott
• NOAH's FLOOD/ancient coastline found, 11/21/1999 23:30, Jane Jackson
• Re: NOAH'S FLOOD/ancient coastline found, 11/21/1999 23:31, Jane Jackson
• current/water analogy, 11/22/1999 01:29, William J. Larson
• R: current/water analogy, 11/22/1999 05:30, Paolo Cavallo
• Re: R: current/water analogy, 11/22/1999 07:44, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: coke can tapping, 11/22/1999 09:53, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Electric gun, WORK ENERGY, 11/22/1999 10:14, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: coke can tapping, 11/22/1999 13:17, brian whatcott
• The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/22/1999 14:03, Joe Taylor
• Re: current/water analogy, 11/22/1999 14:10, William J. Larson
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/22/1999 20:15, Leigh Palmer
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/22/1999 20:55, Herbert H Gottlieb
• library holdings, 11/23/1999 12:17, David Kardelis
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/23/1999 13:24, Richard Tarara
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/23/1999 14:08, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/23/1999 14:27, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/23/1999 14:49, Leigh Palmer
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines, 11/23/1999 14:59, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/23/1999 17:47, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/23/1999 18:16, Leigh Palmer
• Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, 11/23/1999 19:31, Bob Yeend
• Re: Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, 11/23/1999 19:50, Leigh Palmer
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/23/1999 20:01, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/23/1999 20:17, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Simple Machines - May They Rise Again!, 11/24/1999 00:57, Zach Wolff
• Smoke rings, 11/24/1999 04:59, Kirkpatrick, James
• Re: Smoke rings, 11/24/1999 09:53, John Denker
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/24/1999 10:21, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: library holdings, 11/24/1999 16:34, Peter Schoch
• Electrical and Magnetic interactions: Cahabay and Sherwood, 11/24/1999 17:30, Brian McInnes
• Rolling Motion, 11/24/1999 18:23, Robert Carlson
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/24/1999 20:51, Leigh Palmer
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/24/1999 21:36, brian whatcott
• New radiation survival champ, 11/24/1999 22:36, Larry Cartwright
• Re: New radiation survival champ, 11/24/1999 22:52, brian whatcott
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/24/1999 22:57, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/24/1999 23:43, Leigh Palmer
• Thermodynamics of springs, 11/25/1999 07:57, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: New radiation survival champ, 11/25/1999 09:38, John Denker
• Re: Thermodynamics of springs, 11/25/1999 10:19, John Denker
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/25/1999 10:48, brian whatcott
• Re: Thermodynamics of springs, 11/25/1999 11:27, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 13:47, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Pedagogy, 11/25/1999 14:03, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 14:52, John Denker
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 14:57, brian whatcott
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 15:55, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 16:31, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 16:58, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo of Springs/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 17:46, brian whatcott
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 18:10, John Denker
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 21:31, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 22:03, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 22:51, brian whatcott
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/25/1999 22:52, Leigh Palmer
• Re: The Rise and Fall of Simple Machines., 11/26/1999 01:32, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/26/1999 01:44, Jim Green
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/26/1999 07:23, John Denker
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/26/1999 07:41, John Denker
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/26/1999 08:42, John Denker
• Less is More (but this is long!), 11/26/1999 09:28, Ed Eckel
• COLLISION, 11/26/1999 09:37, David Abineri
• Re: Less is More (but this is long!), 11/26/1999 09:53, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 10:05, brian whatcott
• Re: Definition of heat, 11/26/1999 10:11, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 10:39, Leigh Palmer
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 11:10, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 11:11, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 11:15, Bob Sciamanda
• Re: Less is More (but this is long!), 11/26/1999 12:34, Jerome Epstein
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar, 11/26/1999 13:07, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 13:47, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 13:53, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 14:09, Leigh Palmer
• Re: COLLISION, 11/26/1999 14:35, Jim Green
• Lightbulb Physics, 11/26/1999 15:44, Larry Cartwright
• Not ready for it. LONG, 11/26/1999 20:14, Ludwik Kowalski
• Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/26/1999 22:01, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/26/1999 23:10, Leigh Palmer
• Re: tensile strength of space-time, 11/26/1999 23:43, brian whatcott
• Re: Not ready for it. LONG, 11/27/1999 04:34, Margaret Mazzolini
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 07:50, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 09:46, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 10:05, John Denker
• Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/27/1999 10:58, Robert Carlson
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 11:33, brian whatcott
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 12:47, John Denker
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/27/1999 14:26, Jim Green
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/27/1999 15:24, Chuck Britton
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/27/1999 19:27, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/27/1999 21:49, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION, 11/28/1999 01:06, Shawn Knudsen
• COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 09:20, David Abineri
• Re: Definition of heat [and S], 11/28/1999 11:19, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/28/1999 12:08, Robert Carlson
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 12:41, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 13:37, brian whatcott
• Re: Not ready for it. (shorter), 11/28/1999 13:46, Joel Rauber
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 14:05, Chuck Britton
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 14:31, John Denker
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/28/1999 14:42, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2: real-world data, 11/28/1999 15:29, John Denker
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/28/1999 16:07, Robert Carlson
• Re: Rotating Stick -- reduction to quadratures, 11/28/1999 16:38, John Denker
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/28/1999 16:41, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 17:25, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 17:51, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 20:14, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 22:20, Leigh Palmer
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/28/1999 23:07, John Denker
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 00:05, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 00:42, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 01:02, Brian McInnes
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 01:41, Michael Edmiston
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 04:19, Jim Green
• Joule etc, 11/29/1999 04:46, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 04:49, Jim Green
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 07:52, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 07:57, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 08:22, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 09:11, Michael N. Monce
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 09:27, Chuck Britton
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 10:09, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 10:46, John Denker
• Re: verbiage, 11/29/1999 10:48, John Denker
• Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/29/1999 15:16, Ray Enzweiler
• Re: Thermo/Sidebar (signatures please), 11/29/1999 15:19, Joel Rauber
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 15:36, Jim Green
• The Physics InfoMall for the Mac, 11/29/1999 15:51, Richard Hake
• Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/29/1999 15:51, Joel Rauber
• Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/29/1999 15:52, Bob Muir
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 15:54, Joel Rauber
• Re: (signatures please), 11/29/1999 15:56, Jim Green
• Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/29/1999 16:20, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/29/1999 17:04, Zach Wolff
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 17:17, Brian McInnes
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 17:19, Chuck Britton
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/29/1999 17:58, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 19:18, Brian McInnes
• [Fwd: neural timing and schizophrenia], 11/29/1999 19:38, Raymond A. Rogoway
• Re: [Fwd: neural timing and schizophrenia], 11/29/1999 20:05, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 20:29, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 21:16, Jim Green
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 22:27, brian whatcott
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/29/1999 23:43, Jim Green
• Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 06:02, Ed Schweber
• Elliptical functions or integrals, 11/30/1999 07:12, David Bowman
• Re: Electronic registration with advising holds?, 11/30/1999 08:13, David E. Clark
• Elliptical functions or integrals, 11/30/1999 08:27, Lerner Desks
• Re: teaching "higher" math functions, 11/30/1999 08:42, John Denker
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/30/1999 09:40, Michael N. Monce
• Video Equipment, 11/30/1999 09:53, Mark Carrington
• Re: COLLISION 2, 11/30/1999 10:05, John Denker
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 10:20, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 10:52, John Mallinckrodt
• Re: Spreadsheet Analysis of Rotating Stick, 11/30/1999 11:36, Robert A Cohen
• Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, 11/30/1999 11:42, Lerner Desks
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 11:54, Daniel Schroeder
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 12:04, Michael Edmiston
• Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, 11/30/1999 12:56, William J. Larson
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 13:33, James S. Marsh
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 13:54, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 14:10, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 14:13, Leigh Palmer
• Photons was COLLISION 2, 11/30/1999 14:33, Jim Green
• Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, 11/30/1999 15:15, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Amplitude and pitch of sound waves, 11/30/1999 15:41, Kate Wilcox
• "Big Bang" Party, 11/30/1999 16:28, Shapiro, Mark
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 17:27, Daniel Schroeder
• Re: Pure mathematics and problems for physicists too?, 11/30/1999 17:44, Lerner Desks
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 18:03, Ludwik Kowalski
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 19:05, Samuel Held
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 19:16, Ed Schweber
• Re: Is Particle Physics At Risk of Becoming Tautological?, 11/30/1999 19:32, Daniel Schroeder