Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
:^) Sorry Joel. Been distracted at times. I'm afraid we've all felt "outThere two
problems: (1) It is almost impossible (if not actually) to
measure *all*
the forces without assuming the answer to the question of
whether or not
the sum of the forces is, first. (2) We don't actually
measure force. We
measure observable effects, experiences for which force is
the explanation.
Apparently "Nature" can't or won't tell us "the answer," so we have to
decide based on other criteria. Perhaps if we thought of
force not as a
causal agent, but an explanatory entity...
I can't resist pointing out that Dewey's post supports a position and
provocative statement I have made in the past. Perhaps, the support is not
unequivocal, however.
"Force meters (gauges, what-have-you) work by measuring accelerations".
Dewey, where were you when I needed defenders? :-))
Joel