Phys-L List Archive (by Thread) of February, 1999

Search Archives

• Cool Fact: Oldest Standard Units, William J. Larson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cool Fact: Oldest Standard Units, Gary Karshner
• Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, Derek Chirnside
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, Martha Takats
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, John Gastineau
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, John Gastineau
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, B. Esser
  • Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, Raymond A. Rogoway
• a drag equation based on "disk balloons", William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a drag equation based on "disk balloons", Roger Freedman
  • Re: a drag equation based on "disk balloons", William Beaty
• Re: metal model of dielectric, John S. Denker
• Re: Physics Classroom Features, Timothy Usher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physics Classroom Features, John P Lewis
• Re: Verify and comment, please., brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Verify and comment, please., Robert W. Harris
  • Verify and comment, please., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Verify and comment, please., Tim Sullivan x5830
  • Re: Verify and comment, please., E. Leonard Jossem
  • Re: Verify and comment, please., L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: Verify and comment, please., Ron Ebert
• Train physics, William J. Larson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Train physics, Lawrence E. L'Hote
  • Re: Train physics, brian whatcott
• Re: Physics Internships/co-ops, Tom Carter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physics Internships/co-ops, Vern Lindberg
• Physics lesson with Hypercard, Leon Leonardo
• closing discussion on Faraday isolators, Carl E. Mungan
• Forwarded announcement, Dick Smith
• Re: Internship announcement, David Marx
• Re: Conserving Q/Faraday, Ludwik Kowalski
• Lasers and titanium dioxide, William Beaty
• Fields, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fields, Philip Zell
  • Re: Fields, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Fields, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Fields, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re[2]: Fields, Philip Zell
  • Re: Fields, Jim Green
  • Re[2]: Fields, Philip Zell
  • Re: Re[2]: Fields, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Fields, Bob Sciamanda
• temperature jumps, Mark Sylvester
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: temperature jumps, Karl Trappe
  • Re: temperature jumps, John Gastineau
  • Re: temperature jumps, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: temperature jumps, brian whatcott
  • Re: temperature jumps, Mark Sylvester
  • Re: temperature jumps, brian whatcott
  • Re: temperature jumps, Miguel A. Santos
• Web Based Science Materials, brian whatcott
• Usenet -- Off topic, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Usenet -- Off topic, Robert W. Harris
  • Re: Usenet -- Off topic, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Usenet -- Off topic, Jon Bell
• Re: Fields can be nonlinear, John S. Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, John Gastineau
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Fields can be nonlinear, John Gastineau
• TEST,delete:, Miguel A. Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TEST,delete:, brian whatcott
  • Re: TEST,delete:, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: TEST,delete:, brian whatcott
  • Re[2]: TEST,delete:, Philip Zell
  • Re: TEST,delete:, Allen Shotwell
• [no subject], Miguel A. Santos
• Lost in (cyber) space ?, Miguel A. Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lost in (cyber) space ?, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: Lost in (cyber) space ?, Miguel A. Santos
• Course Syllabi Online, Warren Hein
• New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Off-topic - FW: A helpful hint for Netscape mail users. (fwd), Samuel Held
• Re: Off-topic - Worm, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Off-topic - Worm, Samuel Held
• Test/delete, mjoshua
• Use of CBL's, mjoshua
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Use of CBL's, Jim Ealy
  • Re: Use of CBL's, David Simmons
  • Re: Use of CBL's, mjoshua
  • Re: Use of CBL's, Pete Joenks
• critique of "disk balloons", John S. Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: critique of "disk balloons", William Beaty
• Book bonanza!, Donald E. Simanek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Book bonanza!, Donald E. Simanek
• Re: "polarization" of neutrons, GARY HEMMINGER
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "polarization" of neutrons, Paul Zitzewitz
  • Re: "polarization" of neutrons, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Conceptual Calculus - correct file now on net 2/8/99, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• R: Re: Use of CBL's, Paolo Cavallo
• can anyone recommend a mechanics text?, Daniel Schroeder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: can anyone recommend a mechanics text?, Allen Miller
• All that glitters is not gold, Paul Goodman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: All that glitters is not gold, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: All that glitters is not gold, Stan Dodds
  • Re: All that glitters is not gold, Samuel Held
  • Re: All that glitters is not gold, Jerome Epstein
• Re: All that glisters is not gold, brian whatcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Tom McCarthy
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, brian whatcott
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Brian McInnes
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, paul o johnson
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, William Beaty
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, brian whatcott
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Brian McInnes
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, William Beaty
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, paul o johnson
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, brian whatcott
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Brian McInnes
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, paul o johnson
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Chuck Britton
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, William Beaty
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Brian McInnes
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, brian whatcott
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, paul o johnson
  • Re: All that glisters is not gold, Ian Sefton
• Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., Clarence Bennett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., David Strasburger-fac
  • Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., Jim Green
  • Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., brian whatcott
• Re: neutron polarization, Paul Zitzewitz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: neutron polarization, Paul Zitzewitz
  • Re: neutron polarization, GARY HEMMINGER
  • Re: neutron polarization, Jerry Lisantti
  • Re: neutron polarization, Hugh Haskell
  • Re: neutron polarization, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: neutron polarization, Samuel Held
• test, Pete Joenks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • test, mjoshua
• trebuchet, Pete Joenks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: trebuchet, Roger Haar
  • Re: trebuchet, Donald E. Simanek
  • Re: trebuchet, Chuck Britton
  • Re: trebuchet, paul o johnson
  • Re: trebuchet, Donald E. Simanek
  • Re: trebuchet, James McLean
  • Re: trebuchet, Glenn Knapp
  • Re: trebuchet, brian whatcott
  • Re: trebuchet, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trebuchet, Donald E. Simanek
  • Re: trebuchet, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trebuchet, Donald E. Simanek
  • Re: trebuchet, brian whatcott
  • Re: trebuchet, Donald E. Simanek
• biology/chemistry list?, Mark Sylvester
• Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Production of Synchrotron Radiation, James G. Pengra
  • Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, brian whatcott
  • Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, Jim Green
  • Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, Brian McInnes
  • Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, Sam Sampere
  • Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, Daniel Schroeder
• First year concept baseline test, Colin Taylor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: First year concept baseline test, Robert W. Harris
  • Re: First year concept baseline test, Richard Hake
  • Re: First year concept baseline test, Richard Hake
• Re: cbl ideas, release time grant, Dan Burns
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • cbl ideas, release time grant, Leon Leonardo
  • Re: cbl ideas, release time grant, Derek Chirnside
• [no subject], Quist, Oren Phys
• Fields -- was All that glisters, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fields -- was All that glisters, William Beaty
• first msg from alien civilization..., William Beaty
• Is Windows 3.x dead?, Robert Carlson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Robert Curtis
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Michael N. Monce
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, David Roberts
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Larry Smith
  • Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, Timothy Usher
• Re: Jane Jackson, Jerome Epstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jane Jackson, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Jane Jackson, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Jane Jackson, Jerome Epstein
• Members' Webpages Directory, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Members' Webpages Directory, Shapiro, Mark
• Delete; test., Miguel A. Santos
• Re: Fields etc, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fields etc, Rauber, Joel Phys
  • Re: Fields etc, Sam Sampere
  • Re: Fields etc, David Bowman
  • Re: Fields etc, Van E. Neie
  • Re: Fields etc, James McLean
  • Re: Fields etc, David Bowman
  • Re: Fields etc, William Beaty
  • Re: Fields etc, William Beaty
  • Re: Fields etc, Phil Parker
• Charging by Induction, Hasan Fakhruddin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Charging by Induction, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Charging by Induction, Hasan Fakhruddin
• Re: trivial pedagogy, Rick Tarara
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Mark Sylvester
  • trivial pedagogy, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Herb Schulz
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: trivial pedagogy, Patrick Briggs
• American Journal of Physics Online, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
• Not MORE books?, Donald E. Simanek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Not MORE books?, Paul Middents
  • Re: Not MORE books?, Donald E. Simanek
  • Re: Not MORE books?, Donald E. Simanek
• A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Ed Schweber
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Philip Zell
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Samuel Held
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Ed Schweber
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Ed Schweber
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Herb Schulz
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, David Bowman
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Herb Schulz
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Ed Schweber
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Brian McInnes
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Ed Schweber
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Samuel Held
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, James W. Wheeler
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Samuel Held
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Samuel Held
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Samuel Held
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Maurice Barnhill
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, James W. Wheeler
• Re: Fields, mechanical analogies, urban legends, etc., John S. Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fields, mechanical analogies, urban legends, etc., Daniel L. MacIsaac
• motion detector with air track, mjoshua
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: motion detector with air track, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: motion detector with air track, mjoshua
  • Re: motion detector with air track, brian whatcott
• Re: Fields etc (fwd), William Beaty
• Chemistry demonstrations via the web, Paul Zitzewitz
• (Wall) chart of the nuclides, Russ Hilleke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, Raymond A. Rogoway
  • Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, Warren Hein
  • Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, Eric T. Lane
• Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, John C. Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, Hasan Fakhruddin
  • Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, brian whatcott
• Re: Why "i" for current?, John P Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why "i" for current?, Allen Brown
  • Re: Why "i" for current?, Mathieu Dubreuil
  • Re: Why "i" for current?, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Why "i" for current?, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: Why "i" for current?, Miguel A. Santos
• remove from list, brenda michelle andrews
• Re: Energy Budgets, Doug Craigen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Energy Budgets, Dan Burns
  • Energy Budgets, James W. Wheeler
• Neutron polarizability: some numbers, Paul Zitzewitz
• Free Journals, Steven T. Ratliff
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Free Journals, kyle forinash
• Last chance for books!, Donald E. Simanek
• I did not know this., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I did not know this., James W. Wheeler
  • Re: I did not know this., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: I did not know this., crawford j maccallum
  • Re: I did not know this., Tom Carter
  • Re: I did not know this., Bob Muir
  • Re: I did not know this., Sam Sampere
  • Re: I did not know this., Ken Fox
  • Re: I did not know this., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: I did not know this., brian whatcott
  • Re: I did not know this., jeff marx
  • Re: I did not know this., Sam Sampere
  • Re: I did not know this., brian whatcott
  • Re: I did not know this., Ken Caviness
  • Re: I did not know this., Mark Sylvester
  • Re: I did not know this., Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: I did not know this., Martha Takats
  • Re: I did not know this., David J. Hamilton
  • Re: I did not know this., Bob Muir
  • Re: I did not know this., Alex Burr
  • Re: I did not know this., Roger Haar
  • Re: I did not know this., Ken Fox
  • Re: I did not know this., brian whatcott
• AJP Journals Taken, Steven T. Ratliff
• A question on inelastic relativistic collisions-extension, David Bowman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions-extension, James W. Wheeler
• Balance on one foot, Homer B. James
• Re: Balls (square wheels), Clarence Bennett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), William Beaty
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), Sam Sampere
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), William Beaty
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: Balls (square wheels), Phil Parker
• Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, Mary Dussault
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, Karl Trappe
  • Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, Chuck Britton
• physics teacher education 1880-1900, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • physics teacher education 1880-1900, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
  • Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, Glenn Knapp
  • Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, Herbert H Gottlieb
• Electrostatics problem, Ken Fox
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, brian whatcott
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Allen Miller
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: Electrostatics Problem, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electrostatics Problem, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Miguel A. Santos
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Electrostatics problem, Miguel A. Santos
• request, Jim Braunsdorf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: request, Karl Trappe
  • Re: request, James McLean
• CBL effectiveness studies?, Leon Leonardo
• cbl pressure probe, Leon Leonardo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cbl pressure probe, Norman Lohstreter
• Cool Fusion, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cool Fusion, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Cool Fusion, James McLean
  • Re: Cool Fusion, William Beaty
  • Re: Cool Fusion, Jim Green
  • Re: Cool Fusion, David Bowman
• [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], Dayton Lab
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], Doug Craigen
  • Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], Rondo JEFFERY
  • Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], Hugh Haskell
  • Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], Clarence Bennett
• evidence of cbl value in classroom, Leon Leonardo
• Elements, Jim Green
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Elements, David Bowman
  • Re: Elements, Samuel Held
  • Re: Elements, brian whatcott
  • Re: Elements, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Elements, Daniel Schroeder
  • Re: Elements, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Info. for Atlanta meeting, Samuel Held
• Protection from Freezing, Patrick Whippey
• FW: CIAC Bulletin J-032: Windows Backdoors Update II, Samuel Held