Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions

["James W. Wheeler" <jwheeler@EAGLE.LHUP.EDU>]

Actually I'm thinking more in terms of a microscopic field theory in a
hot, dense, MOVING, background than in a macroscopic contribution to e.g.
gravitation.  The result would be a lot closer to Schwinger source terms!

On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Samuel Held wrote:

> James,
>         You are absolutely correct that there is a component of the
> stress-energy tensor that contains the temperature.  It is rather messy
> but I can try to put it up here or send it to you personally if you
> wish.  I wish I understood this really well, but I think that is limited
> to only a couple of people who have a true intuitive feel for
> relativity, one of which is John A. Wheeler (you are close though).
>
>
> Sam Held