Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of February, 1999

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Search Archives

Cool Fact: Oldest Standard Units, 02/01/1999 03:02, William J. Larson
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 04:18, Derek Chirnside
a drag equation based on "disk balloons", 02/01/1999 06:05, William Beaty
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 06:10, Martha Takats
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 10:12, John Gastineau
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 10:22, Joseph Bellina
Re: metal model of dielectric, 02/01/1999 10:25, John S. Denker
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 10:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 11:37, John Gastineau
Re: Physics Classroom Features, 02/01/1999 12:25, Timothy Usher
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 13:04, brian whatcott
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 13:14, Robert W. Harris
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 13:21, B. Esser
Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 13:25, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 14:10, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 14:14, E. Leonard Jossem
Re: Cool Fact: Oldest Standard Units, 02/01/1999 15:06, Gary Karshner
Re: Free software ELECTRICITY, 02/01/1999 15:53, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/01/1999 17:02, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Physics Classroom Features, 02/01/1999 17:42, John P Lewis
Train physics, 02/02/1999 02:55, William J. Larson
Re: Train physics, 02/02/1999 05:03, Lawrence E. L'Hote
Re: Train physics, 02/02/1999 07:34, brian whatcott
Re: a drag equation based on "disk balloons", 02/02/1999 10:42, Roger Freedman
Re: Physics Internships/co-ops, 02/02/1999 10:54, Tom Carter
Re: Physics Internships/co-ops, 02/02/1999 12:15, Vern Lindberg
Physics lesson with Hypercard, 02/02/1999 14:13, Leon Leonardo
closing discussion on Faraday isolators, 02/02/1999 17:29, Carl E. Mungan
Re: Verify and comment, please., 02/03/1999 03:20, Ron Ebert
Re: a drag equation based on "disk balloons", 02/03/1999 11:28, William Beaty
Forwarded announcement, 02/03/1999 11:38, Dick Smith
Re: Internship announcement, 02/03/1999 14:27, David Marx
Re: Conserving Q/Faraday, 02/03/1999 14:50, Ludwik Kowalski
Lasers and titanium dioxide, 02/03/1999 14:57, William Beaty
Fields, 02/03/1999 15:48, Jim Green
temperature jumps, 02/04/1999 06:08, Mark Sylvester
Re: temperature jumps, 02/04/1999 07:36, Karl Trappe
Web Based Science Materials, 02/04/1999 08:00, brian whatcott
Re: temperature jumps, 02/04/1999 08:09, John Gastineau
Re: Fields, 02/04/1999 09:55, Philip Zell
Re: Fields, 02/04/1999 11:27, Gary Karshner
Re: Fields, 02/04/1999 12:21, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: temperature jumps, 02/04/1999 12:35, Miguel A. Santos
Usenet -- Off topic, 02/04/1999 13:06, Jim Green
Re: Fields, 02/04/1999 13:35, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/04/1999 14:23, John S. Denker
Re[2]: Fields, 02/04/1999 14:32, Philip Zell
Re: Usenet -- Off topic, 02/04/1999 14:51, Robert W. Harris
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/04/1999 14:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Usenet -- Off topic, 02/04/1999 15:00, Rick Tarara
Re: temperature jumps, 02/04/1999 18:35, brian whatcott
Re: Usenet -- Off topic, 02/04/1999 22:13, Jon Bell
Re: Fields, 02/05/1999 00:39, Jim Green
TEST,delete:, 02/05/1999 03:47, Miguel A. Santos
Re: TEST,delete:, 02/05/1999 08:02, brian whatcott
[no subject], 02/05/1999 10:25, Miguel A. Santos
Re[2]: Fields, 02/05/1999 10:57, Philip Zell
Lost in (cyber) space ?, 02/05/1999 11:16, Miguel A. Santos
Course Syllabi Online, 02/05/1999 11:20, Warren Hein
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/05/1999 11:56, Chuck Britton
Re: Lost in (cyber) space ?, 02/05/1999 14:23, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Re[2]: Fields, 02/05/1999 14:47, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, 02/05/1999 14:58, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/05/1999 15:29, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/05/1999 15:39, John Gastineau
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/05/1999 17:17, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, 02/05/1999 17:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: temperature jumps, 02/05/1999 18:49, Mark Sylvester
Off-topic - FW: A helpful hint for Netscape mail users. (fwd), 02/05/1999 20:52, Samuel Held
Re: Fields, 02/05/1999 21:32, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Off-topic - Worm, 02/05/1999 22:26, brian whatcott
Re: Lost in (cyber) space ?, 02/06/1999 07:01, Miguel A. Santos
Re: Fields can be nonlinear, 02/06/1999 08:53, John Gastineau
Test/delete, 02/06/1999 11:31, mjoshua
Use of CBL's, 02/06/1999 12:00, mjoshua
Re: Off-topic - Worm, 02/06/1999 12:01, Samuel Held
Re: New kind of calculus text - Conceptual Calculus, 02/06/1999 18:45, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: TEST,delete:, 02/07/1999 05:32, Miguel A. Santos
critique of "disk balloons", 02/07/1999 12:56, John S. Denker
Re: TEST,delete:, 02/07/1999 14:04, brian whatcott
Re: temperature jumps, 02/07/1999 20:34, brian whatcott
Book bonanza!, 02/07/1999 22:16, Donald E. Simanek
Re: temperature jumps, 02/08/1999 03:58, Miguel A. Santos
Re[2]: TEST,delete:, 02/08/1999 10:06, Philip Zell
Re: "polarization" of neutrons, 02/08/1999 10:15, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: critique of "disk balloons", 02/08/1999 11:49, William Beaty
Conceptual Calculus - correct file now on net 2/8/99, 02/08/1999 12:40, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: TEST,delete:, 02/08/1999 12:43, Allen Shotwell
Re: Use of CBL's, 02/08/1999 18:30, Jim Ealy
Re: Book bonanza!, 02/08/1999 20:51, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Use of CBL's, 02/08/1999 20:58, David Simmons
Re: Use of CBL's, 02/09/1999 10:33, mjoshua
R: Re: Use of CBL's, 02/09/1999 14:39, Paolo Cavallo
can anyone recommend a mechanics text?, 02/09/1999 17:30, Daniel Schroeder
All that glitters is not gold, 02/09/1999 17:59, Paul Goodman
Re: All that glitters is not gold, 02/09/1999 18:39, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: All that glitters is not gold, 02/09/1999 18:44, Stan Dodds
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/09/1999 18:58, brian whatcott
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/09/1999 20:38, Tom McCarthy
Re: All that glitters is not gold, 02/09/1999 20:39, Samuel Held
Re: All that glitters is not gold, 02/09/1999 20:51, Jerome Epstein
Re: can anyone recommend a mechanics text?, 02/09/1999 20:57, Allen Miller
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/09/1999 21:37, brian whatcott
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/09/1999 22:21, Brian McInnes
Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., 02/09/1999 22:32, Clarence Bennett
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/10/1999 09:30, paul o johnson
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 09:37, Paul Zitzewitz
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 09:52, Paul Zitzewitz
test, 02/10/1999 11:53, Pete Joenks
Re: Use of CBL's, 02/10/1999 11:57, Pete Joenks
Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., 02/10/1999 13:55, David Strasburger-fac
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 14:10, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 14:37, Jerry Lisantti
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 16:56, Hugh Haskell
Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., 02/10/1999 19:17, Jim Green
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/10/1999 20:11, William Beaty
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 20:27, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: neutron polarization, 02/10/1999 21:58, Samuel Held
Re: Leidenfrost effect on prime time..., 02/10/1999 22:38, brian whatcott
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/10/1999 23:04, brian whatcott
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/11/1999 02:17, Brian McInnes
trebuchet, 02/11/1999 11:36, Pete Joenks
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/11/1999 12:01, William Beaty
Re: trebuchet, 02/11/1999 13:44, Roger Haar
Re: trebuchet, 02/11/1999 16:15, Donald E. Simanek
biology/chemistry list?, 02/11/1999 16:49, Mark Sylvester
Re: trebuchet, 02/11/1999 16:55, Chuck Britton
Re: trebuchet, 02/11/1999 18:28, paul o johnson
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/11/1999 18:57, Ludwik Kowalski
Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/11/1999 19:35, James G. Pengra
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/11/1999 20:37, brian whatcott
First year concept baseline test, 02/11/1999 20:56, Colin Taylor
Re: trebuchet, 02/11/1999 21:33, Donald E. Simanek
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/11/1999 23:14, paul o johnson
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 00:08, brian whatcott
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/12/1999 03:15, Jim Green
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/12/1999 03:43, Brian McInnes
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 03:48, Brian McInnes
Re: cbl ideas, release time grant, 02/12/1999 06:25, Dan Burns
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/12/1999 09:09, Sam Sampere
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 09:25, paul o johnson
[no subject], 02/12/1999 11:03, Quist, Oren Phys
Re: trebuchet, 02/12/1999 12:26, James McLean
cbl ideas, release time grant, 02/12/1999 13:06, Leon Leonardo
Re: Production of Synchrotron Radiation, 02/12/1999 14:59, Daniel Schroeder
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 16:45, Chuck Britton
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 16:52, William Beaty
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 18:00, Brian McInnes
Re: cbl ideas, release time grant, 02/12/1999 18:31, Derek Chirnside
Fields -- was All that glisters, 02/12/1999 18:35, Jim Green
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/12/1999 19:45, brian whatcott
Re: trebuchet, 02/12/1999 21:31, Glenn Knapp
Re: trebuchet, 02/12/1999 22:05, brian whatcott
first msg from alien civilization..., 02/13/1999 04:17, William Beaty
Re: trebuchet, 02/13/1999 06:55, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: trebuchet, 02/13/1999 12:15, Donald E. Simanek
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/13/1999 14:42, paul o johnson
Re: Fields -- was All that glisters, 02/13/1999 17:55, William Beaty
Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/13/1999 18:52, Robert Carlson
Re: trebuchet, 02/13/1999 19:32, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/13/1999 22:12, Robert Curtis
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/13/1999 22:42, Doug Craigen
Re: trebuchet, 02/14/1999 01:04, Donald E. Simanek
Re: First year concept baseline test, 02/14/1999 09:17, Robert W. Harris
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/14/1999 09:57, Michael N. Monce
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/14/1999 11:53, Rick Tarara
Re: trebuchet, 02/14/1999 16:14, brian whatcott
Re: All that glisters is not gold, 02/14/1999 18:24, Ian Sefton
Re: Jane Jackson, 02/14/1999 20:56, Jerome Epstein
Members' Webpages Directory, 02/14/1999 23:35, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: "polarization" of neutrons, 02/15/1999 08:28, Paul Zitzewitz
Delete; test., 02/15/1999 12:12, Miguel A. Santos
Re: First year concept baseline test, 02/15/1999 12:42, Richard Hake
Re: Members' Webpages Directory, 02/15/1999 13:11, Shapiro, Mark
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 13:19, Jim Green
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 13:37, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 13:53, Sam Sampere
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 14:12, David Bowman
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 14:16, Van E. Neie
Charging by Induction, 02/15/1999 14:41, Hasan Fakhruddin
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/15/1999 14:57, David Roberts
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/15/1999 16:43, Larry Smith
Re: Is Windows 3.x dead?, 02/15/1999 18:08, Timothy Usher
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 18:11, James McLean
Re: Fields etc, 02/15/1999 19:37, David Bowman
Re: trebuchet, 02/15/1999 21:17, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Charging by Induction, 02/15/1999 21:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: "polarization" of neutrons, 02/15/1999 22:28, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Fields etc, 02/16/1999 02:44, William Beaty
Re: Fields etc, 02/16/1999 02:56, William Beaty
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 12:36, Rick Tarara
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 12:48, Mark Sylvester
trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 13:12, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 14:11, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 15:17, Herb Schulz
Re: Jane Jackson, 02/16/1999 15:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 15:34, Miguel A. Santos
Re: Jane Jackson, 02/16/1999 15:38, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/16/1999 17:33, Ludwik Kowalski
American Journal of Physics Online, 02/16/1999 17:47, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: Jane Jackson, 02/16/1999 21:07, Jerome Epstein
Not MORE books?, 02/16/1999 23:16, Donald E. Simanek
Re: First year concept baseline test, 02/17/1999 00:19, Richard Hake
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/17/1999 02:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/17/1999 02:52, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Charging by Induction, 02/17/1999 07:48, Hasan Fakhruddin
A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/17/1999 10:57, Ed Schweber
Re: trivial pedagogy, 02/17/1999 12:14, Patrick Briggs
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/17/1999 12:30, Philip Zell
Re: Fields, mechanical analogies, urban legends, etc., 02/17/1999 12:32, John S. Denker
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/17/1999 12:39, Samuel Held
test, 02/17/1999 17:29, mjoshua
motion detector with air track, 02/17/1999 17:40, mjoshua
Re: motion detector with air track, 02/17/1999 18:25, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: motion detector with air track, 02/17/1999 18:31, mjoshua
Re: Not MORE books?, 02/17/1999 18:44, Paul Middents
Re: Fields, mechanical analogies, urban legends, etc., 02/17/1999 18:44, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: motion detector with air track, 02/17/1999 18:49, brian whatcott
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/17/1999 22:10, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Fields etc (fwd), 02/17/1999 22:52, William Beaty
Re: Not MORE books?, 02/17/1999 23:15, Donald E. Simanek
Chemistry demonstrations via the web, 02/18/1999 07:49, Paul Zitzewitz
(Wall) chart of the nuclides, 02/18/1999 13:42, Russ Hilleke
Re: Fields etc, 02/18/1999 13:55, Phil Parker
Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, 02/18/1999 14:30, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, 02/18/1999 15:05, Warren Hein
Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, 02/18/1999 16:23, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 00:18, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 06:50, Ed Schweber
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 07:05, Miguel A. Santos
Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, 02/19/1999 09:19, John C. Park
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 11:43, Miguel A. Santos
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 12:34, Ed Schweber
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/19/1999 16:16, John P Lewis
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 16:55, Herb Schulz
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 17:21, David Bowman
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 17:28, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/19/1999 17:59, Allen Brown
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 18:21, Herb Schulz
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 20:36, Ed Schweber
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/19/1999 21:39, Mathieu Dubreuil
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/19/1999 22:27, Bob Sciamanda
remove from list, 02/19/1999 23:17, brenda michelle andrews
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 05:04, Brian McInnes
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/20/1999 05:49, Miguel A. Santos
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 06:12, Miguel A. Santos
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 06:25, Miguel A. Santos
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 08:44, Ed Schweber
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 09:43, Samuel Held
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 13:58, James W. Wheeler
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 19:31, Samuel Held
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/20/1999 22:02, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 10:20, Samuel Held
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 15:11, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 16:56, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 16:57, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/21/1999 17:03, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 17:23, Samuel Held
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 17:39, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/21/1999 22:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Energy Budgets, 02/22/1999 02:55, Doug Craigen
Re: Why "i" for current?, 02/22/1999 03:55, Miguel A. Santos
Neutron polarizability: some numbers, 02/22/1999 04:41, Paul Zitzewitz
Free Journals, 02/22/1999 04:56, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: Energy Budgets, 02/22/1999 06:53, Dan Burns
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/22/1999 13:07, Maurice Barnhill
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/22/1999 13:39, Miguel A. Santos
Energy Budgets, 02/22/1999 14:26, James W. Wheeler
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions, 02/22/1999 14:29, James W. Wheeler
Last chance for books!, 02/22/1999 22:53, Donald E. Simanek
I did not know this., 02/23/1999 02:00, Ludwik Kowalski
AJP Journals Taken, 02/23/1999 05:08, Steven T. Ratliff
A question on inelastic relativistic collisions-extension, 02/23/1999 06:09, David Bowman
Free Journals, 02/23/1999 09:45, kyle forinash
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 10:09, James W. Wheeler
Re: A question on inelastic relativistic collisions-extension, 02/23/1999 10:32, James W. Wheeler
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 14:18, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 15:24, crawford j maccallum
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 15:59, Tom Carter
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 16:11, Bob Muir
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 16:42, Sam Sampere
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 16:43, Ken Fox
Balance on one foot, 02/23/1999 17:00, Homer B. James
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 17:15, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/23/1999 18:07, Clarence Bennett
Re: Not MORE books?, 02/23/1999 18:11, Donald E. Simanek
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 18:12, brian whatcott
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/23/1999 18:43, Clarence Bennett
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 20:01, jeff marx
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 20:38, Sam Sampere
Re: I did not know this., 02/23/1999 22:03, brian whatcott
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 00:23, Ken Caviness
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 02:01, Mark Sylvester
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 03:34, Miguel A. Santos
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 04:20, Martha Takats
Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, 02/24/1999 08:14, Mary Dussault
Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, 02/24/1999 08:25, Karl Trappe
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/24/1999 09:24, William Beaty
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 09:39, David J. Hamilton
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/24/1999 11:27, Sam Sampere
physics teacher education 1880-1900, 02/24/1999 12:25, Wilson Gonzalez-espada
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/24/1999 12:33, William Beaty
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 12:59, Bob Muir
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/24/1999 16:15, L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 16:45, Alex Burr
Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, 02/24/1999 16:46, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 17:16, Roger Haar
Re: I did not know this., 02/24/1999 17:39, Ken Fox
Electrostatics problem, 02/24/1999 17:51, Ken Fox
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/24/1999 21:23, brian whatcott
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/24/1999 22:44, Allen Miller
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/25/1999 00:15, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/25/1999 00:53, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/25/1999 01:06, Bob Sciamanda
physics teacher education 1880-1900, 02/25/1999 11:03, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
request, 02/25/1999 14:01, Jim Braunsdorf
CBL effectiveness studies?, 02/25/1999 14:57, Leon Leonardo
cbl pressure probe, 02/25/1999 15:15, Leon Leonardo
Re: Electrostatics Problem, 02/25/1999 17:16, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: Electrostatics Problem, 02/25/1999 17:41, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: cbl pressure probe, 02/25/1999 20:34, Norman Lohstreter
Cool Fusion, 02/26/1999 00:51, Jim Green
Re: Cool Fusion, 02/26/1999 03:02, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: request, 02/26/1999 10:50, Karl Trappe
Re: Balls (square wheels), 02/26/1999 13:32, Phil Parker
Re: Cool Fusion, 02/26/1999 13:42, James McLean
Re: request, 02/26/1999 13:51, James McLean
Re: Cool Fusion, 02/26/1999 14:19, William Beaty
Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, 02/26/1999 16:16, Hasan Fakhruddin
[Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], 02/26/1999 16:50, Dayton Lab
Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, 02/26/1999 16:59, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], 02/26/1999 17:40, Doug Craigen
Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], 02/26/1999 17:52, Rondo JEFFERY
evidence of cbl value in classroom, 02/26/1999 19:04, Leon Leonardo
Re: Fellowship Opportunity in Science Education, 02/26/1999 19:13, brian whatcott
Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], 02/26/1999 19:26, Hugh Haskell
Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, 02/26/1999 21:47, Glenn Knapp
Re: physics teacher education 1880-1900, 02/26/1999 22:18, Herbert H Gottlieb
Re: Cool Fusion, 02/27/1999 02:11, Jim Green
Re: Cool Fusion, 02/27/1999 06:21, David Bowman
Re: [Fwd: Flight from San Francisco to New York], 02/27/1999 11:00, Clarence Bennett
Elements, 02/27/1999 12:04, Jim Green
Re: Elements, 02/27/1999 12:44, David Bowman
Re: Elements, 02/27/1999 13:39, Samuel Held
Info. for Atlanta meeting, 02/27/1999 13:49, Samuel Held
Re: Elements, 02/27/1999 15:18, brian whatcott
Re: Elements, 02/27/1999 17:00, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Protection from Freezing, 02/27/1999 20:18, Patrick Whippey
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/28/1999 07:11, Ludwik Kowalski
FW: CIAC Bulletin J-032: Windows Backdoors Update II, 02/28/1999 09:39, Samuel Held
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/28/1999 13:21, Miguel A. Santos
Re: Elements, 02/28/1999 13:30, Daniel Schroeder
Re: (Wall) chart of the nuclides, 02/28/1999 16:35, Eric T. Lane
Re: Elements, 02/28/1999 20:51, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/28/1999 20:54, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Electrostatics problem, 02/28/1999 23:44, Miguel A. Santos
Re: I did not know this., 03/01/1999 00:27, brian whatcott
Re: I did not know this: balancing experiment, 02/26/2001 15:59, Chuck Britton

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Mail converted by MHonArc