Phys-L List Archive (by Thread) of July, 1999

Search Archives

• [no subject], Eduardo García Parada
• Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Brian McInnes
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, brian whatcott
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, William Beaty
  • Re: "Faraday's Disk" which started it all, brian whatcott
• Re: physics of sound texts, Warren Hein
• momentum, Henry Kuhlman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: momentum, David J. Hamilton
  • Re: momentum, John Trammell
  • Re: momentum, Roger Haar
  • Re: momentum, Peter Mccardell
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, Samuel Held
  • Re: momentum, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, Gary Karshner
  • Re: momentum, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: momentum, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: momentum, Peter Vajk
  • Re: momentum, brian whatcott
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, paul o johnson
  • Re: momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: momentum, Jim Green
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: momentum, Jim Birdsong
  • Re: momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: momentum, Jim Green
  • Re: momentum, John Trammell
  • Re: momentum, Gordon Smith
  • Re: momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Momentum, Jim Green
  • Re: momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: momentum, Peter Schoch
  • Re: momentum, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: momentum, Clarence Bennett
  • Re: Momentum, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Momentum, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Momentum, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Momentum, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Momentum, Leigh Palmer
• momentum transfer, Michael Moloney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: momentum transfer, Richard Tarara
  • Re: momentum transfer, Doug Craigen
  • Re: momentum transfer, Richard Tarara
  • Re: momentum transfer, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum transfer, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum transfer, James W. Wheeler
  • Re: momentum transfer, Richard Tarara
  • Re: momentum transfer, Richard Tarara
  • Re: momentum transfer, Jim Green
  • Re: momentum transfer, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: momentum transfer, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum transfer, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: momentum transfer, Jim Green
• Re: Super Cold Beer!, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Super Cold Beer!, William Beaty
• References, James W. Wheeler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: References, Samuel Held
• Re: revolution! online REAL DATA from lab experiments, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: revolution! online REAL DATA from lab experiments, Ludwik Kowalski
• momentum and the importance of being scientific, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: momentum and the importance of being scientific, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: momentum and the importance of being scientific, paul o johnson
• Egg drop (was Re: momentum), David J. Hamilton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Egg drop (was Re: momentum), Michael Edmiston
• spinning disk-magnet experiments, William Beaty
• Re: curvature of buckets of water, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, William Beaty
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Gary Karshner
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, brian whatcott
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, James W. Wheeler
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Robert A Cohen
  • Curvature of Buckets of Water, Richard Hake
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: curvature of buckets of water, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Grade Prcedures and Management, J Carr
• math problem/freeways (fwd), Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: math problem/freeways (fwd), Leigh Palmer
  • Re: math problem/freeways (fwd), JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: math problem/freeways (fwd), Frederick Lemmerhirt
• Collisions (momentum), Henry Kuhlman
• Re: curvature of large buckets of water, John S. Denker
• Re: Turntable demos, Ron Ebert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Turntable demos, Leigh Palmer
• Midterm Question - Sort of, Doug Craigen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, brian whatcott
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Brian W. Rich
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, William Beaty
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, paul o johnson
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Samuel Held
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Samuel Held
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, James McLean
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Jim Green
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Jim Green
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, brian whatcott
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, brian whatcott
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Jim Green
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Sampere
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, paul o johnson
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, James McLean
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, brian whatcott
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, Jerome Epstein
  • Re: Midterm Question - Sort of, William Beaty
• Planet rotation, Jim Braunsdorf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Planet rotation, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Planet rotation, Samuel Held
  • Re: Planet rotation, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Planet rotation, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Planet rotation, Ron Ebert
  • Re: Planet rotation, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Planet rotation, David Bowman
  • Re: Planet rotation, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Planet rotation, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Planet rotation, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Planet rotation, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Tacoma Narrows Bridge Resonance?, Ron Ebert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tacoma Narrows Bridge Resonance?, Stan Dodds
• The importance of being scientific, Leigh Palmer
• Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., John Denker
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonic ..., JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Brass instruments, John Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Brass instruments, John Gastineau
  • Re: Brass instruments, John Denker
  • Re: Brass instruments, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Brass instruments, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Brass instruments, Jim Green
  • Re: Brass instruments, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Brass instruments, Timothy Folkerts
  • Re: Brass instruments, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Brass instruments, Mel Bartels
  • Re: Brass instruments, Jim Green
  • Re: Brass instruments, brian whatcott
  • Re: Brass instruments, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Brass instruments, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Brass instruments, Mel Bartels
  • Re: Brass instruments, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Brass instruments, Leigh Palmer
• Re: harmonics, anharmonics (was: Midterm Question), John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: harmonics, anharmonics (was: Midterm Question), JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: harmonics, anharmonics, John Denker
• FYI, Bob Sciamanda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FYI, Karl Trappe
• Wandering, Leigh Palmer
• traffic waves, William Beaty
• Open position, Bruce Callen
• wee bit o' Tesla, William Beaty
• Earth's Magnetic Field, Bob Yeend
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, KATHERINE TODD
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, KATHERINE TODD
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, brian whatcott
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Bob Yeend
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Carl C. Gaither
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, paul o johnson
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, brian whatcott
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, paul o johnson
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, paul o johnson
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, William Beaty
  • Re: Earth's Magnetic Field, brian whatcott
• Apology for duplicate (triplicate) posts, K. Lee Lerner
• Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, William Beaty
  • Re: What is understanding?, William Beaty
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, Cary Busby
  • Re: What is understanding?, Tim Burgess
  • Re: What is understanding?, Cary Busby
  • Re: What is understanding?, brian whatcott
  • Re: What is understanding?, Samuel Held
  • Re: What is understanding?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: What is understanding?, Tim Burgess
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, Samuel Held
  • Re: What is understanding?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: What is understanding?, Cliff Parker
  • Re: What is understanding?, brian whatcott
  • Re: What is understanding?, K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: What is understanding?, Uri Ganiel
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: What is understanding?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: What is understanding?, James W. Wheeler
  • Re: What is understanding?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: What is understanding?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: What is understanding?, Bob Sciamanda
• Outside Comments, Kenneth J. Morgan
• Re: What is understanding, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Table Cloth Physics?, Tim Burgess
• Logic statements (was RE: What is understanding?), Cary Busby
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Logic statements (was RE: What is understanding?), Tim Burgess
  • Re: Logic statements (was RE: What is understanding?), Gary Karshner
  • Re: Logic statements (was RE: What is understanding?), James McLean
  • Re: Logic statements (was RE: What is understanding?), JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Amusement Park Physics, J C
• Understanding, a tangential note, John Gastineau
• Course objectives for Intro. Physics for Engineers, Arjendu K. Pattanayak
• Terminology Confusion, Gordon Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Terminology Confusion, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Terminology Confusion, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Terminology Confusion, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Terminology Confusion, James Mclean
  • Re: Terminology Confusion, Daniel Schroeder
• PKAL's 10TH Anniversary, Warren Hein
• Exit tests, Jerry Lisantti
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Exit tests, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Exit tests, Gary P. Agin
  • Re: Exit tests, Gary Karshner
  • Re: Exit tests, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Exit tests, Warren Hein
  • Re: Exit tests, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Exit tests, Stan Dodds
  • Re: Exit tests, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Exit tests, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
  • Re: Exit tests, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: Exit tests, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Exit tests, Arnulfo Castellanos Moreno
• A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, John Denker
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, James McLean
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, John Denker
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, brian whatcott
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A paradox? Why not?, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• e-mailing tables (was A paradox? Why not?), Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: e-mailing tables (was A paradox? Why not?), Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: e-mailing tables (was A paradox? Why not?), Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: e-mailing tables (was A paradox? Why not?), L. R. Cartwright (Larry)
  • Re: e-mailing tables (was A paradox? Why not?), Stefan Jeglinski
• Magnetosphere question..., Gordon Smith
• Position Opening, Gary Karshner
• Off Topic: Three Chapters of Turing on Enigma, brian whatcott
• Complete the sequence problems (fwd), John Mallinckrodt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems (fwd), DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• Re: Complete the sequence problems, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems, John Mallinckrodt
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems, Stefan Jeglinski
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
  • Re: Complete the sequence problems, brian whatcott
• predicting rather than just reproducing data, JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Exit tests (assessment plans), Rick Tarara
• Re: Atomic Models - simulation, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Atomic Models - simulation, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Atomic Models - simulation, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
  • Re: Atomic Models - simulation, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Atomic Models - simulation, Inge H. A. Pettersen
  • Re: Atomic Models - simulation, brian whatcott
• [no subject], Alvin V. Flores
• Density of gas mixture, John Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, John Denker
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, Chuck Britton
  • Re: Density of gas mixture, William Beaty
• [no subject], brian whatcott
• Re: R: Re: A paradox? Why not?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • R: Re: A paradox? Why not?, Paolo Cavallo
• A "universal" computer language?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, Rick Tarara
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, John Trammell
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, James W. Wheeler
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, Mervin Koehlinger
  • Re: A "universal" computer language?, Rick Tarara
• "supershielding", William Beaty
• Re: hot air rising, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: hot air rising, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: hot air rising, John Denker
  • Re: hot air rising, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: hot air rising, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: hot air rising, John Denker
  • Re: hot air rising, Chuck Britton
  • Re: hot air rising, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Hot air rising, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: hot air rising, Jim Green
  • Re: hot air rising, brian whatcott
  • Re: Hot air rising, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: hot air rising, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Adiabatic cooling, Chuck Britton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Adiabatic cooling, John Denker
  • Re: Adiabatic cooling, John Cooper
• The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, William Beaty
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, brian whatcott
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, brian whatcott
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, William Beaty
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, paul o johnson
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, paul o johnson
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, William Beaty
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: The importance of being pedant, William Beaty
• Gases, vapors and the like, John Cooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gases, vapors and the like, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, brian whatcott
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, brian whatcott
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Leigh Palmer
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Doug Craigen
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Christopher Horton
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Gordon Smith
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Herschel Neumann
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, William Beaty
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment?, Samuel Held
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes theory o fthe field), Ludwik Kowalski
• The van der Waals equation of state, Leigh Palmer
• unsubscribe, Joe Scherrer
• Stranglets?, KATHERINE TODD
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes theory o f the field), Samuel Held
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes theory o f the field), Samuel Held
  • Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes theory o f the field), JACK L. URETSKY (C)1998; HEP DIVISION, ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB ARGONNE, IL 60439
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes press re leases and more), Samuel Held
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Short - error correction ), Samuel Held
• Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Experiment? (Long - includes theory o fthefield), Ludwik Kowalski
• A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, Robert A Cohen
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, paul o johnson
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, Rick Tarara
  • Re: A MISCONCEPTION ITEM, brian whatcott
• OLD LIST OF MISCONCEPTIONS, Ludwik Kowalski
• vapor versus gas, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: vapor versus gas, brian whatcott
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Michael Edmiston
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Gordon Smith
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Sampere
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Herb Schulz
  • Re: vapor versus gas, paul o johnson
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Norman Lohstreter
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Sampere
  • Re: vapor versus gas, William Beaty
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Sampere
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: vapor versus gas, paul o johnson
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: vapor versus gas, Leigh Palmer
• A quotation, Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A quotation, Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: A quotation, Spagna Jr., George
  • Re: A quotation, John Trammell
  • Re: A quotation, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • Re: A quotation, Herbert H Gottlieb
  • Re: A quotation, Greg Kifer
  • Re: A quotation, Raymond A. Rogoway
• Re: vapor versus gas ( cow = beef), Roger Haar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: vapor versus gas ( cow = beef), Clarence Bennett
• WINDS, was Hot air rising and automobile thermometers, Ludwik Kowalski
• What's New for Jul 23, 1999 Re: Dangerous Ion Colliding Expe, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• Re: Strangelets?, Rob Davies
• Re: Greenhouse Misconception, paul o johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Greenhouse Misconception, Rick Tarara
  • Re: Greenhouse Misconception, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: Greenhouse Misconception, brian whatcott
• test-delete, Miguel A. Santos
• a practical physics problem with pulleys, Leigh Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a practical physics problem with pulleys, Greg Puskar
  • Re: a practical physics problem with pulleys, Leigh Palmer
  • Re: a practical physics problem with pulleys, Tom Ford
  • Re: a practical physics problem with pulleys, Gordon Smith
  • Re: a practical physics problem with pulleys, Leigh Palmer
• Salt water, Robert A Cohen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Salt water, brian whatcott
  • Re: Salt water, David J. Hamilton
  • Re: Salt water, Gary Karshner
• In praise of misbehavior, DEVARAKONDA VENKATA NARAYANA SARMA
• A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Ludwik Kowalski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), brian whatcott
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Robert A Cohen
  • Re: A bawl in a rotating dish (was Hot air rising ...), Ludwik Kowalski
• misconceptions (physics of flight), John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), Rick Tarara
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), John S. Denker
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), Ludwik Kowalski
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), K. Lee Lerner
  • Re: misconceptions (physics of flight), David J. Hamilton
• Univ-High School Partnerships/AAPT Workshop, Jane Jackson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Univ-High School Partnerships/AAPT Workshop, Michael N. Monce
• July/Aug 99 PHYS-L technical posting, Daniel L. MacIsaac
• PHYS-L presentation at San Antonio, Daniel L. MacIsaac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PHYS-L presentation at San Antonio, Keith Tipton
  • Re: PHYS-L presentation at San Antonio, Rondo Jeffery
• teeny atoms absorb huge EM waves, William Beaty
• Re: U-HS partnerships, Jane Jackson
• leyden jar in your shower!, William Beaty
• web survey on science faculty/education faculty collaborations, Robert A Cohen
• Re: misconceptions, brian whatcott
• Misconceptions FAQ, Doug Craigen
• Long lines in Netscape, Ludwik Kowalski
• Circumventing Earnshaw's Theorem, William Beaty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Circumventing Earnshaw's Theorem, Bob Sciamanda