Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 10:22 AM 7/21/99 -0400, Robert A Cohen wrote:
Now that I know about the "source of heat" theory, I must say that I don't
have a good answer to this. The "close to magma" theory can be somewhat
addressed by measuring the temperature below ground (not in mines, mind
you). The "close to ground" theory can be somewhat addressed by measuring
the temperature on mountain tops, as you say. Neither totally convinces
the students of the fallacy of their theory (is Denver always colder than
New York City?) but they do get the students to question. I then
introduce another "theory", based upon mixing, and ask the students how
they might determine the "better" theory.
I'm glad your students are not convinced by the "source of heat" or
"mixing" theories because both of those miss the essential physical points,
namely:
a) Air tends to rise if it is hotter THAN THE SURROUNDING AIR (other
things like humidity being equal).
b) Air that goes up for any reason (including wind forced up the slope of
a mountain) will COOL ADIABATICALLY (to a good approximation) as it rises.