Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Hi Rick-below,
But I thought the comparison is between two moving cars, each with
speed V, and a moving car with speed 2V and a parked car.
Regards,
Jack
*******************************************************************
To simplify the discussion (somewhat) let's change the comparison to a
collision between two moving cars and one moving car and one parked car.
Now certainly a collision with the parked car at speed v is less serious
than a head-on with both cars travelling at v. In Michael's analysis
the assumption of equal times to come to rest is, I believe, the problem.move
In the head-on, t will be smaller (assuming the center of mass will not
once the cars make contact) than in the collision with the parked car(even
if that car doesn't move).
Rick
*******************************************************
"I scored the next great triumph for science myself,
to wit, how the milk gets into the cow. Both of us
had marveled over that mystery a long time. We had
followed the cows around for years - that is, in the
daytime - but had never caught them drinking fluid of
that color."
Mark Twain, Extract from Eve's
Autobiography