Phys-L List Archive (by Date) of February, 1998

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Search Archives

Explaining explain, 02/01/1998 09:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/01/1998 13:40, Seckinger, Jennifer
discussing science books for children, 02/01/1998 14:47, William Beaty
RE: Explaining explain, 02/01/1998 17:49, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
RE: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/01/1998 19:05, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: sun's spectrum - riposte, 02/01/1998 19:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/01/1998 20:16, VERNON DEWEES
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/01/1998 20:45, Leigh Palmer
Fw: Sun rotation project, 02/01/1998 21:07, Bob Sciamanda
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/01/1998 21:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Explaining explain, 02/01/1998 21:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Solar power, 02/01/1998 23:18, Marlyn Jakub
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 02:02, William J. Larson
Re: Solar power, 02/02/1998 04:15, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Explaining explain, 02/02/1998 07:42, Mark Sylvester
RE: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 08:09, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Breaking sticks or spaghetti, 02/02/1998 08:57, Sam Sampere
Re: Breaking sticks or spaghetti, 02/02/1998 09:35, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Solar power, 02/02/1998 09:50, Mark Shapiro
RE: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 10:03, Quist, Oren Phys
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 10:41, James W. Wheeler
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 10:48, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
RE: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 11:31, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 12:14, James S. Marsh
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 12:26, WALKIEWICZ
Re: Boring labs, 02/02/1998 14:03, Herbert H. Gottlieb
RE: IMAGINARY NUMBERS -Reply, 02/02/1998 14:14, RONDO JEFFERY
Viruses, 02/02/1998 14:30, Jim Green
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/02/1998 15:26, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 15:33, kyle forinash
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 15:37, Allen Miller
Re: nuclear hazards was solar energy, 02/02/1998 16:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/02/1998 16:21, Frank Barish
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/02/1998 16:35, Jerry Hester
Re: Viruses, 02/02/1998 16:42, James G. Pengra
Re: microwave power settings, 02/02/1998 16:51, SCIAMANDA
Re: Viruses, 02/02/1998 17:00, Larry Smith
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/02/1998 17:14, SCIAMANDA
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/02/1998 17:23, Norman Lohstreter
Friction, 02/02/1998 17:47, Lowell Herr
Re: Friction, 02/02/1998 18:37, Joseph Bellina
nuclear hazards, was solar energy, 02/02/1998 19:06, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Viruses, 02/02/1998 19:57, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Friction, 02/02/1998 20:57, Tom McCarthy
Re: Friction, 02/02/1998 21:00, Lowell Herr
Re: Friction, 02/02/1998 21:05, Lowell Herr
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/02/1998 21:53, Scott johnston
Imaginary and complex numbers, 02/02/1998 23:06, lhodges
Re: Friction, 02/02/1998 23:13, brian whatcott
Re: Friction, 02/03/1998 00:05, Lowell Herr
Re: IMAGINARY NUMBERS, 02/03/1998 04:13, William J. Larson
Re: Friction, 02/03/1998 09:33, Joseph Bellina
Re: Viruses, 02/03/1998 09:51, Paul Camp
Nuclear waste, 02/03/1998 12:02, JOHN CAMERON
Re: Viruses, 02/03/1998 12:22, Richard W. Tarara
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/03/1998 12:35, David Dockstader
Re: sun's spectrum, 02/03/1998 13:35, David Dockstader
Re: sun's spectrum, 02/03/1998 13:51, David Dockstader
Re: nuclear hazards, 02/03/1998 15:10, Frank Barish
Re: Viruses, 02/03/1998 15:28, Jim Green
Re: sun's spectrum, 02/03/1998 20:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: sun's spectrum, 02/03/1998 20:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: sun's spectrum (fwd), 02/04/1998 04:11, Roger Freedman
Re: sun's spectrum (fwd), 02/04/1998 13:24, fredb
Cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 14:57, Maurice Barnhill
Re: sun's spectrum (fwd), 02/04/1998 15:20, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
a suggestion, 02/04/1998 16:02, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 16:21, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: a suggestion, 02/04/1998 16:25, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: what are the labs for?, 02/04/1998 16:41, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 17:02, Mark Shapiro
A SUGGESTION, 02/04/1998 17:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Viruses, 02/04/1998 17:45, Paul Camp
Re: Cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 19:36, brian whatcott
Re: Viruses, 02/04/1998 20:26, James Mclean
Re: Cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 21:31, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Viruses, 02/04/1998 22:14, Rick Tarara
Re: cloud chamber mystery, 02/04/1998 22:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Viruses, 02/05/1998 10:49, Carmen K. Shepard
Re: Viruses, 02/05/1998 11:22, Paul Camp
Potential Energy = "U"?, 02/05/1998 17:18, kifer/belk
Re: sun's spectrum (fwd), 02/05/1998 18:06, fredb
Re: Potential Energy = "U"?, 02/06/1998 04:25, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Potential Energy = "U"?, 02/06/1998 09:56, DSCHROEDER
Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 10:23, William Beaty
Van de Graaf, 02/06/1998 10:36, Jason
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 10:48, Richard W. Tarara
CyclePad educational software, 02/06/1998 11:44, Julie Baher
Re: Explaining explain, 02/06/1998 12:00, SCIAMANDA
Re: Van de Graaf, 02/06/1998 12:08, Miguel A. Santos
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 12:26, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 12:33, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Explaining explain, 02/06/1998 12:52, Leigh Palmer
Re: Explaining explain -Reply, 02/06/1998 12:59, Sr. Margaret Clarke
Re: Explaining explain, 02/06/1998 13:04, Bruce Callen
Re: what are the labs for?, 02/06/1998 13:36, kifer/belk
Re: Van de Graaf, 02/06/1998 13:44, kifer/belk
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 14:18, SCIAMANDA
Re: Explaining explain -Reply, 02/06/1998 15:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
The principle of principles, 02/06/1998 15:41, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Van de Graaf, 02/06/1998 17:31, Gary Karshner
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 18:55, Maurice Barnhill
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 20:09, William Beaty
Re: Van de Graaf, 02/06/1998 20:38, Donald E. Simanek
Potential Energy = "U"?, 02/06/1998 22:24, William J. Larson
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/06/1998 22:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: light slows down in glass, 02/06/1998 23:55, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Cloud chamber mystery, 02/07/1998 00:09, brian whatcott
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/07/1998 00:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: light is slowing down, 02/07/1998 09:10, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: light is slowing down, 02/07/1998 09:35, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/07/1998 09:45, Donald E. Simanek
Re: light is slowing down, 02/07/1998 10:34, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: reflection and refraction, 02/07/1998 10:49, Seckinger, Jennifer
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/07/1998 12:32, David Bowman
Re: light slows down in glass, 02/07/1998 22:20, Bob Sciamanda
How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/07/1998 23:23, GEORGE PANAGIOTAKOPOULOS
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/08/1998 02:27, William Beaty
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/08/1998 08:32, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 08:34, kifer/belk
"Greenhouse" effect. Was: light is slowing down, 02/08/1998 09:46, Donald E. Simanek
Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 10:30, Donald E. Simanek
Re: How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/08/1998 12:41, brian whatcott
Light slows down in glass?, 02/08/1998 13:06, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 13:30, Rick Tarara
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 14:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 14:44, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 14:54, Rick Tarara
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 14:58, Donald E. Simanek
greenhouse misconception, 02/08/1998 15:56, William Beaty
Re: How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/08/1998 16:14, William Beaty
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 16:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: greenhouse misconception, 02/08/1998 16:27, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Mars Global Surveyor, 02/08/1998 17:04, Lowell Herr
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 17:31, Raacc
Re: greenhouse misconception, 02/08/1998 17:34, Rick Tarara
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/08/1998 18:26, brian whatcott
Re: How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/08/1998 21:01, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/08/1998 21:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/09/1998 04:05, Roger Freedman
Posting Problems, 02/09/1998 06:24, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: How to dissipate charges from aeroplanes?, 02/09/1998 06:48, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: understand understanding, 02/09/1998 07:55, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: "Greenhouse" effect. Was: light is slowing down, 02/09/1998 08:52, Roger Pruitt
Re: greenhouse misconception, 02/09/1998 08:58, Roger Pruitt
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 09:02, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 09:42, Chuck Britton
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 09:56, Chuck Britton
Re: Van de Graaf, 02/09/1998 10:27, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 11:13, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Posting Problems, 02/09/1998 15:00, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 16:38, Raacc
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 17:30, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Simple expanations. was what are the labs for, 02/09/1998 19:37, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Simple expanations. was what are the labs for, 02/09/1998 19:49, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 20:26, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/09/1998 20:49, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
RE: The principle of principles, 02/09/1998 21:09, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: understand understanding, 02/09/1998 23:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: understand understanding, 02/10/1998 01:15, Leigh Palmer
Re: Radioactive SparkPlugs, 02/10/1998 04:16, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: Radioactive SparkPlugs, 02/10/1998 05:41, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Simple expanations. was what are the labs for, 02/10/1998 10:40, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/10/1998 10:46, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 10:51, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Standing waves, 02/10/1998 11:41, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Light slows down in glass?, 02/10/1998 12:09, David Dockstader
Re: Radioactive SparkPlugs, 02/10/1998 12:44, brian whatcott
H7R Fundamentals of Physics Solutions, 02/10/1998 14:34, Ken Fox
Re:Workshop on medical instrumentation, 02/10/1998 15:49, JOHN CAMERON
Crumple zones, 02/10/1998 15:55, scott johnston
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 16:02, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 16:35, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/10/1998 16:52, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Radioactive SparkPlugs, 02/10/1998 18:01, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 18:20, Ken Fox
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 18:27, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 18:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 19:26, Rick Tarara
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 19:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 20:13, Donald E. Simanek
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 20:16, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 20:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 21:26, Donald E. Simanek
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/10/1998 22:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/11/1998 01:39, Frank Barish
Right, wrong, and switching opinions, 02/11/1998 03:38, William Beaty
Re: Right, wrong, and switching oponions, 02/11/1998 08:47, David Bowman
A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 10:34, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Explanation of airfoils [was: Right, wrong, and switching opinions], 02/11/1998 10:41, John Trammell
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/11/1998 10:50, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/11/1998 11:07, DMATHIE
Re: Explanation of airfoils [was: Right, wrong, and switching, 02/11/1998 11:51, Chuck Britton
Re: Right, wrong, and switching opinions, 02/11/1998 11:59, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Crumple zones, 02/11/1998 12:03, Paul Camp
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 12:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/11/1998 12:16, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/11/1998 12:36, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: No. 5 in A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 13:33, Herbert H. Gottlieb
re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 13:45, John Trammell
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 13:49, Paul Camp
Re: Right, wrong, and switching opinions, 02/11/1998 13:49, brian whatcott
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 02/11/1998 14:01, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 02/11/1998 14:04, Karl Trappe
Re: about the LIST OF TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/11/1998 15:01, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 02/11/1998 15:40, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Right, wrong, and switching opinions, 02/11/1998 17:04, William Beaty
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/11/1998 17:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/11/1998 17:20, David Dockstader
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 17:49, William Beaty
Re: Explanation of airfoils, 02/11/1998 19:33, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 20:07, Tom McCarthy
Re: Explanation of airfoils, 02/11/1998 20:07, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 20:11, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/11/1998 21:16, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 21:31, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 22:16, Hugh Haskell
DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS., 02/11/1998 22:27, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/11/1998 22:54, Ken Fox
REPLY TO ALL (about textbook misconceptions), 02/11/1998 23:09, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 23:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/11/1998 23:59, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/12/1998 01:30, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/12/1998 02:29, William Beaty
Re: Misconceptions, 02/12/1998 03:01, Allen Shotwell
REPLY TO ALL. text misconceptions, 02/12/1998 03:48, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconceptions, 02/12/1998 08:54, GARY HEMMINGER
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/12/1998 09:10, Roger Pruitt
DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 09:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Medical Physics Workshop - correction to URL, 02/12/1998 09:38, JOHN CAMERON
RE: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 09:43, Dennis Krause
REPLY TO ALL, text misconceptions, 02/12/1998 09:43, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
RE: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 10:21, Tim Sullivan x5830
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/12/1998 10:45, Donald E. Simanek
Misconceptions, 02/12/1998 10:50, Richard W. Tarara
Simulation software, 02/12/1998 11:03, Paolo Cavallo
Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/12/1998 11:09, Rauber, Joel Phys
RE: REPLY TO ALL, text misconceptions, 02/12/1998 11:30, John Trammell
RE: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 11:30, Van E. Neie
Re: DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 11:39, Ken Caviness
Re: DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 11:54, Herbert H. Gottlieb
REPLY TO ALL--Misconceptions:Airfoil, 02/12/1998 11:57, Richard W. Tarara
Re: about the LIST OF TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 12:16, Ian Macdonald
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/12/1998 12:22, SCIAMANDA
Re: REPLY TO ALL (about textbook misconceptions), 02/12/1998 12:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 12:55, Richard W. Tarara
Re: DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 12:59, Richard W. Tarara
Re: REPLY TO ALL, text misconceptions, 02/12/1998 13:01, brian whatcott
Re: about the LIST OF TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 13:04, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Re: Airfoil, 02/12/1998 13:43, brian whatcott
Common misconception, 02/12/1998 13:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/12/1998 13:56, Donald E. Simanek
Re: understand understanding, simple explanations, etc., 02/12/1998 14:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Simple explanations. Was: what are the labs for?, 02/12/1998 14:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 14:23, Mark Shapiro
Re: Misconceptions, 02/12/1998 14:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/12/1998 14:46, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 14:54, Roger Pruitt
Re: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 15:43, DSCHROEDER
looking for new ideas, 02/12/1998 16:17, Mark Sylvester
Re: Common misconception, 02/12/1998 16:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: Common misconception, 02/12/1998 17:01, Leigh Palmer
RE: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 17:05, Jim Green
The Bill, 02/12/1998 17:05, Jim Green
Apparent weight, 02/12/1998 17:12, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
DO NOT REPLY. TEXT MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 17:20, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: looking for new ideas, 02/12/1998 19:20, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Leaving Phys-l?, 02/12/1998 20:33, Seckinger, Jennifer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/12/1998 21:19, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Leaving Phys-l?, 02/12/1998 21:24, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Apparent weight, 02/12/1998 21:26, Leigh Palmer
RE: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/12/1998 22:01, Donald E. Simanek
Re: looking for new ideas, 02/12/1998 22:05, brian whatcott
Re: Apparent weight, 02/12/1998 22:08, Rick Tarara
Re: DO NOT REPLY. TEXTBOOK MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/12/1998 22:54, William Beaty
Re: REPLY TO ALL--Misconceptions:Airfoil, 02/12/1998 23:44, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/12/1998 23:52, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 01:06, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/13/1998 01:26, William Beaty
Re: REPLY TO ALL--Misconceptions:Airfoil, 02/13/1998 01:50, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 02:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 02:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 02:54, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 03:16, William Beaty
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/13/1998 06:23, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: apparent weight, 02/13/1998 06:50, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: apparent weight, 02/13/1998 07:03, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/13/1998 07:59, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 08:02, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 09:03, Roger Pruitt
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 09:05, Richard W. Tarara
Re: REPLY TO ALL--Misconceptions:Airfoil, 02/13/1998 09:15, Roger Pruitt
Re: Comments: txtbk misconceptions, 02/13/1998 09:56, Mark Shapiro
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 10:05, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 10:30, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 11:10, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 11:32, William Beaty
Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 11:41, Ken Fox
Ceiling fan design, 02/13/1998 11:57, Neil D. Adams
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 12:49, Leigh Palmer
magnetic poles, 02/13/1998 12:52, Mark Sylvester
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 12:52, Mark Sylvester
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 13:02, brian whatcott
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 13:20, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 13:38, Richard W. Tarara
Magnetic field lines like this?, 02/13/1998 13:49, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Ceiling fan design, 02/13/1998 14:06, Paul Camp
Re: Uncl: course/instructor evaluations, 02/13/1998 14:07, mdittman
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 14:23, SCIAMANDA
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 15:12, Roger Pruitt
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 15:37, John Gastineau
Re: magnetic poles, 02/13/1998 15:56, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 16:37, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 16:39, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 17:07, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/13/1998 21:35, Donald E. Simanek
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/13/1998 22:22, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Apparent weight, 02/13/1998 23:40, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 00:39, William J. Larson
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/14/1998 01:25, Ken Fox
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 01:42, brian whatcott
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/14/1998 04:01, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 04:16, William J. Larson
magnetic poles, 02/14/1998 04:16, William J. Larson
Re: Ceiling fan design, 02/14/1998 04:31, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 07:52, Lawrence L'Hote
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 08:03, William J. Larson
Re: apparent weight, 02/14/1998 08:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: magnetic lines like this?, 02/14/1998 09:06, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 10:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: apparent weight, 02/14/1998 10:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/14/1998 10:52, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 11:14, brian whatcott
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 12:58, Roger Pruitt
solar monopole, 02/14/1998 13:15, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/14/1998 13:28, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 14:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 14:19, Raacc
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 14:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 15:09, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/14/1998 15:13, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 15:30, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: REPLY TO ALL--Misconceptions:Airfoil, 02/14/1998 15:41, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 15:49, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/14/1998 15:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/14/1998 16:14, William Beaty
potential difference reduced by dielectrics, 02/14/1998 16:20, Michael Moloney
Re: magnetic poles, 02/14/1998 17:47, Mark Sylvester
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 18:29, Raacc
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 19:52, Leigh Palmer
What's to replace "charged?", 02/14/1998 19:59, William Beaty
Misconceptions--a comment, 02/14/1998 20:35, Rick Tarara
Re: Apparent weight, 02/14/1998 21:30, Raacc
"Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/14/1998 22:19, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/14/1998 23:35, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Misconceptions--a comment, 02/14/1998 23:49, Raacc
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 00:27, Raacc
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/15/1998 00:43, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/15/1998 01:35, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 01:39, John Mallinckrodt
Re: potential difference reduced by dielectrics, 02/15/1998 07:13, Miguel A. Santos
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/15/1998 09:37, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 10:18, Rick Tarara
Re: apparent force, 02/15/1998 10:37, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
DO NOT REPLY, TEXT MISCONCEPTIONS, 02/15/1998 10:43, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/15/1998 11:02, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Misconceptions--a comment, 02/15/1998 11:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 11:50, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 11:50, John Mallinckrodt
The thread of threads, 02/15/1998 12:10, Mark Sylvester
Re: magnetic poles, 02/15/1998 12:10, Mark Sylvester
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 12:44, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 13:02, Roger Pruitt
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 13:27, David Bowman
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 13:29, Roger Pruitt
The conceptual change process (long), 02/15/1998 13:38, William Beaty
Re: potential difference reduced by dielectrics, 02/15/1998 13:47, Michael Moloney
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 14:42, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 15:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: The conceptual change process (long), 02/15/1998 15:30, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 15:42, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: magnetic poles, 02/15/1998 15:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/15/1998 15:52, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Butchered ASCII messages, 02/15/1998 16:02, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: magnetic poles, 02/15/1998 16:04, Chuck Britton
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/15/1998 16:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: apparent force, 02/15/1998 16:10, Rick Tarara
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 16:24, Rick Tarara
Re: Butchered ASCII messages, 02/15/1998 16:48, Tim Folkerts
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/15/1998 17:09, Herb Schulz
Re: Butchered ASCII messages, 02/15/1998 17:31, Delphi High School
Some More Problems, 02/15/1998 17:35, Herb Schulz
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 17:38, Herb Schulz
Re: Butchered ASCII messages, 02/15/1998 18:23, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 19:00, Leigh Palmer
RE: The thread of threads, 02/15/1998 19:08, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 19:13, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Some More Problems, 02/15/1998 19:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: magnetic poles, 02/15/1998 19:26, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/15/1998 19:36, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/15/1998 20:16, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/15/1998 20:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Some More Problems, 02/15/1998 20:20, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Some More Problems, 02/15/1998 20:43, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: magnetic field like this?, 02/15/1998 20:59, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Sunburn from sitting in car, 02/15/1998 21:44, Pang-Chieh Chou
misconception regarding capacitors?, 02/15/1998 21:45, Leigh Palmer
Misconception by omission, 02/15/1998 22:25, Bob Sciamanda
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/15/1998 22:48, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Apparent weight, 02/15/1998 22:56, David Bowman
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/15/1998 23:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/16/1998 00:01, David Bowman
Re: Misconception by omission, 02/16/1998 00:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 00:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Misconception by omission, 02/16/1998 00:52, Mark Shapiro
weightless and north seeking, 02/16/1998 01:54, Richard H. Hodson
apparent weight, 02/16/1998 02:25, Richard H. Hodson
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 02:41, William J. Larson
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 02:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 04:52, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: solar monopole, 02/16/1998 04:58, Margaret Mazzolini
Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 06:37, Steven T. Ratliff
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 08:17, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 09:08, Raacc
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 09:11, Eugene P. Mosca
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 09:27, Herb Schulz
Re: Some More Problems, 02/16/1998 09:28, Herb Schulz
Re: misconception regarding capacitors?, 02/16/1998 09:47, Chuck Britton
more on butchered email, 02/16/1998 09:56, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 10:03, Leigh Palmer
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 10:29, Chuck Britton
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 10:30, Leigh Palmer
Test (Delete), 02/16/1998 10:57, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 11:34, Lowell Herr
Re: Ceiling fan design, 02/16/1998 12:35, fredb
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 12:38, David Bowman
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/16/1998 12:53, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 13:15, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 13:19, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 13:58, Herb Schulz
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 14:01, Joseph Bellina
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 14:02, brian whatcott
Re: misconception regarding capacitors?, 02/16/1998 14:04, Mark Sylvester
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 14:04, Mark Sylvester
Re: magnetic poles, 02/16/1998 14:04, Mark Sylvester
Re: misconception bu omission, 02/16/1998 14:06, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 14:07, Gary Karshner
Re: mmF for Capacitors, 02/16/1998 14:16, Vern Lindberg
Frames of Reference, 02/16/1998 14:20, Lowell Herr
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 14:28, Roger Pruitt
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 14:48, Clarence Bennett
Re: Sunburn from sitting in car, 02/16/1998 14:53, Norman Lohstreter
Re: potential difference reduced by dielectrics, 02/16/1998 15:49, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 16:14, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Some More Problems, 02/16/1998 16:46, Jim Riley
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 18:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 19:08, Leigh Palmer
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/16/1998 19:21, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/16/1998 20:26, James W. Wheeler
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/16/1998 20:30, James W. Wheeler
Re: capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 20:34, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 20:37, Dave Cruz @PEED (PTL!!!)
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/16/1998 21:04, Herb Schulz
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/16/1998 21:30, Robert Curtis
Circuit boards for teachers and schools, 02/16/1998 22:04, Herbert H. Gottlieb
The exponential RC discharge opportunity, 02/16/1998 22:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: magnetic field like this?, 02/16/1998 22:44, William Beaty
Re: nice units, 02/16/1998 22:47, Allen Shotwell
Re: Sunburn from sitting in car, 02/16/1998 23:14, William Beaty
nice units, 02/16/1998 23:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Apparent weight, 02/16/1998 23:26, A. R. Marlow
Re: The exponential RC discharge opportunity, 02/16/1998 23:40, Leigh Palmer
Equivalence Principle, 02/16/1998 23:51, A. R. Marlow
Newton's Law III, 02/17/1998 00:17, A. R. Marlow
Re: apparent weight, 02/17/1998 01:21, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Capacitors store atomic energy! ;), 02/17/1998 01:47, William Beaty
Re: The conceptual change process (long), 02/17/1998 03:10, William Beaty
Solar eclipse, 02/17/1998 08:46, John C. Park
Re: The conceptual change process, 02/17/1998 09:40, David Bowman
Re: The conceptual change process (long), 02/17/1998 10:05, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/17/1998 10:31, David Bowman
RE: Capacitors store atomic energy! ;), 02/17/1998 10:33, Rauber, Joel Phys
RE: Equivalence Principle, 02/17/1998 10:42, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: apparent weight, 02/17/1998 10:55, William Beaty
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/17/1998 11:01, William Beaty
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/17/1998 11:04, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/17/1998 11:06, William Beaty
Re: A list of textbook misconceptions, 02/17/1998 11:11, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/17/1998 11:37, Raacc
What two words . . . ?, 02/17/1998 11:48, SCIAMANDA
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/17/1998 13:01, Alex. F. Burr
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/17/1998 13:13, Alex. F. Burr
Re: The conceptual change process (long), 02/17/1998 13:32, Alex. F. Burr
RC discharge behavior, 02/17/1998 14:08, SCIAMANDA
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/17/1998 14:12, Karl Trappe
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/17/1998 14:16, Alex. F. Burr
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/17/1998 14:26, William J. Larson
Re: Capacitor Misconceptions, 02/17/1998 15:56, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: The conceptual change process (long), 02/17/1998 19:20, Bob Sciamanda
RE: The exponential RC discharge opportunity, 02/17/1998 21:12, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: The conceptual change process, 02/17/1998 21:46, William Beaty
Test Posts getting lost?, 02/17/1998 22:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Sunburn from sitting in car, 02/18/1998 00:33, brian whatcott
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 06:25, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 08:06, John Mallinckrodt
Data collection hardware, 02/18/1998 09:33, kyle forinash
sequential numbering, 02/18/1998 10:09, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: apparent weight, 02/18/1998 10:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 11:28, Chuck Britton
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/18/1998 11:52, BRIGGSP
Re: Capacitor Charged, Right term, 02/18/1998 11:53, David Bowman
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/18/1998 11:55, Vern Lindberg
Re: Test Posts getting lost?, 02/18/1998 11:55, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Capacitor Misconceptions, 02/18/1998 11:59, Richard W. Tarara
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 12:11, Mark Shapiro
Re: The exponential RC discharge opportunity, 02/18/1998 12:26, SCIAMANDA
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 12:40, Raacc
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/18/1998 12:47, Leigh Palmer
E-Motor, 02/18/1998 12:50, Arturo Pascalin
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/18/1998 12:58, Leigh Palmer
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 13:12, brian whatcott
Re: Data collection hardware, 02/18/1998 13:18, Michael Moloney
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/18/1998 13:21, brian whatcott
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 13:29, Tim Folkerts
Re: sequential numbering, 02/18/1998 15:04, Richard Grandy
Skin the cat, 02/18/1998 15:12, Ken Fox
conceptual change list, 02/18/1998 15:13, William Beaty
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/18/1998 15:15, Karl Trappe
Re: apparent weight, 02/18/1998 15:25, Herb Schulz
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 15:31, jim mcconville
Re: Capacitor Misconceptions, 02/18/1998 15:42, William Beaty
Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 15:42, A. R. Marlow
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 16:00, William Beaty
Re: Solar eclipse, 02/18/1998 16:09, John Mallinckrodt
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/18/1998 16:23, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 16:28, SCIAMANDA
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 16:39, Ken Caviness
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 16:48, Ken Caviness
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 17:03, A. R. Marlow
Re: sequential numbering, 02/18/1998 17:04, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: RC discharge behavior, 02/18/1998 17:16, Alex. F. Burr
Re: E-Motor, 02/18/1998 17:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/18/1998 17:20, Chuck Britton
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 17:27, Donald E. Simanek
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 17:29, Donald E. Simanek
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 18:05, Mark Shapiro
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 18:22, Bob Blumenthal
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 19:03, Lawrence L'Hote
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 19:04, brian whatcott
Throw the ball to yourself, 02/18/1998 19:33, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 19:48, Raacc
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 20:48, William Beaty
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 20:54, William Beaty
Re: Solar eclipse (not), 02/18/1998 21:03, Sam Sampere
Re: Apparent weight, 02/18/1998 21:32, A. R. Marlow
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/18/1998 21:42, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 21:46, Mark Shapiro
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 21:53, Mark Shapiro
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/18/1998 23:09, brian whatcott
Re: apparent weight, 02/18/1998 23:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Frames of Reference, 02/18/1998 23:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: A list of textbook miscon: spatial coherence, 02/18/1998 23:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/18/1998 23:45, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 00:06, Leigh Palmer
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 04:40, William J. Larson
Re: Solar eclipse (not), 02/19/1998 05:54, Margaret Mazzolini
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 07:37, brian whatcott
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 07:57, Donald E. Simanek
data collection, 02/19/1998 08:02, George Marrash
Re: Various phases of ice, 02/19/1998 08:03, Mojca Cepic
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 08:10, Donald E. Simanek
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 08:35, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 08:53, Tim Folkerts
more on capacitors, 02/19/1998 09:56, Mark Shapiro
Re: The conceptual change process, 02/19/1998 10:20, David Bowman
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 10:25, David Bowman
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 10:30, Rauber, Joel Phys
RE: India conference, 02/19/1998 10:31, Teresa Hein
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 10:39, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 10:50, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/19/1998 11:20, Larry Smith
Re: apparent weight--Pedagogy, 02/19/1998 11:22, Richard W. Tarara
Re: Data collection hardware, 02/19/1998 11:30, Ken Fox
Microgravity and G-jitter, 02/19/1998 11:57, John Mallinckrodt
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 11:59, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: apparent weight--Pedagogy, 02/19/1998 12:10, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 13:30, Donald E. Simanek
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 13:41, A. R. Marlow
Re: apparent weight--Pedagogy, 02/19/1998 14:00, Leigh Palmer
Explaining, 02/19/1998 14:36, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 15:43, David Bowman
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 16:09, A. R. Marlow
Re: Explaining, 02/19/1998 16:09, Raacc
Outstanding Physics Student Certificates, 02/19/1998 16:10, Warren Hein
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 16:28, Clarence Bennett
Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 16:36, Joseph Bellina
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 16:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 16:59, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/19/1998 17:04, A. R. Marlow
New chime, 02/19/1998 17:08, Leigh Palmer
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 17:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Explaining, 02/19/1998 17:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 17:43, Leigh Palmer
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/19/1998 17:44, John Mallinckrodt
Re: New chime, 02/19/1998 17:46, Leigh Palmer
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 18:21, Mark Shapiro
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 19:10, brian whatcott
Re: Explaining, 02/19/1998 19:29, Raacc
correcting misconceptions - ice skating, 02/19/1998 19:38, Larry Smith
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 20:07, Joseph Bellina
Re: CHARGED CAPACITOR TERM, 02/19/1998 20:51, William Beaty
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/19/1998 20:59, A. R. Marlow
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 21:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: Explaining, 02/19/1998 21:07, Leigh Palmer
Re: apparent weight, 02/19/1998 21:14, A. R. Marlow
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/19/1998 21:14, William Beaty
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/19/1998 21:31, brian whatcott
Re: more on capacitors, 02/19/1998 21:48, William Beaty
Re: Explaining, 02/19/1998 21:53, Bob Sciamanda
what IS a capacitor anyhow?, 02/20/1998 01:57, William Beaty
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 02:09, William Beaty
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 02:22, William Beaty
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 02:34, William Beaty
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 07:12, Joseph Bellina
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 07:41, Raacc
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 08:00, brian whatcott
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 08:13, Raacc
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/20/1998 08:46, David Bowman
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 08:47, Donald E. Simanek
sunburn, 02/20/1998 09:14, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/20/1998 09:21, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 10:09, DSCHROEDER
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 10:31, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 10:37, Leigh Palmer
Circular orbits, and other stuff, 02/20/1998 10:39, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 10:54, Joseph Bellina
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 11:01, David Bowman
Re: India conference, 02/20/1998 11:05, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 11:05, David Bowman
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 11:26, Gary Karshner
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 11:34, DSCHROEDER
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 11:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 11:57, SCIAMANDA
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 12:03, James W. Wheeler
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 12:10, David Bowman
Re: what IS a capacitor anyhow, 02/20/1998 12:15, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 12:32, SCIAMANDA
Re: Circular orbits, and other stuff, 02/20/1998 12:38, A. R. Marlow
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 13:10, brian whatcott
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 13:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 13:40, Leigh Palmer
Re: Circular orbits, and other stuff, 02/20/1998 13:44, Leigh Palmer
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 13:55, Leigh Palmer
RE: India conference, 02/20/1998 14:05, Teresa Hein
Re: "Charged" capacitor mis-terminology, 02/20/1998 14:20, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 14:26, John Gastineau
Re: circular orbits and other stuff, 02/20/1998 14:36, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
direction of Delbrueck scattering (was curvature of space), 02/20/1998 14:40, DSCHROEDER
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/20/1998 14:43, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 14:46, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 14:48, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 14:51, Raacc
Re: Circular orbits, and other stuff, 02/20/1998 16:04, Chuck Britton
SI units, 02/20/1998 16:30, Chuck Britton
Scotch tape, was Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 16:35, John Gastineau
Re: Scotch tape, was Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 16:35, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
transfer of angular momentum during protostar collapse?, 02/20/1998 16:38, George Spagna
Needed: Summer Opportunity for High School Student, 02/20/1998 16:54, Warren Hein
Re: Circular orbits, and other stuff, 02/20/1998 17:34, Gary Karshner
displacement current, 02/20/1998 17:45, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/20/1998 18:35, Mark Sylvester
Re: Apparent weight, 02/20/1998 18:35, Mark Sylvester
suggestion, 02/20/1998 18:35, Mark Sylvester
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 19:12, Leigh Palmer
Re: Capacitor terminology, 02/20/1998 19:13, William Beaty
Re: direction of Delbrueck scattering (was curvature of space), 02/20/1998 19:16, Leigh Palmer
Universal expansion or local contraction?, 02/20/1998 19:18, Raacc
Re: Various phases of ice, 02/20/1998 19:48, brian whatcott
Re: Scotch tape, was Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 19:56, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent weight, 02/20/1998 20:49, A. R. Marlow
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/20/1998 21:40, brian whatcott
Re: Explaining, 02/20/1998 23:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: What two words . . . ?, 02/21/1998 00:08, James Mclean
Centrifugal Force, 02/21/1998 00:20, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 00:32, David Bowman
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 01:11, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 01:31, A. R. Marlow
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/21/1998 02:24, Leigh Palmer
Re: Centrifugal Force, 02/21/1998 02:50, David Bowman
Re: Various phases of ice, 02/21/1998 09:06, J Kiefer
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/21/1998 10:38, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Centrifugal Force, 02/21/1998 11:55, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Centrifugal Force, 02/21/1998 12:48, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 14:55, David Bowman
Forces??, 02/21/1998 14:57, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 15:11, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Apparent weight, 02/21/1998 16:54, A. R. Marlow
Re: displacement current, 02/21/1998 17:30, Mark Shapiro
Re: Centrifugal Force, 02/21/1998 19:01, David Bowman
Re: apparent weight, 02/21/1998 20:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: displacement current, 02/21/1998 20:16, John Mallinckrodt
Re: displacement current, 02/21/1998 20:18, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: apparent weight, 02/21/1998 20:43, William Beaty
Re: displacement current, 02/21/1998 22:14, Mark Shapiro
Re: displacement current, 02/21/1998 22:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 00:52, William Beaty
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 09:30, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 09:34, brian whatcott
ellipse --> circle ?, 02/22/1998 10:03, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 11:34, Leigh Palmer
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 12:29, John Gastineau
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/22/1998 13:21, Mark Sylvester
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 14:24, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
RE: ellipse --> circle ?, 02/22/1998 14:33, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Equivalence Principle, 02/22/1998 14:58, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 15:27, David Bowman
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 15:33, Tim Folkerts
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 16:07, William Beaty
Re: ABOUT OUR LIST, 02/22/1998 17:07, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: DO NOT REPLY, 02/22/1998 17:10, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Scotch tape, "Sticky Electrostatics", 02/22/1998 18:14, Raymond A. Rogoway
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 19:50, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 19:51, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 20:48, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/22/1998 21:17, Tim Folkerts
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/22/1998 22:11, A. R. Marlow
Re: Apparent weight, 02/23/1998 00:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/23/1998 11:21, James W. Wheeler
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/23/1998 12:09, Paul Camp
Re: Universal expansion or local contraction?, 02/23/1998 12:14, Paul Camp
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/23/1998 12:39, A. R. Marlow
Re: phases of ice, 02/23/1998 12:59, brian whatcott
Re: Universal expansion or local contraction?, 02/23/1998 14:02, Gary Karshner
Re: SI units, 02/23/1998 14:52, James Mclean
Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 16:44, Lowell Herr
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/23/1998 17:46, Mark Sylvester
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 18:04, A. R. Marlow
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 18:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 19:01, DSCHROEDER
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 19:03, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 19:05, Joe Darling
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 19:32, DSCHROEDER
Re: Curvature of Space, 02/23/1998 19:41, brian whatcott
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 19:56, brian whatcott
textbook prices, 02/23/1998 20:02, DSCHROEDER
Re: SI units, 02/23/1998 20:14, Joe Darling
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 20:25, DSCHROEDER
Re: textbook prices, 02/23/1998 22:17, Ed Schweber
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/23/1998 22:30, brian whatcott
Test (discard), 02/23/1998 23:22, A. R. Marlow
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles (fwd), 02/23/1998 23:50, A. R. Marlow
Electric Deflection of Water Columns, 02/24/1998 00:30, brian whatcott
Re: Apparent Weight, 02/24/1998 02:07, James Mclean
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 03:42, Martha Takats
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 05:52, J Kiefer
The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 08:40, John Mallinckrodt
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 09:17, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 09:34, DSCHROEDER
optical diodes, was Re: Curvature of Space, 02/24/1998 09:34, John Gastineau
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 09:42, DSCHROEDER
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 09:48, Joseph Bellina
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 10:12, Paul Camp
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 10:27, Martha Takats
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 10:30, Joe Darling
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 10:55, John Mallinckrodt
A paradox?, 02/24/1998 11:02, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 11:31, Uri Ganiel
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 11:33, DSCHROEDER
Re: displacement current, 02/24/1998 11:41, crawford j maccallum
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 11:42, Joseph Bellina
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 11:43, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 11:52, DSCHROEDER
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 12:59, Chuck Britton
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 13:29, Paul Camp
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 13:30, Paul Camp
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 13:43, Dennis Krause
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 13:53, Leigh Palmer
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 14:02, Sr. Margaret Clarke
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 14:08, Jon Bell
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 14:19, James W. Wheeler
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 14:21, Clarence Bennett
Re: textbook prices, 02/24/1998 14:22, Lynn Aldrich
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 14:28, George Spagna
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 14:29, Lynn Aldrich
The Good Old Days, 02/24/1998 14:35, SCIAMANDA
Re: Universal expansion or local contraction?, 02/24/1998 14:50, schwarz
good old days - favorite meters, new and old, 02/24/1998 14:56, Michael Moloney
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/24/1998 14:58, Joseph Bellina
getting old, 02/24/1998 15:07, Mark Shapiro
Re: Increasing Mass of Particles, 02/24/1998 15:29, Leigh Palmer
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 15:51, Leigh Palmer
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 15:53, Leigh Palmer
Summer T^3 Instutute in Toledo OH, 02/24/1998 16:11, David Simmons
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 16:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 16:18, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: The Good Old Days, 02/24/1998 16:33, Donald E. Simanek
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 16:41, William Weiler
misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/24/1998 16:44, crawford j maccallum
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 16:48, Lowell Herr
Re: a paradox ?, 02/24/1998 16:59, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Leaving the List, 02/24/1998 17:00, Matthew P. Lowry
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/24/1998 17:38, Leigh Palmer
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 18:11, Leigh Palmer
Re: a paradox ?, 02/24/1998 19:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: a paradox?, 02/24/1998 20:02, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: The good old days, 02/24/1998 20:22, Rick Tarara
Re: The Good Old Days, 02/24/1998 20:32, Ken Caviness
Re: A paradox?, 02/24/1998 20:49, Ken Caviness
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/24/1998 22:31, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: a paradox?, 02/24/1998 23:31, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/24/1998 23:52, Richard Grandy
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/24/1998 23:54, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 00:18, Leigh Palmer
Re: a paradox?, 02/25/1998 02:08, Leigh Palmer
radiation pressure, 02/25/1998 02:20, Leigh Palmer
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 02:27, Leigh Palmer
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 05:42, Igal Galili
Re: a paradox?, 02/25/1998 05:57, Igal Galili
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 08:57, Wolfgang Rueckner
Re: a paradox?, 02/25/1998 09:36, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 09:40, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: radiation pressure, 02/25/1998 10:10, DSCHROEDER
Re: a paradox?, 02/25/1998 10:10, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: HP-15C, 02/25/1998 10:18, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: The good old days (was Re: textbook prices), 02/25/1998 10:30, Jerry Lisantti
is "ice cube cutting wire" demo a misconception?, 02/25/1998 11:30, William Beaty
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 11:39, Chuck Britton
Re: radiation pressure, 02/25/1998 11:47, James W. Wheeler
Re: radiation pressure, 02/25/1998 11:47, SCIAMANDA
Re: The Good Old Days, 02/25/1998 11:49, Jim Riley
Re: textbook prices, 02/25/1998 11:52, Gary Karshner
8 mm film loop projector, 02/25/1998 11:53, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
preliminary result on textbook prices, 02/25/1998 12:24, DSCHROEDER
Re: a paradox ?, 02/25/1998 12:39, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: textbook prices, 02/25/1998 13:19, DSCHROEDER
Re: Apparent weight, 02/25/1998 13:56, David Dockstader
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 14:28, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
American students do poorly in math and science, 02/25/1998 15:00, Larry Smith
Re: textbook prices, 02/25/1998 16:11, David Dockstader
Re: Apparent weight, 02/25/1998 16:42, A. R. Marlow
Re: textbook prices, 02/25/1998 16:45, Vern Lindberg
Re: American students do poorly in math and science, 02/25/1998 16:52, Mark Shapiro
Re: The Good Old Days, 02/25/1998 16:54, David Dockstader
Re: textbook prices, 02/25/1998 18:11, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 19:00, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/25/1998 19:26, Leigh Palmer
Re: American students do poorly in math and science, 02/25/1998 19:57, Lynn Aldrich
A Feynman Reading, 02/26/1998 00:05, Bob Sciamanda
ice and wire experiments, 02/26/1998 01:03, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 02:41, Leigh Palmer
Re: American students do poorly in math and science, 02/26/1998 05:05, Margaret Mazzolini
topics, 02/26/1998 05:16, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 06:35, Igal Galili
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 09:13, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 10:07, Igal Galili
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 10:21, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Textbook Misconceptions, 02/26/1998 10:26, Tim Folkerts
Re: SI units, 02/26/1998 10:28, Igal Galili
Re: a paradox ?, 02/26/1998 10:33, James W. Wheeler
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 10:34, William Beaty
Re: Apparent weight, 02/26/1998 10:55, David Dockstader
Hestenes Mechanics book, 02/26/1998 11:12, Bob Sciamanda
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 11:46, David Dockstader
Re: a paradox?, 02/26/1998 12:14, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Anti-matter, 02/26/1998 12:53, John DaCorte
Re: Apparent weight, 02/26/1998 12:55, A. R. Marlow
What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/26/1998 13:01, Tim Folkerts
Re: topics, 02/26/1998 13:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: Hestenes Mechanics book, 02/26/1998 13:19, James S. Marsh
Re: topics, 02/26/1998 13:58, Daniel L. MacIsaac
Re: Anti-matter, 02/26/1998 13:58, Prof. John P. Ertel (wizard)
Re: Anti-matter, 02/26/1998 14:20, James W. Wheeler
Re: topics, 02/26/1998 15:03, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: Anti-matter, 02/26/1998 15:42, Shawn Kolitch
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 15:47, Leigh Palmer
Re: SI units, 02/26/1998 16:25, Guntbert Reiter
Re: SI units, 02/26/1998 16:50, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 19:29, brian whatcott
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/26/1998 19:51, Rick Tarara
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/26/1998 21:00, Leigh Palmer
Re: topics, 02/26/1998 21:28, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: SI units, 02/26/1998 22:30, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: Anti-matter, 02/27/1998 02:08, William J. Larson
Re: Anti-matter, 02/27/1998 03:04, Leigh Palmer
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 03:59, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 04:46, Ian Macdonald
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 04:55, Dr. William Newbolt
Re: topics, 02/27/1998 07:38, kyle forinash
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 07:58, Donald E. Simanek
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 08:04, Tim Burgess
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 09:17, Rauber, Joel Phys
Re: Anti-matter, 02/27/1998 09:27, Dennis Krause
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 10:06, Richard W. Tarara
Re: antimatter, 02/27/1998 10:41, Paul Zitzewitz
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 10:50, mdittman
SI units (historical refs.), 02/27/1998 10:56, Rick Strickert
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 11:00, James W. Wheeler
TIMSS on the Web, 02/27/1998 11:03, Roger Freedman
Re: antimatter, 02/27/1998 11:10, Roger Freedman
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 11:18, George Spagna
Re: textbook prices, 02/27/1998 11:24, Paul Camp
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 11:31, Donald E. Simanek
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 11:40, 00j0watson
Re: Anti-matter, 02/27/1998 11:45, Paul Camp
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 11:59, Paul Camp
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 12:06, hake
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 12:53, David Dockstader
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 13:49, Richard W. Tarara
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 15:08, Tim Burgess
Re: antimatter, 02/27/1998 15:24, Chuck Britton
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 15:48, Dewey Dykstra, Jr.
Millennium Evening at the White House, 02/27/1998 16:08, Warren Hein
Re: Anti-matter, 02/27/1998 16:44, Jerry Lisantti
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 17:10, Herbert H. Gottlieb
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 18:54, Doug Benning
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 19:07, Doug Benning
new fifth force, 02/27/1998 19:33, Larry Smith
Re:What to teach (was ...), 02/27/1998 20:57, LUDWIK KOWALSKI
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 21:31, Tim Burgess
Re: ice melting (was under skates), 02/27/1998 21:46, brian whatcott
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/27/1998 22:02, Rick Tarara
Re: SI units, 02/27/1998 23:41, brian whatcott
Re: new fifth force, 02/28/1998 08:05, brian whatcott
An interesting opportunity, 02/28/1998 10:43, Namkcihp
Re: SI units, 02/28/1998 12:47, Guntbert Reiter
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/28/1998 13:04, hake
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/28/1998 13:10, hake
Re: Anti-matter, 02/28/1998 13:20, JACK L. URETSKY (C) 1996; HEP DIV., ARGONNE NATIONAL LAB, ARGONNE, IL 60439
Re: Universal expansion or local contraction?, 02/28/1998 14:07, Raacc
Re: What to teach (was: American students do poorly), 02/28/1998 14:40, Tim Burgess
Re: misconception re ice melting under skates, 02/28/1998 15:07, crawford j maccallum
Re: SI units, 02/28/1998 16:12, Rick Stine
Re: new fifth force, 02/28/1998 16:17, Leigh Palmer
Re: SI units, 02/28/1998 19:45, brian whatcott
Text omission = lost pedagogical opportunity, 03/01/1998 00:18, Bob Sciamanda
[no subject], 12/27/2017 15:49, Unknown

Chronology	Switch Index
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	Thread Index

Mail converted by MHonArc