Phys-L List Archive (by Thread) of August, 2016

Search Archives

• Re: [Phys-L] charge distribution leading up to a capacitor, Jeff Spirko
  • Re: [Phys-L] charge distribution leading up to a capacitor, John Denker
• [Phys-L] How to survive a free fall, Woolf, Lawrence
  • Re: [Phys-L] How to survive a free fall, rjensen
    • Re: [Phys-L] How to survive a free fall, David Marx
• [Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!, rjensen
  • Re: [Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!, Richard Heckathorn
    • Re: [Phys-L] Why **UNITS** matter!, John Denker
• [Phys-L] Is Most Published Research Wrong?, Derek McKenzie
• [Phys-L] what a nice surprise, Ludwik Kowalski
• [Phys-L] good news, ludwik kowalski
• [Phys-L] really great stuff, ludwik kowalski
• [Phys-L] what an amazing place, ludwik kowalski
• [Phys-L] look at that nice things, ludwik kowalski
• [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, stefan jeglinski
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, stefan jeglinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, stefan jeglinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Daniel MacIsaac
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Jeffrey Schnick
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Daniel MacIsaac
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • [Phys-L] momentum ... as used in the laws of motion, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] momentum ... as used in the laws of motion, Bernard Cleyet
      • [Phys-L] Noether's theorem, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] Noether's theorem, Bernard Cleyet
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bruce McKay
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bob Sciamanda
      • [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] defining inertia ... or not, Joseph Bellina
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Daniel MacIsaac
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, stefan jeglinski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bill Norwood
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Leon de Oliveira
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Derek McKenzie
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Derek McKenzie
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • [Phys-L] confusing questions about the force laws, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] confusing questions about the force laws, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
  • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Derek McKenzie
    • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bernard Cleyet
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Philip Keller
      • [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Philip Keller
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Richard Heckathorn
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] inertia and the tablecloth demo, Bernard Cleyet
• [Phys-L] wow, what a surprise, kowalskil
• [Phys-L] wow, that's so great, kowalskil
• Re: [Phys-L] inertia and tablecloth, David Ward
• Re: [Phys-L] [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306, Bernard Cleyet
  • Re: [Phys-L] [Phys-l] real-world exercise : AB 306, LaMontagne, Bob
• [Phys-L] dark matter, Anthony Lapinski
  • Re: [Phys-L] dark matter, Richard Tarara
  • Re: [Phys-L] dark matter, Paul Nord
• [Phys-L] Simone Biles's Physics, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: [Phys-L] Simone Biles's Physics, Todd Pedlar
• Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Derek McKenzie
  • [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, John Denker
    • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Scott Orshan
    • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Jeff Bigler
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Todd Pedlar
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, LaMontagne, Bob
      • [Phys-L] physics force ... as opposed to agency, intent, causation, et cetera, John Denker
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Ken Caviness
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, LaMontagne, Bob
      • [Phys-L] conservation of momentum, John Denker
      • [Phys-L] simultaneity at a distance., John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] simultaneity at a distance., LaMontagne, Bob
    • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, John Denker
    • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Jeff Bigler
      • Re: [Phys-L] treating force as a vector ... consistently, Richard Tarara
• [Phys-L] Did Newton really understand momentum?, Derek McKenzie
• [Phys-L] Math and Quantitative Sciences, Rick Nelson
• Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Derek McKenzie
  • [Phys-L] physics without cross products, John Denker
    • Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products, Moses Fayngold
      • Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products and (!) without right-hand rules, John Denker
  • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, John Denker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Derek McKenzie
    • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
    • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Joseph Bellina
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, LaMontagne, Bob
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Anthony Lapinski
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Richard Tarara
      • Re: [Phys-L] mathematics, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] mathematics, Chuck Britton
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Bob Sciamanda
      • Re: [Phys-L] nature +- observations +- models, Joseph Bellina
• Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products, Derek McKenzie
  • Re: [Phys-L] physics without cross products, John Denker
• [Phys-L] Ski jumper in the slowing down phase, Savinainen Antti
• [Phys-L] There's a new AMPERE coming.;, Bob Sciamanda
  • Re: [Phys-L] There's a new AMPERE coming.;, Chuck Britton
    • Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole, Chuck Britton
      • Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole, John Denker
      • Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole, David Marx
      • Re: [Phys-L] the new SI -- ampere, kilogram, kelvin, and mole, David Marx
• [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Derek McKenzie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Derek McKenzie
• [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Dan Beeker
  • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Paul Nord
    • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Doug Peltz
      • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Daniel MacIsaac
      • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Paul Nord
      • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Ken Caviness
      • Re: [Phys-L] A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Paul Nord
  • [Phys-L] Violin string excitation, spectrum, and Q Was: Re: A beautiful (short) demo for sound and waves..., Bernard Cleyet