Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On Mar 22, 2025, at 6:42 PM, John Denker via Phys-l <phys-l@mail.phys-l.org> wrote:
On 3/20/25 04:33, Joseph Bellina via Phys-l wrote:
One further point in the event that there are too few or no
stopwatches the experiments can be done by the teacher keeping time
and the students counting swings. I have used a form of this with
students in grades 3 through 13
1) That's clever. I like that.
2) How many of them figured out the following?
You can reduce the quantization error, especially
for the longer/slower pendulums:
Rather than counting "swings" per se, count
the number of zero-crossings plus the number of
turning points, then divide by 4.
3) Maybe not the 3rd graders, but many of the
13th graders nowadays have smartphones. Here's a
web page that functions as:
*) a plain old clock,
*) and a stopwatch,
*) with a powerful split-timer.
It can record an unlimited number of splits, with millisecond
resolution.
On a desktop you can copy all the splits to the clipboard,
and then paste them into your favorite editor or spreadsheet
app.
In an android environment, you can /share/ the splits to
the app of your choice.
============
There's a serious lesson in this: There are a great many
situations where you get better results by timestamping
things (rather than counting them over some interval)
In the research lab there are event-timers all over the
place, often with sub-nanosecond resolution.
Back in the horse-and-buggy days, people used counters,
which produced a smaller amount of data, which was
easier to manage ... but not any more. You don't want
less data; you want cleaner data. Managing it is the
least of your worries. That's what computers are for.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@mail.phys-l.org
https://www.phys-l.org/mailman/listinfo/phys-l