Will be discussing this in my (high school) astronomy class in a few
months. Seeing conflicting results online. Density shows universe is open,
but CMB says it's flat (see below). What about evidence for closed? It
seems that a flat universe would be a special case and highly unlikely
(expansion = 0 at infinite size). Maybe the data suggested otherwise. Or do
cosmologists have biases toward a flat universe? Dark matter? Olbers'
Paradox - age and size are finite.
*Recent measurements (c. 2001) by a number of ground-based and
balloon-based experiments, including MAT/TOCO
<https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/cosmology/mat/>, Boomerang
<https://cmb.phys.cwru.edu/boomerang/>, Maxima
<https://cosmology.berkeley.edu/group/cmb/index.html>, and DASI
<https://astro.uchicago.edu/dasi/>, have shown that the brightest spots are
about 1 degree across. Thus the universe was known to be flat to within
about 15% accuracy prior to the WMAP results. WMAP has confirmed this
result with very high accuracy and precision. We now know (as of 2013) that
the universe is flat with only a 0.4% margin of error. This suggests that
the Universe is infinite in extent; however, since the Universe has a
finite age, we can only observe a finite volume of the Universe. All we can
truly conclude is that the Universe is much larger than the volume we can
directly observe.*