Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-L] heat content

From: Chuck Britton <cvbritton@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:15:21 -0500

But perhaps these don’t constitute ‘motion’.

On Feb 18, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Chuck Britton <cvbritton@mac.com> wrote:

As Far as I Know - SuperFluid flows as well as Superconducting currents would continue at Absolute Zero.

I am aware of no evidence to the contrary - but the actual experiment has not been performed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-L] heat content
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
- Re: [Phys-L] zero-point motion at the introductory level
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>

References:
- Re: [Phys-L] [SPAM] Re: heat content
  - From: David Bowman <David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu>
- Re: [Phys-L] heat content
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-L] heat content
  - From: David Bowman <David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu>
- Re: [Phys-L] heat content
  - From: "Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>
- Re: [Phys-L] heat content
  - From: Chuck Britton <cvbritton@mac.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-L] heat content
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-L] heat content
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-L] heat content
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-L] heat content
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread