Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] the sun

From: carmelo@pacific.net.sg
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:02:43 +0800

Quoting "Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>:

I fully agree INDIRECTLY the HR diagram relates to mass. But to derive
such relationships (as JD was implying) is PhD level work for a team of
people and a powerful computer.

There was one astrophysicist solved it without the use of computer.

Alphonsus

References:
- [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: Larry Smith <larry.smith@snow.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: "Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: Brian Whatcott <betwys1@sbcglobal.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: "Michael Edmiston" <edmiston@bluffton.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] the sun
  - From: "Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Inertia?
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] [tap-l] Ice spikes
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] the sun
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] the sun
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread