| Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date | 
| [Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | 
| 
 May I pursue the Q about complex wave amplitudes a little
differently (but it's still 
pedagogy). Accepting that complex expressions are useful in
handling phase in 
electrical circuits, let's assume that students would know
about 2-vector space, 
one way or another, early on. My question, directed toward
teachers of QM, is ... 
when (chronologically) are students expected to understand
that approaches to 
the TISE must be via complex wave amplitude expressions
(Aexp[i(kx-wt)])? And 
how (where) is this expectation introduced to the student's
sense of mind's-eye reality? In fact, is this possible in the first place? For
example would one say.. 
"Students, you will have to learn a wave amplitude _expression_
quite different than 
the one that models the surface of a ripple tank. No longer
will y=Acos(kx) suffice; rather a complex wave (no picture)..etc..Later you'll
see the practical reality" 
                                                 
sincerely            Tim
Wagner 
 |