Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Jack wrote:
I think that current usage is a mu+ mu- atom. In that usage,
quark + anti-quark states (like the J/psi and the Upsilon) are
referred to generically as quarkonium.
I do not want to be pushed into domains in which I am nearly
ignorant. My illustration, except for the h-bar, can be made
meaningful in an introductory course.
.. It then cascades, largely by E1 transitions down to low-n
states from which it annihilates with the proton. Last time I
looked, decades ago, the capture time was mysteriously
longer than expected from calculations.
I would expect the binary system made of a proton and of an
antiproton to last forever in a perfect vacuum. Why do the
two particles annihilate when the distance between them is
much larger (58 F) than the range ( ~2 F) of strong nuclear
forces? Are we going to bring elephants again?
Ludwik Kowalski
********************************************
To understand is to find a satisfactory causal relation.
To explain is to express that understanding.
To teach is to promote understanding.
********************************************